posted on Dec, 13 2007 @ 01:05 PM
Originally posted by kozmo What you perceive as insults are merely personal observations. Typically people who are insulted by
another's personal observations are so insulted because they recognize some truth in the observation with which they cannot reconcile in their own
If my personal observation insults you, so be it. That wasn't my intention. My intention was to share with anyone interested what my views are on
secret societies et al.
Let me demonstrate your absurdity:
You are an arrogant, pompous little whiner who is determined to blame your own problems on cabals of satanic masons which are nothing more than a
figment of your imagination. You need to find meaning in life, so you do it by acting like your above everyone else. You are pathetic. You like to
attack groups you know nothing about so you can feel better about yourself. You are a failure.
Now - kozmo - what you perceive as insults in the above are merely personal observations. If you feel insulted by my personal observations you are
insulted because you recognize some truth in the observation which you cannot reconcile in your own mind. :down:
Originally posted by kozmoI STILL find it pathetic that people cannot engage on this endeavor on their own. To me that is great
weakness and demonstrates a profound lack of will. If, as stated, the true nature of such societies were to become better, stronger, better more
philanthropic people then organizations like the Salvation Army would LOVE to have you and you would still accomplish your stated goals. The reality
is that philanthropy and personal growth are at the bottom of the priority list for these people regardless of what they say.
You can find it pathetic if you want, lets just hope that you are not a member of any civic organization, church, or university. Because if you are,
your being a hypocrite. But you haven't answered those questions because it would reveal you for what you are. Stop throwing stones from your glass
house. Also, I would like some evidence that people working as individuals can produce more in the name of charity and good works than groups. This is
AT THE FACE OF IT a lie. Do you know WHY such charity and philanthropy exists? Because people pooling money and working together achieve more good
than people working alone.
Originally posted by kozmoEdited to add: Your fallacious non-sequiturs regarding churches or institutions of higher learning are
laughable. The last I checked I was welcome to walk through the door at any time and share either in learning or worship sans secrets. The purpose
of higher learning is education and churches worship - secret societies foster neither. In fact, both churches and learning institutions offer
philanthropic opportunities and personal enrichment opportunities and dispense of both EQUALLY and without prejudiced. The very fact that your is a
"Craft" makes it that much more laughable.
And yet again we see this anti-mason has nothing but ad hominem attacks and logical fallacies. Logical fallacies committed by you in just this thread:
sweeping generalizations, false dilemma, ad hominem circumstantial. You should check out my Anti-Mason thread, I cover all of this for you in that
You must not have been to too many universities or churches. I know of no university which lets you come in and start "sharing" your views with a
class you are not a member of, nor do I know of any church where you can come in and start worshipping in whatever way you want. It's time for you to
go out in the real world, little one.
But - wait - what's this - churches and higher learning institutions offer philanthropic opportunities? But you've just told us thats all laughable
because we should all be doing the same things on our own. You should really learn how to construct an argument and not contradict yourself. It's
I have to say, brethren, this anti-mason is probably the easiest one yet. Its just too easy. Is this guy one of the masons posing as an anti-mason to
demonstrate their complete stupidity?