It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Skepticism of 9/11 Truth is Denial for Comfort Sake

page: 1
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 10 2007 @ 11:09 PM
link   
If people still think the towers and the 3rd building fell on their own... there's no helping them.

I just wish the 9/11 movement could move on. The only people denying the evidence anymore are on a mission to either keep themselves, or keep others from accepting the fact that 9/11 was another Reichstag. It's denial for sake of comfort, and I'm tired of it.

For the most part, communities of 'skeptics' who consider science to be the only valid rule - are denying the scientific evidence presented by experts that 9/11 was controlled. This leads me to believe that they are either incapable of accepting the evidence mentally, or emotionally.


Mentally, people are more comfortable with the simple explanation that 'Muslims hate our freedom so they bombed us.' Emotionally, I believe they are incapable of admitting that there are criminals running this country and that they killed thousands of us to start a war.

These are the same types who will laugh at the idea that G.W. Bush had a Nazi grandfather, or that both John Kerry and George Bush are members of a satanist secret society. These are the same people who will shake their head when you show them footage of world leaders performing mock-sacrifices at the Bohemian grove. Denial for the sake of comfort.

There are very evil people manipulating this country, people evil enough to kill thousands of us and put themselves into CEO positions for the war-machine that carries out our mis-guided revenge on the Middle East. People evil enough to do business with Osama Bin Ladens family while sending us to Afghanistan to look for him, only to give up and 'forget' he existed and march us into Iraq. People evil enough to keep us in Iraq, killing children and ruining peoples lives when the majority of the planet wants us to end this madness.

If people this evil exist (and they do... and you know who it is) - how is it so hard to imagine that they would purposefully allow 9/11 to happen? Not every person involved in the U.S. government is 'in on it', but the major players ARE and we have got to wake up and realize this. If other people are still incapable of realizing it - LEAVE THEM BEHIND.

The 9/11 truth movement is about one thing - uncovering the beast. We caught the beast red-handed, yet years later we are arguing amongst ourselves because some of us are too afraid to admit that the beast is real. If you believe 9/11 truth, than you are not afraid to admit it. Leave the others behind.

Sorry if this comes off as a rant.

[edit on 10-12-2007 by NewWorldOver]




posted on Dec, 10 2007 @ 11:23 PM
link   
Great post


I think the proponents of the official story fall into 4 categories:

1. Those force fed on MSM and Fox News, that seem to choose to act like "knights", blindly defending the latest angle they willingly invited to have rammed down their throats.

2. Those who have political, or financial interests lying firmly within the official story being taken as gospel.

3. Those who have dug themselves into a hole by defending the official story, now knowing after looking at so much evidence that they were wrong, but unable to voice it.

4. Those who simply do not care.

I think the majority of the "officialists" are in unfortunately 1 and 4. IMO, all 4 types of people fall under "denial for sake of comfort", in one form or another.



posted on Dec, 10 2007 @ 11:28 PM
link   
As I stated on the other post, if there was indeed a controlled demolition (and I'm not saying there was or there wasn't), why is the U.S. government automatically accused as being the culprit?

It is pretty obvious the attacks were carried out by Islamic terrorists. And being that they were responsible for previous attacks on the towers via bombs, what's to say they were not responsible for the controlled demolitions as well?

The September 11th attacks were planned out meticulously. If there was a controlled demolition to completely bring down the towers, Occam's Razor would dictate the ones who performed the attacks were the same ones who planted the necessary bombs.



posted on Dec, 10 2007 @ 11:56 PM
link   
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


That's a very condescending attitude to have. You assume that because the questionable "facts" being presented by the truth movement aren't convincing that the people who don't believe in them are somehow defending an oligarchy. The truth is that the methods employed by the "truth movement" smacks of adolescent attention grabbing. I understand that there are anomalies about what happened that day that don't seem to be explained. My concern is whether these anomalies actually add up to complicity of the United States government or those who just love to hate "the establishment" so much are using these anomalies as an opportunity to cry foul.

What's really silly is that the same people who have screamed so loudly about conspiracies and secret societies are the ones who turn around and cry that we need socialized medicine administered by that same government. I personally think this whole governmental structure has run its course in this country. It's time that we hold a mandatory retirement of every representative and senator as well as every federal judge. Our representative government is suppose to be a group of statesmen. Instead we get career politicians. There's not a congressman in this country (on the federal level) who isn't wealthy by any definition. Their only goal is to continue to enrich themselves and their own interests.

The problem with connecting that duplicity with the events of 9/11 is that those events would have required too much risk. There were a hundred ways to get us into another war if that's what they were after. You think that if another truck bomb or barracks bombing or USS Cole (type attack) would have occurred that they couldn't have taken us to war? Why would they need to coordinate an attack of this size? Further, even if they coordinated the airliners crashing into the buildings, why would they need to collapse the buildings?

I think it's easier on some people's minds to imagine a vast conspiracy to explain 9/11 than to accept that there may be people out there who just don't like us very much. If you're going to make the leap that the Muslim extremists WOULDN'T want to attack the US, you have to also consider that there have been attacks of varying degrees of severity and success for three decades. Has 9/11 been in the works since the 70's?

Don't assume that because a weak argument doesn't convince some people that those people lack intellegence or heart.



posted on Dec, 10 2007 @ 11:57 PM
link   
reply to post by AshleyD
 


I don't know how you can apply Occam's Razor to the CD theory and come up with Islamic terrorists planting demolition charges in the WTC's... Have you thought about this?

I don't personally think it was the "US Government", far too much to try and cover up, there would be too many people involved.

But it could easily be a compartmentalized group, or handful of individuals, or, a private group of individuals.

There are a large amount of people who would end up profitting from what happened on 9/11, Occam's Razor would point to those who stood to gain the most from bringing the towers down - the terrorists would actually stand to lose the most. If they were clued up enough to carry out these attacks so meticulously, don't you think they'd have knowledge of the kind of repercussions that would face them afterwards?



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 12:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by StudioGuy

I think it's easier on some people's minds to imagine a vast conspiracy to explain 9/11 than to accept that there may be people out there who just don't like us very much.


No. The only people who consider this a 'vast conspiracy' are the skeptics.

As I said, some people will never be able to wrap their minds around the sacrifice of 3,000 people by criminals running the government. But these criminals are the current white house administration. These criminals are out in public, covering their tracks, feeding us lies (WMD's anyone?) and these criminals are RELYING on people to say the exact same thing you did "It's just a conspiracy theory. The muslims hate our freedom. We need to stay in Iraq and kill insurgents because it's the right thing to do.'

Critical thinking is a must. I am done pandering to all the people who still believe the official story. The 'terrorists' who flew those planes were part of AlQeida which is an organization CREATED BY THE CIA.

To this day, people believe Al Qeida is the enemy and are incapable of recognizing the real puppet masters. Like I said : LEAVE THEM BEHIND.


I just want to throw in another thought:

If you can watch this video and see anything BUT a man who is lying - you are the 50% of the nation that is helpless and will believe anything it is told. This is a speech DESIGNED to brainwash people and put them into emotional states of denial, and he gave it hours after knowingly allowing 911 to happen. Every single word is a lie, fabricated to bring about an emotional response.


*sigh* youtube.com... It would be great if these embeds worked.

If you think this man was being sincere or honest in any way. I don't know what to say.

I am just glad there are so many of us in America who knew that something was wrong the moment he opened his mouth and declared vengeance on an unknown enemy. WE KNEW that we were being lied to, we just didn't know to what extent. Now the 9/11 movement is in full swing and we are positive who the culprits are. It's not ALL government - it's these CRIMINALS who are running the government, stealing offices, and stealing elections.

Done.



[edit on 11-12-2007 by NewWorldOver]



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by adjay
 


What I mainly have to go on are the phone conversations from flight 93. It pretty much disproves the theory of remote-controlled planes and other ideas. It is pretty obvious Islamic terrorists hijacked the planes. I agree with you that it would call for a massive cover up had the U.S. government been involved. As they say, get seven men involved in a conspiracy and be assured that one will talk.

Undoubtedly there are those who would have profited financially from the attacks and we can entertain all sorts of conspiracy theories ranging from the possible to far fetched. However, Occam's razor does apply in my opinion. If we can believe terrorists performed the attacks, as the majority of hard evidence points to, then to begin to assume others were involved becomes a complex conclusion and not the most obvious conclusion that Occam's razor mandates.

It is true this terrorist act would bring down strain on Islam in general but so has all the other acts they have executed throughout the decades- and that has never stopped them. When you truly feel you are on a divine mission (as they believe), then earthly consequences wouldn't faze you.



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 12:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by adjay
 


What I mainly have to go on are the phone conversations from flight 93. It pretty much disproves the theory of remote-controlled planes and other ideas. It is pretty obvious Islamic terrorists hijacked the planes.


Sigh. 'Islamic terrorists' as in CIA controlled Al Qeida operatives? Yes.

Like I said, they have manipulated the basic emotions of Americans, showing us footage of the planes crashing over and over, along with pictures of stereotypical muslims. They have even made MOVIES about the heroic passengers of said planes to remind us over and over 'it was terrorists, islamic terrorists. innocent people died. it was terrorists. they were muslims'.

I'm sick of it. Sick of hearing the same thing from people. The first method of mind control is repeatition - it really works. They released controlled information like the tapes from airplane, and it gets gobbled up and regurgitated years later as 'proof' that 9/11 was angry muslims and nothing more.
If the government can fabricate disinformation so sucessfully, what hope do 9/11 truthers have in converting the 'skeptics'? None. Like I said, leave them behind.

All the people who believe the hollywood, romanticized version of a highjacked plane? Leave them behind. I'm talking to 9/11 truthers.

[edit on 11-12-2007 by NewWorldOver]



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 12:30 AM
link   
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


It's terribly insulting to effectively be called simple minded for not taking the loose conglomeration of "facts" that keep getting tossed around by the "truthers." The truth movement has never been more fractured and ineffective than it is right now and that's not going to change. Eventually the group of children who think they're changing the world with youtube videos will tire of it and move on to the next thing that makes them feel grown-up. Then a little while later a new group will come along and use the claims of their predecessors as proof of what they're now saying. It's a viscious cycle. We actually see this same cycle in our government. Politician 1 does something bad, gets away with it. Politician 2 does something else bad, uses the response to politician 1's bad thing to explain away his bad thing. Politicians 3-10 do something far worse that 1 did but it doesn't even make the news. Isn't it ironic that the very "criminals" you claim to have the power to bring down are the ones whose pattern you imitate?

I think it's time for the truth movement (this version of it anyway) to piss or get off the pot. If you're as organized as you think and you have these mountains of evidence and experts in your ranks, then it's time to bring charges in some form other than an ATS thread or youtube video.



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 12:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by StudioGuy
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


Eventually the group of children who think they're changing the world with youtube videos will tire of it and move on to the next thing that makes them feel grown-up.


Your arrogance is staggering. Another affirmation that skeptics are in denial.

Go and study the 9/11 movement. Go and read how many seasoned officials and scientists can present evidence for controlled collapse. Go read how it is impossible for steel structures to 'melt' in the simple-minded way folks are still imagining the buildings to have collapsed. Go and study, yourself, and then you can sit down with 9/11 truthers and call them children.

Until then, you're just another nay-sayer who insists that the 9/11 conspiracy is somehow insulting to your intelligence, as opposed to the fact that you are still clinging to a laughably inconsistent official story which has already been dissected.


Like I said, the 9/11 truth is beyond all of this. The facts have been debated endlessly. You either believe the cabalists who run this country knowingly sacrificed us for the cause of war, or you DON'T. The people who do not believe have such an innate daddy-mommy complex with their government that they will do anything to deny it all as a vast, implausible conspiracy theory. It is denial for the sake of comfort.

[edit on 11-12-2007 by NewWorldOver]



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 01:21 AM
link   
What does it take to bring the World Trade Center down?

One bomb? Ten bombs? A single plane? A single plane, ten truck bombs, four car bombs, three particle cannons, two cruise missiles, a partridge in a pair tree, and the kitchen sink?

First, it was was 'something other than the planes we were told' hit the WTC. Then, it turned into remote controlled airplanes. Then holograms covering for missiles/bombs. Then we had all kinds of other hooprah. Now after everything else has been exhausted, we're back to "it was CIA actors who hijacked the airplanes and blamed it on AQ."

So... let's assume you knew about this going on. Quite a few people would have had to be involved in this operation for it to go down like you seem to think it did.

How much would I have to pay you to be quiet? Would a thousand dollars do it? Ten thousand? Your daughter just died in that attack.... maybe I could pay you off with a couple million, or a promise that you'll be my right-hand man when I take over the world.

Would you stay quiet? With the money the media would be willing to pay to run with such a story... the way the Bush administration is criticized, already - it'd be the nail in the coffin for everyone opposed to him. The government paid you ten million to be quiet.... now you turn around and get paid fifty million to go to the mainstream media with this - with evidence for it (a huge lump-sum deposit into your account, a nice, big check; something).

And that is if it's all about money. Obviously - you couldn't be paid to keep quiet about such a thing. You're not that corrupt. .... So what makes you think that many people out there are also corrupt to the point that they would accept such an exchange?

This isn't about 'truth'. It's about feeling special - feeling superior to the rest of the population - not just "I know something you don't" - but "I stand for more than you do - I have more of America running through my blood!"

I would also like to see these "experts" who believe 9/11 was a controlled demolition. Not "looks like" not "as clean as" - I want to hear them say the words "It had to be a controlled demolition." Bonus points if the "expert" can prove they work in demolition (particularly with explosives).

Then, for your own learning adventure, I encourage you to go read up on the process by which you prepare for controlled demolitions, and watch the videos of large buildings being demolished via explosive charges - then compare it to the footage of 9/11.

The only similarities are that the buildings fall in on themselves. The WTC does this because of the steel mesh structure that forms its exterior and provides for roughly 40% of its support. It acts as a nice 'tube' for the rest of the structure to fall into, and pull down on top of itself as it goes (which is exactly what you see happening, if you watch the videos).



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 01:34 AM
link   
reply to post by NewWorldOver
 


Just a bunch of regurgitated harping from you. Your whole premise is an ad hom attack on anyone who doesn't buy into your theories. You assume that I haven't read or spoken to people with titles and letters after their names who can so effortlessly explain away these "facts" that you're repeating.

You ignorantly wave your hands in the face of opposition as opposed to actually presenting evidence. That's no surprise because you don't actually have any evidence, you just THINK you have evidence. You THINK you know something about structural engineering because somebody else told you.

Steel melting? Didn't need to MELT, only needed to soften. When does steel begin to soften?

If you have a case to present, do it. Otherwise, you need to leave the hard stuff to the grown-ups.



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 01:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by StudioGuy
That's no surprise because you don't actually have any evidence, you just THINK you have evidence.


I never said I have evidence. The research has been done. I already told you, to go and study yourself.

You are in here stamping your feet and denying 9/11 'theories' instead of educating yourself. This is what the MAJORITY of skeptics have been doing for years, and I for one, think we should leave the lot of you behind.



If you have a case to present, do it. Otherwise, you need to leave the hard stuff to the grown-ups.


Yes. Plugging your ears with your thumbs and shaking your head is HARD work isn't it? It certainly gives you all the right in the world to be so pompous and arrogant as to speak to me like I'm a child.


To be so helplessly ignorant and unwilling to educate yourself leaves makes it hard to take you seriously. You, like Skeptics in general seem to be amazingly lazy people
I have done my research. Go do yours.


[edit on 11-12-2007 by NewWorldOver]



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 02:20 AM
link   
NWO... I've been researching this topic long before you were aware of it, I assure you. And... I keep finding my research pointing me towards 9/11 not being a coverup...... now why might this be?



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 02:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Aim64C
NWO... I've been researching this topic long before you were aware of it, I assure you. And... I keep finding my research pointing me towards 9/11 not being a coverup...... now why might this be?


Why would you ask me to explain your own conclusion? 9/11 has not been covered up, just used as justification for a ridiculous occupation. The way in which our 'leaders' jumped into Afghanistan and then somehow steered us into Iraq, as a consequence of 9/11, was nothing short of ridiculous, and reeked of oppurtunism that had been planned in advance.

If you believe the towers collapsed on themselves after being hit by a plane, the idea of a cover-up is a moot point to begin with. But there was no cover-up. And those towers didn't collapse by themselves.



In any case : this forum is overflowing with information as to WHY we believe 9/11 was allowed to happen, or even why the black-government orchestrated it. GO and read it. This thread is about how little skeptics have offered the 9/11 movement. We have not been convinced of the governments innocence, and the skeptics will NEVER be convinced of the governments guilt. I'm leaving it at that. You skeptics can continue your pointless tirade against a movement which has no need for you.

[edit on 11-12-2007 by NewWorldOver]



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 02:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Aim64C
 


I think the real problem with you guys that aren't convinced that a least certain elements somewhere in the US government had to be involved, has to do with the way your mind works. I get tired of reading the same stuff over and over again.

It seems that you guys have a difficult time with stringing multiple thoughts together at the same time. To you this whole conspiracy thing seems ludicrous because your mind is not connecting things together properly as they should be. You jump to one conspiracy right to the next without trying to understand a connection. So you see a VAST conspiracy that would take thousands upon thousands of people to pull it off a remain silent.

All it would take is a hand full(if even that) and agents who are sworn to complete secrecy like CIA, Mossad. But your mind is not able to understood that type of simplicity.

Your simplicity relies on 19 hijackers over taking 4 airplanes without any inside help, except Bin Laden living in a cave some 10,000 miles any, 3 planes hitting there intended target. Then 3 WtC towers come crashing down completely, pulverizing 1,2 to fine powder. To you, this is "logical", this is what your mind can comprehend. But in reality this "logic" was fed to you and you ate it up without question.

I don't really bother convincing people about the towers or the other oddities that day. To me, just the fact that Cheney and Bush would not testify under oath, and would only give information together behind closed doors to the 9/11 commission, this should be enough evidence, to a rational thinking person, that this administration is hidding something, hence inside job.

And now the CIA destroying evidence and lying about even having it in the first place to the 9/11 Commission. It's only getting deeper and deeper for you guys, it's it?


[edit on 11-12-2007 by Conundrum04]



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 02:44 AM
link   
So, which is it?

So far, from you, I've seen controlled demolitions, CIA-controlled/involved hijackers, and 'allowed to happen'.

You still haven't answered my question from before..... we're talking something that would involve thousands of people...... why aren't they speaking out? Why aren't they showing evidence that the government attempted to pay them off? Or do you believe that humanity, in general, is so corrupt as to accept money for silence in such situations?

And, you have already explained my conclusion. I am "plugging my ears and going 'lalalalala' to the 'truth'" - that's why I don't see any 'fatal problems' with the official story behind 9/11 ... or, at least... according to your previous posts.

So, why change your story, now?

And, honestly, I don't need any 'justification' to go to war with just about any country in the Middle East other than we are bored and want something to do. My personal opinion. And, to be honest, we already HAD the justification with numerous bombings of our embassies, ships in foreign ports, and the usual statements from those countries, wanting to offer their lawn-care services... something along the lines of "sea of fire" .... I like my amber waves of grain... thanks.

And, really, if you want to know why we targeted Iraq - it's rather simple. What is the largest military power in that region? Iraq. Iraq is also one of the countries we have the most intelligence data about; and, because it's one of the largest military powers in the region, it has rather complete facilities for a number of military operations. There are airfields, ports, storage facilities, roads, barracks, etc. It may not be the best Bed&Breakfast in the world... but - it's much more complete than operating out of, say, Kuwait, and more effective than flying out of Diego Garcia.

In short - if you don't like the war over there... you better just lock yourself in your room and start punching your mattress... because we just set ourselves up to take on every country in that region.

I'll also let you in on something else. All of the branches are making massive recruitment efforts for the reserve forces - known as "surge force capability". The reserves are far cheaper to maintain, and allow us to place a lot of manpower in-theatre very rapidly - perfect for short two-week missions designed to incapacitate countries like Iran and Syria.



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 03:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Conundrum04
reply to post by Aim64C
 

Your simplicity relies on 19 hijackers over taking 4 airplanes without any inside help, except Bin Laden living in a cave some 10,000 miles any, 3 planes hitting there intended target. Then 3 WtC towers come crashing down completely, pulverizing 1,2 to fine powder. To you, this is "logical", this is what your mind can comprehend. But in reality this "logic" was fed to you and you ate it up without question.


Excuse me?

I am routinely responsible for intelligence-related tasks in my day-to-day activities.

Do you even know how terrorist groups act? It is not based around our common command structure or small-unit tactics. It is very, very simple... yet expanded to a level of near infinite complexity.

I have someone in Delta airlines. His job is simply to relay to me flight times and schedules. I also have another guy in an airport as an official. His job is to simply observe the behavior patterns and tendencies of his coworkers at the metal detectors, and report them to me. I pass this information up to someone else. That person takes information from a cell that has someone inside of a taxi service... they simply receive orders to be at a location at a certain time, and to pick up someone of a certain description.... otherwise - they are a normal taxi driver. That same cell has an informant in the FAA and passes down various bits of information - which get fed up through the neural network and processed.

People may be involved in the cell, and may not even realize they are part of it. A friend of their simply asks "what went on at work today"? They talk to their therapist (who is involved in a cell) about stresses at work.... any number of things.

These are people who believe they have a duty to the cause they believe they are serving. They could have contributed to 9/11 and never known it.

Even back when the CIA was dang near omniscient, back in the 60s and 70s - the USSR had thousands of spies inside of America - and we had thousands of spies/informants in their country.

The CIA is hardly even present in today's world. It was decapitated, along with our military forces, following the collapse of the soviet union. So, a terrorist network could VERY easily propagate through the U.S.



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 03:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Aim64C


Do you even know how terrorist groups act? It is not based around our common command structure or small-unit tactics. It is very, very simple... yet expanded to a level of near infinite complexity.

So is it simple or complex? You're very confusing

So I guess you're trying to say on a micro level, it's simple. Macro - complex. Okay, I think that's real basic stuff here.



I have someone in Delta airlines. His job is simply to relay to me flight times and schedules. I also have another guy in an airport as an official. His job is to simply observe the behavior patterns and tendencies of his coworkers at the metal detectors, and report them to me. I pass this information up to someone else. That person takes information from a cell that has someone inside of a taxi service... they simply receive orders to be at a location at a certain time, and to pick up someone of a certain description.... otherwise - they are a normal taxi driver. That same cell has an informant in the FAA and passes down various bits of information - which get fed up through the neural network and processed.


I guess you are giving me an example of how a terror cell would operate. I'm not show why however.


People may be involved in the cell, and may not even realize they are part of it. A friend of their simply asks "what went on at work today"? They talk to their therapist (who is involved in a cell) about stresses at work.... any number of things.


So everybody can potentially be in a cell, even your therapist. Okay, I'm following you.




These are people who believe they have a duty to the cause they believe they are serving. They could have contributed to 9/11 and never known it.

Even back when the CIA was dang near omniscient, back in the 60s and 70s - the USSR had thousands of spies inside of America - and we had thousands of spies/informants in their country.


Okay, deception, lying, backstabbing. It was sure a crazy time back then.


The CIA is hardly even present in today's world. It was decapitated, along with our military forces, following the collapse of the soviet union. So, a terrorist network could VERY easily propagate through the U.S.


Yeah, the CIA is basically a fading agency that will be going out of business sometime real soon.


I really don't see how any of this has anything to do with what you responded to, but you actually strenghtened my point without realizing it.
Say you are basically saying that the hijackers had help inside this country. Okay, so who are they? Apparenty Missoui(sp?) was the only one charged and convicted with a connection. Who else was invovled? I would like to know, wouldn't you?

So now, since you clearly understand how terror cells operate. What is the most likely explanation? 19-20 arab gun-ho hijackers acting alone? Or 19-20 arab hijackers getting help inside the U.S. by some other source?



[edit on 11-12-2007 by Conundrum04]



posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 04:03 AM
link   
It's quite simple - I was providing explanation for how the government would not be necessary for such a thing to arise.

Now, let's say someone murders my wife... supposedly. The person who is responsible is someone who took out a lawsuit on me four years ago and it was settled for four thousand dollars.

Suspect... isn't it? That person is now tried and convicted of murder and sentenced to death (we'll say we have a vengeful jury). I am also left as a single father with three children under the age of twenty-one. Because of federal regulations, I receive $500 a month to assist in providing for my children, and since my wife was in the military and had SGLI benefits - I receive a $400K life insurance return and due to the untimely circumstances of her death, I receive a portion of what her base-pay was.

That's pretty darn suspicious... wouldn't you say? I really made a bunch of money on that one.

You can connect the dots however you want to. You can choose to include every dot, or leave a few out ... however you want to do it, to form your version of reality.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join