It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the Republic of South Africa, the Cape Fur Seals are considered "res nullius," meaning they have no owner, and therefore, they have no animal rights protection, as they are not considered Sentient Beings......
The Cape fur seal has been a protected species since 1973 under the Sea-bird and Seal Protection Act (Act 46 of 1973) but, ironically, this act was never written to protect them, instead its purpose was to control who killed them commercially. South Africa only suspended culling and clubbing of the seals in 1990. After their independence, Namibia has continued to club 60,000 baby 8-month old seals and shoot 7,000 bulls for their penises.
Most animals in Britain are stunned. Bailhere's Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary (1988) defines it as "producing unconsciousness of head in carbon dioxide, gas, electrical shock ... all of them aiming to allow the animal to bleed out while it is still alive. An animal that is dead before it has bled out will be unsuitable for marketing."
Large numbers of animals are slaughtered rapidly in an assembly line. Chickens are lifted by their legs when they are fully conscious. Their heads are immersed in water to make electrical contact, but some flutter and are not stunned. Chickens and pigs are subjected to scalding water to remove their feathers and hair. When stunning is not done properly or exsanguination has not progressed enough, a significant proportion of animals is burnt before going unconscious.
But it's not like you cow hunting with a hammer is it, and then call it a sport?
A captive bolt stunner is a device used for stunning animals prior to slaughter. It can also be called a cattle gun or a stunbolt gun or a stunner. The stunning is essential to prevent the pain and suffering of the animal through the bleeding (exsanguination) process (which is itself necessary to prevent meat spoilage).
I honestly can't see how anyone with a heart could possibly do that to something so adorable. Isn't it bad enough that millions of cows and pigs and chickens are being slaughtered every day? And now little seals? How much meat do we need? It's awful.
Originally posted by TheDuckster
Criminals on 'death row' will receive a humaine ethical and 'painless' death...
...Far more than these defenseless-creatures of the wild.
Good post Chikey!
~Ducky~
Originally posted by testrat
In some US states it is still legal for electric chair, shooting, and hanging as a method for euthanasia for a human. Not sure about Canada.
I took 25 whitecoats (newborn harp seal pups). Back then, there were no regulations, or government laws that banned killing the baby seals. It was much harder for me to do that. When you approach the babies, they become scared and tuck their heads into their bodies to protect themselves. It was terrible. It hurt my heart. But I didn't have a choice. Either I followed through to become a part of my Dad's crew, or I didn't, and I would go home for good. But I wanted to be part of the crew, so I did it. On the way home, he didn't say anything about my first outing with him and his crew. My mother asked him how I did, and she told me he was impressed. "You done good,” was what he said.
In 2001, a report by an independent team of veterinarians who studied the hunt concluded that governmental regulations regarding humane killing were neither being respected nor enforced, and that the seal hunt failed to comply with Canada's basic animal welfare standards. Shockingly, the veterinarians found that in 42 percent of the cases they studied, the seals had likely been skinned alive while conscious.
Parliamentarians, journalists, and scientists who observe Canada's commercial seal hunt each year continue to report unacceptable levels of cruelty, including sealers dragging conscious seals across the ice floes with boat hooks, shooting seals and leaving them to suffer in agony, stockpiling dead and dying animals, and even skinning seals alive.
In 2002, the Canadian government knowingly allowed sealers to exceed the quota by more than 37,000 animals. Sealers had already killed substantially more than the quota allowed by May 15 (the regulated closing date of the seal hunt), and yet the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans chose to extend the sealing season until June. In 2004, sealers killed close to 16,000 seals more than the permitted quota. Again, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans extended the sealing season until well into June.
Originally posted by Paresthesia
Read that and tell me it's solely for the purpose of food. Tell me it's not a sport, an activity, a lifestyle just like hunting deer in the US. I don't believe in killing for fun. I believe in killing to eat but not for sport which this clearly is and you're lying to yourself to say it isn't.
In 2001, a report by an independent team of veterinarians who studied the hunt concluded that governmental regulations regarding humane killing were neither being respected nor enforced, and that the seal hunt failed to comply with Canada's basic animal welfare standards. Shockingly, the veterinarians found that in 42 percent of the cases they studied, the seals had likely been skinned alive while conscious.
Parliamentarians, journalists, and scientists who observe Canada's commercial seal hunt each year continue to report unacceptable levels of cruelty, including sealers dragging conscious seals across the ice floes with boat hooks, shooting seals and leaving them to suffer in agony, stockpiling dead and dying animals, and even skinning seals alive.
The last two quotes are from the Humane Society of the United States website. I suggest you read the article I linked to. It will answer all questions and address all misinformation.
[edit on 18-12-2007 by Paresthesia]
Originally posted by anxietydisorder
shearder....
Don't worry, you and I have no problem between us.
We just stand on different sides of an issue, and our differences only open up the topic for further discussion. Any hot topic on the absolute rape of our planet is worth the time spent learning all sides of the argument.
I hope I didn't single you out in my replies in a bad way, but your posts just seemed to be the most worthy of a reply. Sometimes I'll be the "Devil's Advocate" in a thread just to push a topic.