Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
It is my opinion that people like Mr. Escamilla will not be the ones to expose the truth of what's "out there". I firmly believe it will be a debunker or a skeptic. Someone who does not have an emotional or more importantly a financial interest that is often juxtaposed against honest evaluations of all of the evidence in all of it's context.
[edit on 20-12-2007 by SlightlyAbovePar]
Hello SAP & everyone,
First, l wanted to congratulate you for your message, because even if I do not consider myself a skeptic regarding the UAP subject, I still share and understand a lot if not all of what you wrote.
What you just said right up there is a question that I have asked myself recently :
"What about asking the worth skeptics & scientific journalists and bring them
with me in Hessdalen Norway just for them to meet the specialists and see their data and equipment ?" In my country (France) this is exactly what I just did with a very notorious journalist & writter who is an anti-ISS, anti-Space Colonisation & Terraforming, anti-UFO-UAP.
Actually, I kind of like him but he refused this invitation and refused to read the studies that I sent him. I've seen the same kind of reactions in the biggest scientific forum using the French speaking language.
Luckily enough, I have only found one notorious skeptic & zetetician in my country, Ufologists hate him so much, they made shirts with his name and a target next to it (for real). Well, this guy is good to go, but you see what I've learned from my little experiment ? Most hardcore skeptic scientists are
not even willing to waste their time with this as it is in their BELIEF that UFO&UAP subject is connected to Aliens, so that the all thing is crap.
In my country we say : It is like throwing away the baby and it's bath water
at the same time or getting rid of Occam's razor and getting a chainsaw instead (homemade)
Peace & sorry for 98 % off topic





) 

