Objects in our orbit - Can this be REAL?

This link was sent to me via my friend Jeff Rense and if it is not a fake then this is VERY disturbing:-

www.rense.com...

The creator says that he has invented a way of enhancing the view of a normal telescope and has found a number of "vehicles" in and around Earth's orbit. Whilst some are obviously satellites, others most definitely are NOT.

Take a look and post your comments in this thread as I will discuss it on tonight's show in hour 2.

Ross

I watched the videos, and i must say very interesting. I wonder how he was able to record sound using a satelite. I thought there was no sound in space. I also wonder how he was able to keep the "space things" in frame, if they are in orbit. Not sayin they are fakes, but untill we can get a clearer picture of them, its hard to say exactly what those things are.
Someone should launch up their own camera into orbit and take film of all the crazy stuff flying around up there.

There are some other threads around on this subject.

My question is why do these things look so transparent? Do the aliens like a good view of the Earth? Or are they just doing a lousy job of cloaking?

I have since seen an e-mail from someone who claims to have worked with the guy that took the photos (John Lenard Walson), and says that this is NOT his real name and that he now questions his mental stability and believes he was in it for for a "$5 Million film deal" which never came off, and now doubts the validity of the photos.

This of course could be "sour grapes" from someone who was "cut out of the deal" - but on the other hand it could prove the photos to be a hoax.

It's an interesting one and I think we'll need to keep an eye on developments.

Ross

i think this is the most recent thread before this one. I'm still not sure on the whole issue myself, but he claims to have better quality pics but he want money in exchange for them.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I think if the guy wants credability he should make his best stuff available... assuming he has better images. I e-mailed him about an hour ago and am waiting to see if he replies. Santamonicajohn@hotmail.com

It's funny how we are cloaking tanks and making other things invisible but these so called aliens who are way ahead of us in technology keep showing up in these videos. And then we have others that are shiny silver, some with lights etc.. Just makes me wonder if they are real videos or pictures if it's just human technology. I have no clue, but they keep popping up everywhere.

I think it's a bunch of poo!!
This more of Walson and Gridkeepers attempt to hoodwink everyone. There is enough threads on it.

The guy (Walson) is claiming he can film artificial deep space objects with a 8" reflector and a digital camera!!! Why build Hubble then?

Someone has started a thread asking them if they could produce an identifiable picture of the ISS..and they have not done it yet. So for me, if you can't take a picture of something that is there (you can see it's shape in a telescope from Earth...and certainly with an 8" reflector), then one must have huge dollops of doubt about any other claims..IMHO.

Just 2 Euros

looks to me like these could be the ISS from different angles

dunno, just a thought

I don't mean to be rude but
someone talking is not proof of anything


reply to post by nomadrush

---

Some of them look a bit like the ISS. But according to Walson's speech at the last Probe conference, not all of them are in orbit. Some of them are "stars". I wonder what mainstream astronomers make of this! I was going to ask him, but never got the chance. If these things are light-years away and yet their shape is still visible by telescope you can imagine how big they are!

What are they?

I'm assuming you read the other threads about this.

This guy isn't even capable of taking a clear picture of the ISS, while others with the same telescopes can. So why should pictures be MORE credible simply because they are LESS clear?


BTW: This same guy now has a video on YT, of two aliens in T-shirts over a table, taken from above, with some "scared" breathing for sound.

Of course this video was put through extreeme torture, to make of as low quality as possible.


Also, he has videos of classic shape UFOs, which are of course blurry, but then the camera shows the window frame and it becomes obvious that the "UFOs" are blurry simply because the camera is focused on a very short distance. (the window frame)


Now i would like to know, why anyone filming UFOs would override the cameras auto-focus to manually set it at 1m, except to make them appear blurry on purpose?

If you were taking a video of UFOs, wouldn't you want to get as clear a picture as possible?