 |
|
Topic started on 12-12-2007 @ 09:53 AM by HHH Is King
|
I want to know something. Even on here, a pedophile republican is protected, defending, promoted. One was asked to run for president and did(lost),
another was promoted to head of abused and missing childrens committee. Another was made head of the GOP Party! Not to mention theGOP running a
child sex ring out of the White House in the 80's and another in Texas when Bush43 came into power.
But... If the same person were to come out as gay... "Burn! Kill!" house fire bombed, family shot, neighbors killed, guy dragged to death behind a
truck. Bomb the city block with million dollar missiles.
Why? Why does the GOP, even on here, protect and defend pedophiles but hate and discriminate against the gays? Why does a gay senator told to step
down from office while a pedophile senator is asked to run for president?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-12-2007 @ 10:47 AM by nyk537
|
Just thought I'd provide a few links for you to read over.
Mike McHaney - Democratic Child Molester
Andrew Reed - Democratic Kiddie Porn Leader
List of 13 Other Democratic Perverts
Sure there are some evil Republicans out there, but there are just as many Democrats. Don't come around here lumping an entire group of people into a
category of perverts or pedophiles. We're trying to "deny ignorance" here, not breed it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-12-2007 @ 11:26 AM by HHH Is King
|
List of nearly a hundred, known, including info on 2 child sex rings ran by republicans.
www.armchairsubversive.org...
Also, you forgot to mention in your links that those democrats were punished, not asked to run for President.
See, like with the church, it isn't that the priests rape children it is that the other priests, cardinals, bishops, and even the pope himself
protected the pedophiles.
Dems caught, punished. Reps caught, run for president.
[edit on 12-12-2007 by HHH Is King]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-12-2007 @ 11:34 AM by nyk537
|
Yes but running for President isn't the same as being elected President...
Clinton Legacy
Either way, we could post links back and forth all day and get nowhere. The point is that true, there are many people ON BOTH SIDES who commit crimes
and do disgusting things, that's a fact of life. This doesn't give you the right to claim that all GOP members are pedophiles are stick up for
pedophiles though.
That's the same kind of hateful rhetoric that those of you on the left claim not to spew.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 06:42 AM by HHH Is King
|
And once again we have a "Bill Clinton had sex with consenting adults! So its ok for the GOP to rape 5 year old boys!"
And the ever classic.
"Yeah, but they weren't gay! Just pedophiles!"
Sad
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 07:32 AM by nyk537
|
I didn't mention either of those things. Did you even read any of the link?
It had nothing to do with that.
I'm wasting my time here. I'm done.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 07:44 AM by slackerwire
|
Could you post the date of conviction of this sick bastard alleged pedo running for President?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 09:04 AM by HHH Is King
|
Originally posted by slackerwire
Could you post the date of conviction of this sick bastard alleged pedo running for President? 
Yoiu mean Strom Thurmond, a GOP Senator, who wasa raping and impregnated a 14 year old black girl while running on pro segregation? Haven't you been
listening? The GOP doesn't punish, the protect and promote. You see the democratic pedos going to jail but not the republican ones, no, they're
asked to run for president or made head of the Abused and Missing Childrens committee.
Also, again Semp thinks I'm a democrat so by providing links to Democrats going to jail(Being punished not protected) I will somehow stop exposing
his Gods as the child rapists that they are. Sorry, not a dem, or a rep, but a conservative. Something you nor the GOP has been for decades.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-12-2007 @ 05:45 AM by xpert11
|

Really this pointless partisan bashing thread is a sign of how far AP is slipping if it isnt pointless threads like this one its Ron Paul mania.
As for the topic corruption , criminal elements and just plain sickos span the political spectrum enough said.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-12-2007 @ 02:16 PM by The Cyfre
|

reply to post by xpert11
I don't think Ron Paul mania is specific to AP, it seems to have infected a pretty significant portion of the internet. How that translates to real
voters is another story, one we'll have to wait to hear the end of.
I do agree though, xpert. How does any of this help anything? We're supposed to be on the same side. I'm sick of Democrats and Republicans who,
instead of trying to better their own party, would rather focus on spewing hate for their opposition. The mud slinging has to stop or there will be a
split in this country.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 04:17 PM by deadbang
|
Slightly off topic, but germain to the discussion, this is something that I have become aware of since taking a job overseas, three years now...
What I noticed is that since Bush's second election victory, the U.S. (my home country) has become a very hateful place politically...the center
ground seems to have been completely erased...both sides openly hate each other and say and do some of the most contemptable things to each
other...
In the past, politics was about finding the middle ground and both sides working to better the country, regardless of who is in charge at the time.
Now it just seems that whichever party is in office, it becomes the resposibility of the also rans to slander and lie as much as possible.
And the grassroots involvement is what surprises me...politicians have always done this...but now if you read just about any site that allows
talk-back, comments...it's the regular joe who is calling slandering, using profanity, insulting people for nothing more than not seeing theings
their way.
I find this most troubleing of all...the voters have lost site of bettering the country, they just want their candidate elected...damn the country!
my2cents...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-1-2008 @ 06:05 AM by HHH Is King
|
What is so wrong about this question? I believe it is a very legitamite question. Why is a gay Senator told to resign for being gay but a pedophile
one told to run for president? Why are pedophiles so revered by the GOP yet gays are discriminated against? Why whenever a GOP gets into the White
House a child sex ring is formed but they try their best to make gays 3rd class humans?
So again, why does the GOP(Far from Conservative mind you, hasn't been for decades) discriminate against Gays but protect, defend, promote
pedophiles?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:38 AM by HHH Is King
|
Anyone? Will no one from the GOP step up and answer? Why is a gay senator told to resing while a pedophile one asked to run for President? Why are
gays treated worse then animals but pedophiles made head of the abused and missing childrens committee or GOP Party Leader?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 07:25 PM by The Walking Fox
|
reply to post by deadbang
What needs to be understood is that in America, the Democratic party is the "middle ground". The party has been dragged pretty far from its
previous liberal position, into a more corporate / right-wing apologetic position. It's why we are essentially a one-party system. One party is the
abuser, the other is the battered spouse with stockholm syndrome.
Now, speaking as someone who's pretty heavy to the left, I have no real interest in watching a centrist party try to "compromise" with an extremist
one. Which is exactly what we see in American politics. I feel we need to pull the centrists back towards the left, and then we can talk about
compromise, possibly reaching a more level middle ground.
Also something I've noticed... Liberals are angry at conservatives for conditions on the ground brought on by conservative voters and the people they
elect. On the other hand, conservatives are angry at liberals because Bill Clinton got a blowjob and we don't want Pat Robertson to become grand
Ayatollah of America.
[edit on 8-1-2008 by The Walking Fox]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 12:54 PM by Dr Love
|
Originally posted by HHH Is King
Dems caught, punished. Reps caught, run for president. 
To me it boils down to the power structure behind the party. Economic power, military power, and power over intelligence agencies (specifically
having more dirt on your opponent than he or she has on you). We've all heard it before, the military-industrial complex. That is and will always be
the Republican base. How in the hell did the "wide stance" Senator from Idaho keep his job? All the crap about the Republicans running him out of
the Senate was just a show for Joe Republican. There was never any real intention of running him out. It was just an illusion meant to fool Joe
Republican into thinking his party still held the moral high ground. Hell, they even marched Tom DeLay out there and he was actually able to turn the
negative media coverage around and fuel the illusion of a "liberal" media. That's the real genius of the GOP. And predictably, regarding Larry
Craig, in time people forget and don't care anymore. They go back to sleep right on cue.
Personally I believe the more powerful are always the more twisted. They're more twisted because they can be and the consequences are
minimal.
Peace
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 11:07 PM by HHH Is King
|
Well, I think its less complicated.
You rape children, you don't want to get caught. What do you do? Slap a NAMBLA sticker on your car or go on TV and declare yourself the leader of
Moral Majority?
You molest your own daughter, do you support pedophilia or do you go on TV and declare all gays are pedophiles and we need to exterminate them?
So the pedos, the freaks, flock to the GOP.
But that's not the end of it.
Even if every Republican was a pedophile(They aren't) it wouldn't matter if when caught were arrested and punished. But when caught the GOP has
them run for president, make them head of Abused and Missing Childrens committee, head of the GOP Party, protect them with tax payer money to defend
them in court, run child sex rings out of the White House(1980's) or Texas(2000's) and worse.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-1-2008 @ 12:36 AM by semperfortis
|
As my name came up in this thread
 Also, again Semp thinks I'm a democrat so by providing links to Democrats going to jail(Being punished not protected) I will somehow stop
exposing his Gods as the child rapists that they are. 
And seeing as I have never read it before, I thought it only polite to reply.
I thought this germane to the discussion...
Interesting to say the least...
 Those Who Protest Too Much are Seen as Guilty
Ben Yandell
University of Kentucky
160 students listened to a tape recording in which a target person was or was not accused of damaging a typewriter. The target person either denied
damaging the typewriter or admitted damaging it, or the tape was stopped before his response was heard. Observers rated a target person who denied
having damaged the typewriter as more likely to be guilty when his denial occurred in the absence of an accusation than when his denial followed an
accusation.
PSP
 Contemporary cognitive models of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) assume that clinical obsessions evolve from some modalities of intrusive
thoughts (ITs) that are experienced by the vast majority of the population. These approaches also consider that the differences between “abnormal”
obsessions and “normal” ITs rely on quantitative parameters rather than qualitative.
Science Direct
 An obsession is not the same as a compulsion. Compulsions are forms of deterministic behaviour (the ways that the person acts in situations that
he cannot cope with). These kinds of behaviour have their main origin in guilt and anxiety. Obsessions have their main origin in fear and
jealousy.
Obsessions
Troubling stuff here...
Semper
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-1-2008 @ 07:10 PM by HHH Is King
|
I see, calling me a pedophile... Yes that's a way to show you have nothing left. Good job, your Gods fall, you insult me. And have been alerted.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-1-2008 @ 07:57 PM by spacedoubt
|
Originally posted by HHH Is King
I see, calling me a pedophile... Yes that's a way to show you have nothing left. Good job, your Gods fall, you insult me. And have been alerted.

hmm, interesting response. very interesting.
methinks thou has protested juuuuust the right amount for 4 out of 5 psychologists to reach a conclusion..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-1-2008 @ 08:10 PM by The Vagabond
|
First of all, Semperfortis has only posted once in this thread.
NYK537 was the one challenging your contentions.
Second, I can see why you would read those external sources as you did, but they could just as easily be suggesting that you are a closet Republican
(which might explain why Semperfortis is being so docile- trust me, I've seen the guy debate).
Anyway, I'll cut to the chase- this Whole Thread seems founded on accusing people of pedophilia, and that is quite distasteful. It would be
greatly appreciated if both sides could take a deep breath, and ask themselves if they honestly believe that anybody else in this thread
is a pedophile. God willing, the answer is NO.
After realizing that, let's continue the discussion in a nice civil manner, so that we can explore the reason that certain people's offenses or
alleged offenses were handled as they were, whether or not the handling was appropriate, and whether that infact reveals any flaw which is peculiar to
a single party. All of that can be done without anyone in this thread being accused of either being a pedophile or turning a blind eye towards such
offenses.
In a word: chill.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |