It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are you kidding Boone 870? One engine out of a whole Boeing 757? No tail parts? (The tail is the last section of the airplane to arrive at the scene of the accident. It usually survives because it is going so much slower and so less apt to disintegrate.)
Why are we expected to believe that all the fuel evaporated in one big fireball in Penn while it burned away like napalm in the WTC?
Someone tried to explain away the missing engine as the result of a Sidewinder missile. Even if 93 was shot down, there is no certainty that it was taken down with a heat-seeker. A radar-guided missile could have just as easily done the job.
Most excellent. Thanks for the info. I plan to present this to some hardcore "debunkie junkies" here at home
Now I have to do my own research on something that I originally researched and posted?
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by Boone 870
Do you have any verifiable evidence that the debris was planted?
I'm waiting with baited breath for your proof!
Are you kidding Boone 870? One engine out of a whole Boeing 757? No tail parts? (The tail is the last section of the airplane to arrive at the scene of the accident. It usually survives because it is going so much slower and so less apt to disintegrate.)
Nope. No videos of the debris being planted. It might have been a secret op, but thats just a guess.
Thanks for the post.
You might want to be careful presenting that info....because its based on a BBC story that the BBC has admitted was wrong.
If there is evidence suggesting that the "hijackers" are alive, I feel the burden of proof then returns to the official investigation to support the claims which were originally based on minimal to no evidence in the beginning.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Lost? nope, sitting in my entertainment center with the rest of my videos...as for posting it..not going to happen. You can do your own research and find the news footage for yourself.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
No, according to official reports approximately 95% of the jet was recovered and in the end turned over to United Airlines (with the exception of the data recorders)
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
If there is evidence suggesting that the "hijackers" are alive, I feel the burden of proof then returns to the official investigation to support the claims which were originally based on minimal to no evidence in the beginning.
Have you ever met anyone that shared the same name as you? Thats what happened here. The people the BBC found as being the "live" hijackers, did not match the photos of the terrorists. Saudi Arabia does not dispute the hijacker identities either...
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
You might want to be careful presenting that info....because its based on a BBC story that the BBC has admitted was wrong.
Did the FBI also retract this as well? If so, could you please validate that? Could you also validate BBC retracted? Thank you in advance.
911review.org...
"FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt."
Originally posted by jackinthebox
Wreckage doesn't just disappear, especially over land.
I agree. Think of the Shuttle Columbia disaster.
Originally posted by johnlear
There is no evidence that this engine was from a Boeing 757 or from a United Airines Boeing 757. There is no evidence that another engine was found. Its curious that since the airplane hit inverted in a 35 degree dive why any engine was found buried as they should have been shielded from being imbedded in the ground by the wing itself.
Did the FBI also retract this as well? If so, could you please validate that? Could you also validate BBC retracted? Thank you in advance.
The FBI has resolved questions about the identities of the 19 hijackers involved in the Sept. 11 attacks and has discovered places outside the United States where the conspiracy was planned, FBI Director Robert Mueller said Friday.
Saudi Arabian officials and others have questioned whether some of the hijackers identified by the FBI in the weeks after the attacks used stolen identifications. Mueller said those questions have been answered.
"We at this point definitely know the 19 hijackers who were responsible," he said. Linked from 911myths.com
Planes burning on the ground while stationary or even UA175 are not exactly the same as one going near vertically straight into the ground.
Originally posted by Boone 870
Can you link the retraction?
BBC
If the citation below are the paragraphs you call a retraction, BBC did not make a retraction. They made a minor correction on one name and left everything else stand as is. The FBI did a flip-flop, and calling it a true retraction would be stretching it to breaking point.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by Boone 870
Do you have any verifiable evidence that the debris was planted?
I'm waiting with baited breath for your proof!
Are you kidding Boone 870? One engine out of a whole Boeing 757? No tail parts? (The tail is the last section of the airplane to arrive at the scene of the accident. It usually survives because it is going so much slower and so less apt to disintegrate.)
Nope. No videos of the debris being planted. It might have been a secret op, but thats just a guess.
Thanks for the post.
Not exactly the same is it though? A space shuttle disintegrating at high altitude, in comparison to a jet hitting the ground vertically.