Jose Escamilla's Roswell Rods, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times


reply posted on 18-12-2007 @ 08:40 PM by lovepens1
reply to post by dave420



sounds like this should be almost moved to a different forum. Like mythical beasts and creatures.

Besides we have unicorn on film, bigfoot on film, mothman on film, nessie.

Mothman flies, but not in the ufo and alien forum, oh, that's right, he's identified, it's mothman. So that brings me to this. Our flying creatures have been identified as rods. This has no business being in the ufo forum.


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 12:12 AM by lovepens1
reply to post by RING0




actually jose's thread was originally posted in the ufo forum and got sent back here to the small table. Mostly probably because of myself.

Have a field day with his commercial folks.


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 11:26 AM by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by RING0



Yeah, rods a real photographs.
Only some might be the super zeppelin, or tube ufos.
But I don't think Jose will find one or be sent one in collaboration.

He can talk about rods all he wants BECAUSE everyone will be looking
for the real ufo cylinder craft.

Lets not play games, thats the secret or unspoken reason people buy films
for rods, unless a lot of biologists are taking this serious.
But thats their prerogative how they spend their money.

Jose may talk about rods but the people are think ufo.



reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 06:57 PM by Europa733
Hello,

What are RODS ? Unidentified artefacts on camera & film, anything ranging from dust particles flying close to the lens to insects, it has been proven by
scientists not by film makers.

Wiki is your friend : Flying Rod mystery solved
en.wikipedia.org...(cryptozoology)

To Jose : Could you please stop that, there's young people in here, do not teach them this kind of stuff ? They are going to look stupid at school.

What is next ? : hypersonic alien insects ?


Later,


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 07:40 PM by LwSiX
reply to post by RING0



Yeah okay, i was pretty much behind Jose until i saw that video and read this


There was a girlfriend of mine from Arizona I have since lost contact with, but while we were parked at the side of the highway, and while I was flashing the headlights at them trying to get their attention, in my rear view mirror, I saw what appeared to be a reptile looking humanoid.


Come on now, thats pretty outrageous!


[edit on 19-12-2007 by LwSiX]

[edit on 19-12-2007 by LwSiX]

Mod Edit: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 2010/8/26 by GradyPhilpott]


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 11:13 PM by Jose Escamilla
Protopterygote:

During my move back to Los Angeles in 1998, I met Dave Blackburn who brought to my attention a book entitled: The Origin of Flight.

In this table top book he brings me something that totally blew me away. Dr. Robin Wooten had written a thesis on what he felt was the prehistoric ancestor to today's insects. What I always would have thought the ancestor to today's insects would have looked like, I would have felt that a giant dragon fly would be it.

When I saw the photo of an actual model Dr. Wooten commissioned someone to make that actually glided, and was aeronautically stable, I totally maxed out!

So we tried for a couple years to try and get him to appear on camera and tell us his thoughts on whether or not Rods could be living prehistoric ancestors that may have 'survived."

He never even gave an email response to our requests. We were totally ignored. So all these years we have wanted him to comment on the Rods. Well finally History Channel has him! He's in the new Rods special (please I am not hawking this special for profit), I get no money from it. I got paid a flat fee for footage an appearance and believe me, (they never have budgets), so the only ones raking in large dollah to make them hollah is the network from their advertisers. I haven't even been given a screener as a courtesy. I hope I don't wind up getting the shaft again as I got from "Proof Positive" who didn't do as they claimed, study ever aspect of the phenomena. Instead they refused to present the space shuttle footage, underwater footage, because that would make their simple debunking very difficult.

So here is the Protopterygote. (Sorry about my rant), but you people need to know that for every opportunity I've had to present the Rods producers have not been kind nor truthful in their motives.

Proof Positive is one of those debunker programs that need to be exposed for the fraud they are. They claim to be conducting scientific investigations and as they did with the Rods, it was all bunko man...!

www.youtube.com...

Jose Escamilla


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 11:22 PM by Jose Escamilla
The name of the IMAX film is: The Journey of Man.

I went to see the film because I had heard that the 3d was incredible. So I go there and view the film with JIm Peters and we watched it. The 3D is awesome. They had the shutter glasses and this film was just fantastic. Things right there up close and popping out at you.

So we watched it and that was it. Then one about a year later, it was showing again. I went to see it again. Then as I sat there viewing the statues scene, I saw it. ZIP it passed by once and that was it, but in 3D!

I saw a Rod in 3D on IMAX Film!

I had to wait for the second screening to be able to see it again. ZIP there it was again. This time I was waiting for it. No one else in the theater saw this! I was so excited. You don't know what this means! A Rod shot in 3D on IMAX Film! Absolute evidence of something long, orange in color and traveling at a high velocity across the scene! What was great seeing it in 3D was the depth. It was "right there!"

3D as you now will enable us to get accurate measurements of size / length, distance from the camera, distance for the subjects in the scene, and velocity. I watched the film seven times that day and the next. Not one person was seeing this.

SO I contacted the a processing house and asked how much it would cost to transfer a minute of IMAX film to digital Beta. The transfer from the negative is about $ 30,000.00. I needed both shots.

$ 60,000.00 to transfer the footage from both negatives to digital beta so that I could get my hands on it and find out how long and thick this this was, and how fast it was traveling, how far it was from the two actors and the cameras.

This footage being presented here was taken from the DVD, which has copy guard, and I would like to explain something about video transferring. Depending on which deck you are using, sometimes, when you transfer video from a DVD for example, you may catch either the object in one sequence of frames.

What I have to do in order to record from the DVD I have to record it first to a DV Cam deck.

When I see the playback of the very same clip on the dv Cam tape, I am getting a different set of frames captured on playback.

So in this clip, you are seeing only one field where the object appears n four fields or two frames. I hope I am not confusing you. I want to get the digital beta transfers made. Send them to Bruce Macabbe and Jim Diletosso and let them bring forth the data from the 3D information. One of these days this will happen. I was hoping all the networks would do this, but they never have enough money in their budgets. So goes the saga.

www.youtube.com...

Jose Escamilla
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Strange creatures from Marianas Trench
  Posted 6 days ago with 26 member flags
\'Woolly mammoth\' caught on camera in Siberia
  Posted 5 days ago with 20 member flags
icelandic lake monster spotted! (VIDEO)
  Posted 6 days ago with 16 member flags
Shape-Shifting Dinosaurs by Jack Horner (TED Talk)
  Posted 3 days ago with 6 member flags
Bigfoot Attack...or is the Lizard Man in Georgia?
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
\'mutant spider fears at nuclear wastelab\'
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags
here is how to catch sasquatch
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags