Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

The Interstellar Case Files: by Jose Escamilla

page: 24
73
<< 21  22  23    25  26 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
It is my opinion that people like Mr. Escamilla will not be the ones to expose the truth of what's "out there". I firmly believe it will be a debunker or a skeptic. Someone who does not have an emotional or more importantly a financial interest that is often juxtaposed against honest evaluations of all of the evidence in all of it's context.
[edit on 20-12-2007 by SlightlyAbovePar]


Hello SAP & everyone,

First, l wanted to congratulate you for your message, because even if I do not consider myself a skeptic regarding the UAP subject, I still share and understand a lot if not all of what you wrote.

What you just said right up there is a question that I have asked myself recently :

"What about asking the worth skeptics & scientific journalists and bring them
with me in Hessdalen Norway just for them to meet the specialists and see their data and equipment ?" In my country (France) this is exactly what I just did with a very notorious journalist & writter who is an anti-ISS, anti-Space Colonisation & Terraforming, anti-UFO-UAP.

Actually, I kind of like him but he refused this invitation and refused to read the studies that I sent him. I've seen the same kind of reactions in the biggest scientific forum using the French speaking language.

Luckily enough, I have only found one notorious skeptic & zetetician in my country, Ufologists hate him so much, they made shirts with his name and a target next to it (for real). Well, this guy is good to go, but you see what I've learned from my little experiment ? Most hardcore skeptic scientists are
not even willing to waste their time with this as it is in their BELIEF that UFO&UAP subject is connected to Aliens, so that the all thing is crap.

In my country we say : It is like throwing away the baby and it's bath water
at the same time or getting rid of Occam's razor and getting a chainsaw instead (homemade)

Peace & sorry for 98 % off topic




posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Liquidus

Iohen did a study on the image here...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
circling all the 'spacecraft' He also noticed that a flash was used... why would you use a flash to shoot spacecraft?



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:18 PM
link   


Something really needs to be done to protect high-profile people from "The Treatment" when they show up here.... (HINT HINT STAFF!!!!!)


Surely you meant to say 'to protect ATS members from uninvited snake oil salesmen.'? I fear you're transposing your wants and needs on the ATS community.

And if 'The Treatment' is making people face up to their lies then don't you think it's a good thing. Mr. Escallima would have taken your money and the shirt off your back. Blamed it on you. Then tried to sell you it all back for twice the price. Without blinking an eyelid.

Regards

Tim



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cyber_Wasp
Wouldn't it be best in the short run to work out some way of getting the equipment to play back these videos.


Well long before this thread started JWL was writing me and I offered to host his stuff on my site... but as we don't charge... we also don't have a budget to PAY... Now if they have an issue with viewing them perhaps they could send them to ATS I am sure there is someone on hand who could view them...



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:22 PM
link   
I've been reading this thread for days now, and have even put in my 2 cents, for what it's worth. I must say that it has been very disappointing to watch how the thread has unfolded. I had hoped for more. It seems to me that alot of what I read here is nonsense. I wish this time it had turned out different.



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Longy4eva
So, until we get some clear pictures we won't know


Have you actually looked at this image? Looks pretty clear to me...?



BTW where did you get the baby picture of Winston from? I thought they suppressed that?



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:35 PM
link   
Originally posted by bmpemb

I've been reading this thread for days now, and have even put in my 2 cents, for what it's worth. I must say that it has been very disappointing to watch how the thread has unfolded. I had hoped for more. It seems to me that alot of what I read here is nonsense. I wish this time it had turned out different.


I whole heartedly agree.

I made a prediction on page one.

Then I was beseeched to wait, to
hold on.

This thread would be different.

This was the "real deal".

So, I sat back, and waited.

Guess what ?

I called it, to a "T".

I'm actually saddened.

I thought Jose would last long
enough to post some pics that
proved there was no "revelationary
evidence".

Since there is none, he gets himself banned.

No fun, there.

Regards,
Lex



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by SurferXXX
I enjoyed his participation and his insights on this site. I hope I am not alone.


Your not
Perhaps he felt that since U2U's were private it was the way to fight back.. Better solution is that ignore button.. but not everyone can turn the other cheek... sooner or later you rub out of cheeks


Having experienced ummm 'a few' attacks since I started here I know how hard it is not to want to pick up the gauntlet (and smack em up side the head
)

But this is the first time I have witnessed so many new members signing on JUST to attack... kinda hard to miss them... I know its impossible to implement... but maybe new posts should be approved for a few days...

One point on the ignore button though... while it is good against certain brainless nonsense, as a researcher you have to use it sparingly... else you will be accused of ignoring your opponents... its a tough decision... personally I have only used it once... I just learned to not answer them (most of the time )


[edit on 20-12-2007 by zorgon]



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 07:59 PM
link   
Originally posted by zorgon


One point on the ignore button though... while it is good against certain brainless nonsense, as a researcher you have to use it sparingly... else you will be accused of ignoring your opponents...


I agree, 100%.

I've never used it.

I want to know what those
that oppose me have to say.



Regards,
Lex



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon
Have you actually looked at this image? Looks pretty clear to me...?


In what way is it clear?



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:09 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


The image you posted on this page looks played with,photo shopped even.
Stars all over the building and if you look closely the fainter ships look exactly like the brighter ones.They're even beside each other or relatively aligned.I get the impression that more ships were added to give the impression of an armada.
I'm no expert and can't prove a thing, it's how it appears to me.
Edited for spelling

[edit on 20-12-2007 by citizen truth]



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:15 PM
link   
reply to post by citizen truth
 


I was just going to say.

Look at how simular all the "stars/spaceships" look, as if the have been duplicated from each other.

This looks at first examination very fake.

Spot the duplicates



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by jaamaan
This looks at first examination very fake.

That's an understatement.

The "supposedly" preserved EXIF data doesn't indicate what software added the text.

Everything is blurry... except for the "stars." (and "stars" over the structure(s))

The EXIF data indicates a long exposure of 16 seconds... if there were stars in the sky, they'd be bright and blurred. No stars in the photo... no stars... no "ships."



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:47 PM
link   
Well, IMHO it's sad that this has happened.


I believe that Jose would have had allot to offer to this board as time progressed.
I'm sure there will be a few members rejoicing their victory and many who won't.

I'm also sure that if one reads from the first page and wades through the rhetoric of wordage and the off topic comments on this thread and the other threads one will find that there were a few who were, it seemed in my eyes, out to get his goat from get go.

Watching the events play out their course, it reminded me of when I was much younger, we would take a stick and keep poking at these snapping turtles, just poke, poke, poke... knowing darn well that sooner or later they would get sick of it and snap back at the stick even harder then what we were poking them and of course they always did.

Unfortunately, being a noob (which I understand is no excuse) to the board I believe Jose did not fully understand how to respond or ignore these comments "ATS style", some which to me it also seemed would not only rant in this thread but would follow his every move across to the other threads to post their barrage of non topic colorful comments. At least IMHO that is what it seemed like and the threads seem to show that.

I have watched how new visitors to this board and threads are treated and engaged and this is the first time it seemed to me that these comments were more geared towards a poster due to who he is with pretentious comments then to what he was posting or the subject at hand.

All that I'm saying is that to me it is a great loss for a chance of receiving input and engaging a serious researcher and presenter in the field of study in which I am very interested in and have devoted a great deal of my life to understanding and that his input would have been very welcomed above the normal...hey dude did you hear about this sighting or that sighting or the typical here's the link to the information I found, and of course the it's a hoax...no it's real back and forth Posts!!

Jose has had many one on ones with numerous witnesses and has first hand knowledge of events that I surely would have liked to have engaged in discussions on at a future date with him but it looks like that will not happen, at least not here on this forum.

I feel that the warm welcome that Jose received from some was less then courteous and that if this is the way that ATS members welcome higher profile members then few will follow in Jose's footsteps if this is the example and treatment they have instore.

With so many members reading between the lines yelling profiteer and such, second guessing and making up motives as to why he was here when it was apparent from the start that he was trying to put a stop to the personal attacks that were being left unchecked from Gridkeeper and calling for the same information and validation on a subject and evidence that has been presented to us and tolerated without verification or validation for quite sometime now.

Yea, maybe Jose U2Ued in a manner that was unacceptable, Maybe he thought that, that was what the U2U's purpose was for, I don't know and I won't second guess his intentions but I'll bet, just like when I was much younger...there was a bit of poke, poke, poking..before it got that far.

Oh and Jose,
Thank You for coming through on Your Word and giving us access to photographs for analysis that we would not have been able to have access to otherwise.



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:47 PM
link   



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:50 PM
link   
Check this out. It's 3:28-3:29 on:







There is also a quick streak next to the two "jets". This is probably a digital illusion like the rods? but the streak might still be there. I see it when I pause start pause quickly through the vid.



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 09:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Palasheea
 


I think I missed half the attacks.
And those ignores I had must have gone way back.

What is their problem, a temp ban might be best for personal attacks
so we can carry on quizzing Jose and getting something done.

Which makes me all the more what to hear what Jose has to say.
So there. Just like little kids.

After all, how much secret information gets put on the internet or a forum.
His so called contacts in Mexico are suspect.

Jose got saucers on film in Roswell and might have been hosed ever since.

Mexico fleets?.. here is a fleet over the Bronx, NYC:
www.youtube.com...

At 00:04 it looks like an elephant head.
Is it for the GOP party?
They are performing for some one.

Check out his other fleet photos.... one is an airplane, thought it
was a fish at first.



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 09:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by SurferXXX

I enjoyed his participation and his insights on this site. I hope I am not alone.



You are not and I am also saddened to see the banning, however it was obviously justified.

I wasn't aware of any previous discussion or what gridkeeper had to say, my own comments being based purely on this thread. The original intention of Mr Escamilla in this thread was to attempt to draw out JLW to reveal what the apparatus being used consisted of so that others could attempt to duplicate.

It is a shame that wasn't the only motive, maybe some comments would have been better made on the thread gridkeeper had posted on because that motive by itself was worthy. Too much other stuff though.

Maybe it can still be followed through to a conclusion with JLW or by others here.



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 09:38 PM
link   
I applaud all those in this thread that uncovered the true calculated attempt of the poster himself. My hat goes off to the admins in realizing the fact that whether you are a big player or a nobody like me, It don't matter! This site is about disclosure of truth! Right?

I concluded long ago in this thread that this farce was about money and we at ATS helping him in his en devour. If you read all his posts it says that! Do you really think that this man was going to do this for free? Oh yeah! Free research for him! He never made mention that the person of discovery would be financially rewarded or otherwise, for his efforts in helping him on his quest. BIG red flag! Like I said in my earlier post, this man was using the intelligence of the people at ATS to invest and make 'possible' discovery of this BS. There is nothing in near or deep orbit that isn't tracked by our governments and even the non government entities that look to the sky. I know!

I'm one that still denies ignorance, without falling through the big holes. It's the little ones with a big name that will get ya.


I would suggest that anyone that has a set up , please look for them and report their findings here. Lets get some 'Real" closure ATS style.

Guz



posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 09:40 PM
link   
I applaud all those in this thread that uncovered the true calculated attempt of the poster himself. My hat goes off to the admins in realizing the fact that whether you are a big player or a nobody like me, It don't matter! This site is about disclosure of truth! Right?

I concluded long ago in this thread that this farce was about money and we at ATS helping him in his en devour. If you read all his posts it says that! Do you really think that this man was going to do this for free? Oh yeah! Free research for him! He never made mention that the person of discovery would be financially rewarded or otherwise, for his efforts in helping him on his quest. BIG red flag! Like I said in my earlier post, this man was using the intelligence of the people at ATS to invest and make 'possible' discovery of this BS. There is nothing in near or deep orbit that isn't tracked by our governments and even the non government entities that look to the sky. I know!

I'm one that still denies ignorance, without falling through the big holes. It's the little ones with a big name that will get ya.


I would suggest that anyone that has a set up , please look for them and report their findings here. Lets get some 'Real" closure ATS style.

Guz





new topics

top topics



 
73
<< 21  22  23    25  26 >>

log in

join