It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by snoopy
Yeah kid, like the FBI is going to come to your parents house, up to your bedroom and show you this info.
You obviously have no idea who you are talking to. Your weak personal attacks will get you no closer to the truth.
My personal attacks are simply paying you the same respect you pay others.
Or are you going to sit here and pretend that it's acceptable for the FBI come and bring you the evidence from an investigation?
Are you going to sit here an pretend it's acceptable to demand that the airlines go take pictures of all the wreckage in order to appease you?
If you are going to claim that these people are wrong or lying, then you need to prove it. We have provided you the evidence and articles that show things such as 95% of the wreckage being found.
So you cannot provide any evidence that there wasn't really a plane?
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by snoopy
So you cannot provide any evidence that there wasn't really a plane?
And how would you propse that someone prove a negative.
If there were in fact a plane crash, it shouldn't have been too hard to prove. Perhaps it would have looked like a plane crashed in the field? Call me a skeptic, but I am not willing to see what is not there.
You are claiming that a plane didn't crash despite all this evidence.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by snoopy
You are claiming that a plane didn't crash despite all this evidence.
Show me the evidence. Better yet, show me the proof.
So far, all I've seen is a hole in the ground with some metal scraps laying around.
Originally posted by snoopy
Or better yet, try filing a lawsuit against the government an try using those arguments.
You can't simply claim everyone is wrong because you don't believe it. You have to prove they are wrong.
Which threads in the forum have you checked so far? Can you list them for me? because there are threads on this very forum with 100s of pictures of debris. Threads with the witness quotes and everything else. Which ones have you looked at so far?
And so far no one has debunked the DNA facts proving 93 impacted in PA. All attempts have fallen short on facts and evidence. The smoking gun, is not there.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by snoopy
Or better yet, try filing a lawsuit against the government an try using those arguments.
You mean something like this lawsuit?
You can't simply claim everyone is wrong because you don't believe it. You have to prove they are wrong.
Where is the forensic evidence that shows 95% of the alleged plane being recovered? Where is the forensic evidence that matches the alleged wreckage by serial numbers to the alleged plane that was allegedly flight UA93?
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by beachnut
And so far no one has debunked the DNA facts proving 93 impacted in PA. All attempts have fallen short on facts and evidence. The smoking gun, is not there.
DNA does not prove that Flight 93 impacted in Shanksville, unless you have proof that the DNA material was indeed recovered at the scene. I have yet to see a proper chain of custody report, but I must admit that I would even be skeptical of an easily falsified report at this point. This is why there must be a new and independent investigation, so that the photographic evidence can be confirmed. In any investigation, human remains will be photographed and their location marked, before being moved from the scene.
So when the coroner testifies to verify that he indeed got the samples from the crash site and handed them off to the next person who then verifies they received it from him and did the testing, what is your argument going to be?
And how are you going to explain what happened to the people on the flight who are known to have left on that flight that according to you magically disappeared over the exact area that a crash took place.
And how will you explain all of the plane ending up there at that exact moment?
how are you going to explain the 1000s of people who would all have to be in on this conspiracy and for no reason?
And how about you show us examples of photographs of all human remains from an accident scene and you show us the chain of command and everything else you require from any other accident?
You're just trying to play a game by making the requirements impossible so you can pretend you have made a valid argument.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
I have seen no such evidence. If I did, I would follow the path where the evidence leads. Don't mistake me for someone who is trying to prove anything one way or the other. I have no agenda.
That is because you have yet to look. Which threads did you look at so far? I have already asked you and you didn't respond. There are 100s of threads on this with all the info, which did you check so far?
Kindly refrain from attributing to me erroneous statements that you yourself choose to make up.
I have never said that anyone "magically disappeared over the exact area..." Do you have any proof that those people actually were over the exact area?
I am not making it up, you are making implications that leave NO other possibility. If what you are saying is correct, that's the ONLY remaining possibility. Unless of course you would care to give us your theory on what happened. yes we have proof the people were over that exact area. Tons of it. But you choose not to simply use the search function on this forum to find it.
You mean all of the plane that you have still failed to show me? I'll tell you what. Let's make it easy. Just show me the engine cores to start with.
Again, which threads id you check so far? Please list them. And yes you DO have an agenda. To pretend that well known facts never happened. And you wonder why no one outside of a conspiracy forum takes you seriously.
There is no reason to believe that thousands of people would have to have been "in on" any conspiracy. Misdirection and compartmentalization would absolve any such need.
OK, prove it. Prove that everyone involved was oblivious to everything going on. Prove someone tampered with everything and no one was able to notice anything. It's your claim that YOU made. Please back it up.
If you would like to see the accident scenes I have worked, or the homicide investigations I have been privy to, send me a U2U with your email address. Be advised, they are not for the squeamish.
Yes I would. Post them here. And I also want proof that those pictures came form the actual scenes you claim they did. I want proof that it wasn't planted by you from somewhere else. Until you can do so, you can't prove anything. And I want proof that due to compartmentalization that they haven't been tampered with.
I am doing no such thing. Perhaps you should learn how a proper investigation is carried out, before you go making wild accusations about me.
Oh you absolutely are doing just that and you clearly have no idea how a proper investigation is run. You have already proven it. You already haven't shown any proof of accidents you said you have been investigating. And then you expect people who weren't there to provide you the same evidence. Evidence that you can just as easily dismiss any way you want to. But you can't prove any tampering. You know very well that none of the accidents you may have seen have online documentation. And thus anyone can claim that none of them exist.
So please share with us what happened. Or just answer this question. Did flight 93 crash there or not? yes or no?