It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Why did building 7 fall?

page: 14
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 08:23 AM

Originally posted by albie

If you are making such a bizarre statement from such an ambiguous medium then you will never really be making any sense to me.

You are allowing your views on Bush and america in general to sway your opinion of this event.
I don't like Bush, but I don't allow it to sway my opinion.

The building was MOST LIKELY felled by damage and fire.

Is that right? You are certainly entitled to your opinion. Apparently, you have only opinion. Who are you to be so rudely critical of anyone else's statements ? Your opinions do not entitled you to make statements, regarding people views, when you have no idea what those views entail or why. There are ways of disagreeing with people which do not involve being so curt.

posted on Dec, 22 2007 @ 12:34 PM
I love it how you CTers can take a single sentence and blow it up into some
massive conspiracy , First "PULL IT" means several things in the fire
service. We speak of "pulling a line" - taking a hose off our trucks to
the fire. "PULL IT" means get your Ass out of there! Fire Departments do
not blow up buildings Try and get that through your pointy heads!

Silverstein was not even on the fireground when Chief Nigro called. The call
was made in mid afternoon, by that time it was oblivious the building was
beginning to shift. In the fire service when the structure starts to move and
shift it is sign to get out fast as building is unstable and liable to collapse
with little warning. The surveyor transit they had positioned to monitor
the building was telling them it was shifting . I heard the radio calls from the
scene going out around 3pm telling everyone in area that collapse zone
around WTC 7 was being set up. Nigro was not asking permission
to blow up the building, he was informing Silverstein that because of the
collapse danger all operations around building were being halted and
personnel/equipment moved back out of the way.

posted on Dec, 22 2007 @ 09:24 PM

Originally posted by albie
I've refuted everything you've said...
...Your argument is too weak.

You have? You must have been posting in stealth mode cause I haven't seen it, has anyone else? Help me out here...

Whatever your take on Larry's statement is purely your opinion as is mine, but the physics I bring up are not opinion but fact. So instead of focusing on things you think you can easily refute, but make no real difference to the big picture, how about getting back to the physics you keep ignoring...

My argument is too weak compared with who's? Yours?

Do some research on larry, demolitions, and the laws of physics, you'll learn a lot more than you will at sites like 911myths...

posted on Jan, 1 2008 @ 09:30 PM
Thanks for all who contributed in the thread, it has been very interesting to read all sides and what you all think.


new topics

top topics
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in