posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 06:00 AM
well now i post what i have deleteed in my last post, replacing it saying that i just shut up, leavng you the fun to examine the pics. that was on
has someone posted a compendium of what was being said by jose? i didnt check but i bet it hasnt happened..
but i am astounded that noone came up with what i had as the first impression when seeing jose's pics.
ok, some mentioned that a flash was used, and that checking the exif data it would be easy to set things straight.
just for my relief, i post what i wrote earlier and deleted it because i didn't want to offend all those believers. i am always astounded how many of
you just are willing to see just those 3% of a story and wash away those 97% which mostly is BS..
ok, now before my HD crashes or my time goes by, a flash hits me, my pc stalls, i post this now and exclusively to ATS, with no other announcement or
ad or any talk with my lawyer ^^
well those images posted by jose are making me sad. or should i laugh.
there is nothing that proofs one claim.
everyone sees that this gridkeeper and JLW have problems writing perfect their motherlanguage.
"hear they are hear"
"they are hear so that meens there in deep sapce"
"i was filming right hear"
"i was hear"
well, thats third grade. i am not insulting here, it is, right? every kid from every country in the world can write at the toilet "i was here".
now here we have some awesome patent-wanna-be-owner who writes "i was hear".
yes, i hear what those awesome "stills" and other pics are telling me:
i wanted to believe. but not one tiny bit here is true!
and all those normal camera pics are not even able to capture satellite who then are shown in an astro-special-calidoscope-goggle used by those
and then those pics taken with a camera look like a flash was used :-) now i do not explain what that means. i just say its impossible to pinpoint
those objects with a normal cam and then go in there with an telescope. sorry, but imagine making a pic with a normal camera in the sky. would you see
se space station? even by using a flash?? noooo!
i dont want to check the imprint, its too obvious even for the naked eye.
oh my god, sometimes, and now again there is such a moment, i would like to slap me for reading all through it!!