CIA Torture Jet wrecks with 4 Tons of COCAINE, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 44 times


reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 06:41 PM by crowpruitt
reply to post by Boondock78


You beat me to the punch Boondock,lol,seriously though you are right.The feds win in all areas of the drug trade.They import,sell to dealers,then bust the dealers and confiscate their houses,cars ,boats and other expensive 'toys'.Then they auction these off to the highest bidder.Man,theres lots and lots of money involved there.I believe that Gotti said that the reason the mob doesn't deal in drugs is because they can't compete with the government.


reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 08:22 PM by birchtree
reply to post by johnlear



John, I have heard that this jet might have departed from St. Petersburg. I think that with a pair of dividers and an air chart we could delve into this further. Assuming we do have the origin and the point of impact you can use the average cruising speed as a mean and the max fuel that it departed with in a way to assess a type of connect the dots. It is plausible.
Unless the keys are in the car(Flight plan)

As far as black ops game, I think everyone (lacking the Ostrich Effect) can say that there is a place for this in national security. I AM NOT DEFENDING THIS> I am just stating that is does have its means, I am finding some of it hard to swallow as the bases are pretty well covered when it come to outsourcing, for plausible deniabilty purposes

I know weve talked about this before under a diff auspice, but I do not think people understand about the peoples economy in Afghanistan and how the poppy fields are being used by the Taliban to offer farmers advance loans and then when Government troops destroy them it puts a bad spin on our (the US) direct relations with influencing the population to provide information on activities.

[edit on 15-12-2007 by birchtree]


reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 08:25 PM by birchtree
reply to post by CharlesMartel



but flight plans do have to be filed, we do not have to prove who was initiating the flight, just the fact of the locations of the flight plan can be very telling in the re-creation of events



reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 08:34 PM by LoganCale
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Never mind the mainstream media.

How about just one credible source.

Just because you found it on the internet doesn't mean it's true.

Just one credible corroborating source.

That's all I ask.


If you visit some of the other threads I linked to at the bottom of the first page of this thread, you'll see a number of posts I have made with hard evidence backing them up—bills of sale and registration documentation directly from the FAA and so on. If you're referring to evidence of CIA involvement, there is no hard evidence. The most interesting evidence at this point is the co-purchaser's involvement with the DEA, FBI and CIA. If you check back in a few weeks, I should have some new records that may shed light on any past connections, but I'm not expecting much. Unlike others, I'm not claiming the CIA was operating this aircraft at the time of the crash, nor am I even claiming there is any government involvement at all.

Originally posted by CharlesMartel
That site says "possible" flights for the CIA. There is no proof that any of the charter flights are for the CIA.


You are quite correct that it does not confirm a CIA connection, however, if the aircraft did fly to Guantanamo Bay, that is a U.S. military base, and the aircraft had to have had some sort of government connection at the time it landed there, if it did in fact land there. It could have been a military flight, it could have been flying an official or a politician down, it could have been a government contractor, but it had to have had some sort of official business at that time in order to land there. If it did land there.


reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 08:55 PM by resistor
reply to post by Rasobasi420



True that. All part of divide and conquer.

Originally posted by Skyfloating
We all learned on Miami Vice, that if you want to wage a war on drug-lords, you have to have a few undercover rats, a few who become just like them, do what they do, get close to them. Isn’t at least part of the feds & agencies involvement with drug-trafficking linked to that?


An interesting point, SF. Perhaps that's how it began, with infiltration. It seems certain though that at some point a tipping point was passed with the love of money overtaking the desire for justice.


reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 11:37 AM by johnlear
Originally posted by birchtree


John, I have heard that this jet might have departed from St. Petersburg. I think that with a pair of dividers and an air chart we could delve into this further. Assuming we do have the origin and the point of impact you can use the average cruising speed as a mean and the max fuel that it departed with in a way to assess a type of connect the dots. It is plausible.
Unless the keys are in the car(Flight plan)


Thanks for the post birchtree. My opinion is that the CIA oversees the production and distribution of the major portion of illegal drugs in the world. It always has and it always will. After all, who do you want in charge of that kind of money? Some nut like Dr. No? Of course not.

Governments throughout history have controlled the drug trade, why do you think illegal drugs are illegal? They are a constant cash flow. So forget about dividers and airpseeds and fuel loads. It was an accident and accidents will happen.

I estimate that 90 percent of the U.S.'s illegal drugs enter via Gitmo. It would be major refueling stop from South America. There are many places to go from there where you won't be bothered by customs checks.

I know weve talked about this before under a diff auspice, but I do not think people understand about the peoples economy in Afghanistan and how the poppy fields are being used by the Taliban to offer farmers advance loans and then when Government troops destroy them it puts a bad spin on our (the US) direct relations with influencing the population to provide information on activities.


The U.S. controls the major portion of the cultivation and production of the opium poppy in Afghanistan. If the Taliban is caught dealing they get killed. Its our product. We paid for it with American lives, American technology and American cash. We need every dime made on illegal drug sale and distribution and anyone caught trying to cut themselves in on our deal are going to get a great big fat B-1 right up their butt.

Butt thanks for the post.



reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 12:02 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by johnlear



Thanks for your post, John.

Right now, I'd rather be riding a horse under a blue sky with white fluffy clouds.

[edit on 16-12-2007 by goosdawg]


reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 01:35 PM by Papillion
reply to post by johnlear



John, I mostly always enjoy reading your posts. I guess we really have all gone to pot. Its' so overwelming the depth of the treachery, the height of these walls. A man alone, that is what I am. Sit back and enjoy the ride.

LGF.


reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 02:47 PM by HongPong
Hey everyone, I'm pretty new to ATS but stuff along these white lines has been a subject of personal interest to me. It's great to find out on this thread how you can look up flight plan records and other things.

In any case I want to share probably the oddest, but most illuminating thing I have heard from a government employee this year, about how this aircraft registration stuff works.

I asked him (back in January) about another CIA-linked coke plane, which Hopsicker dubs "cocaine one," and what the deal was.

This plane did not have a current owner. Its FAA registration was suspended. So i asked the Govt Dude if there is some kind of archaic loopholes to the FAA's registration system.

He told me that indeed, basically the FAA was set up from the get-go to let the elite hide aircraft ownership thru loopholes. By flipping crafts back and forth between shell companies, if one gets caught during its drug flight, responsibility vanishes. And this has happened numerous times during the Bush regime. (then he told me about personally searching for a missing iran contra pilot 20 yrs ago, FAA burned the flight records! This was the first govt employee I ever asked about this stuff!!!)

Essentially what we're looking at here is the "central banking financed warfare" system funnelling max cash into the CIA's friends on Wall Street. Everything gets back into the System. I feel nowadays that 9/10ths of the "big illuminati master" conspiracies are really just arrays of front companies. If you want to be a master, get good at setting up shells. Enron, Savings and loan scandal (a subset of Iran Contra fraud really), all these things involve tons of East Coast Country Club Cabal front companies.

I'll name a few key sources for my view on this:
Wayne Madsen: seems a little crazy sometimes, but really his angles are turning out to be true quite a bit.
Katherine Fitts: lookup Narco Dollars for Dummies, the stuff about RJR Nabisco selling cigs to Mafias, etc. Dillon Read, Dyncorp, Pug Winokur and the Harvard Endowment, Prison Industrial Complex, the Tapeworm economy = the 'wastes of money' = profits!!
Daniel Hopsicker: I agree with someone's comments above, that he jumps to conclusions. However it's still damn fine footwork around the Florida Corruption Morass, and "Barry and the Boys: the CIA, the Mob and America's secret history" is a must-read to get a handle on how the Good Ol Boys operate in a higher realm to do what they want. Once you're making enough cash on it, any money laundering penalties are just a percentage to the Feds.
Al Martin: his book "The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran Contra Insider" was a difficult book to read, but totally indispensable and unique, helping me to understand how Martin himself, a "fourth level player" in Iran Contra, specialized in setting up the hordes of interlocking front companies, Trinity Oil and Gas, he was in the room when Oliver North ordered the hit on Barry Seal, etc. This book is very badly edited and the chapters seem out of order, but you can really grasp the texture of how it worked then and obviously still works now.
Also of course NarcoNews.com is the straight dope on current happenings.

Other than that, well I've decided that most drug conspiracies (especially those of the moneyed old school: talking about YOU, East India Company!) involve less than 20 entities, and many times the Elite are too lazy to alter their standard fraud patterns, as Martin stresses.

Thus, i've had enough, and I purchased SecretAirlinesSuck.com and FakeWarOnDrugs.com and when i get a little time I am going to put the Drupal CMS on there so everyone can chart classic drug conspiracies as series of nodes to discredit the whole system. Who's with me? (thanx and you guys have a great forum)


reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 03:04 PM by LoganCale
Originally posted by HongPong
I asked him (back in January) about another CIA-linked coke plane, which Hopsicker dubs "cocaine one," and what the deal was.

This plane did not have a current owner. Its FAA registration was suspended. So i asked the Govt Dude if there is some kind of archaic loopholes to the FAA's registration system.

He told me that indeed, basically the FAA was set up from the get-go to let the elite hide aircraft ownership thru loopholes. By flipping crafts back and forth between shell companies, if one gets caught during its drug flight, responsibility vanishes. And this has happened numerous times during the Bush regime. (then he told me about personally searching for a missing iran contra pilot 20 yrs ago, FAA burned the flight records! This was the first govt employee I ever asked about this stuff!!!)


I'll agree that the system—intentionally or otherwise—does make it quite easy to confuse who exactly owns an aircraft at a specific time, however, I do have a correction regarding N900SA (Cocaine One, as Hopsicker refers to it—a name I personally dislike, but that's neither here nor there).

N900SA certainly did have a current owner at the time of its capture, we just don't know who it was,
because it was exported to Venezuela. Once an aircraft is exported, the FAA no longer cares who owns it. However one odd point regarding N900SA—in my experience of looking at FAA records, there generally is a bill of sale to the foreign purchaser included in the file. Not so in this case, only the above cancellation letter was sent.

It's also possible, as has been suggested by Hopsicker and others, that the above letter was backdated, as it was faxed to the FAA by the final U.S. owner on April 11, a day after the aircraft was caught by the Mexican government, despite the letter being dated April 7.

[edit on 16-12-2007 by LoganCale]


reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 03:22 PM by HongPong
reply to post by LoganCale



Thanks for the correction, I was going off the cuff there. maybe it was Cocaine Two. But it all indicated to me there is a "big something" there... It seems like you can find dozens of these fronts in the same general areas of Florida constantly, from the 1970s to today.

Bonus factoid: janet Reno was the US Attorney for Miami at the exact time Southern Air Transport was operating at Miami International. The press called her "do nothing Janet," at least according to Martin.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags