It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sky watcher
reply to post by shaell
Well what happens when Bush visits Israel this week and tries to pay the temple mount a visit? I guess that would blow the Sharron theory. I hope Bush don't try that.
Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by shaell
Again, you can't forget that Gabriel also mentions "after 69 sevens." We can't throw out a part of the passage just because it doesn't fit what we want and claim only the 62 sevens are important.
You've stated that the events between 1993-2000 could be a shadow of the real prophecy - so my question is: what seven year treaty are you looking for? Are you looking for all of these manmade assumptions attatched to the prophecy to occur first?... Things that aren't actually written? Such as, "first a third temple must be built" and that "the one who causes desolation" is necessarily the so-called 'anti-christ'? These things aren't even implied in the words of Gabriel, they are later fabrications of men. [edit on 1/7/08 by shaell]
Originally posted by shaell
Originally posted by Sky watcher
reply to post by shaell
1993 - 2000 was a time of relative peace and prosperity (as opposed to the so-called "tribulation" forecast for these prophetic events).
The internet came of age. Clinton balanced the economy. Prosperity was abundant. Hope ruled. The Hale-boppe comet flew over. Another comet struck Jupiter in plain sight of Earth. The Phoenix lights marked the very central day that the "daily sacrifice" was cut off (March 13, 1997).
How could the daily scarifice be CUT OFF when they have yet to be reinstated as they were in days of old? Exactly what sacrifices are you alluding to?
Originally posted by shaell
Specifically, the day and hour of Christ's return can not be known