It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A judge's decision not to jail nine men guilty of raping a 10-year-old girl in an Aboriginal community has triggered outrage in Australia.
The offenders were either placed on probation or given suspended sentences for the 2005 rape in the Aurukun settlement, in northern Queensland.
In her ruling, Judge Sarah Bradley told them that the victim "probably agreed to have sex with all of you".
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
This is absolutely revolting. Most straight-thinking human beings could never contemplate such a thing; no ten-year old girl would willingly agree to have sex with multiple men.
It is hard to fathom what was going through the judge's head at the time. I can only think of two scenarios, though I admit I have no evidence for either of them. One -- Judge Bradley is one of those far-far-far-left individuals who think children having sex is okay and should be encouraged. Or, Two -- She harbors some racist attitudes and thinks because the victim and perpetrators are Aborigines (ie; not as intelligent or civilized as whites), they don't know better and couldn't help themselves.
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
Uhh, I dont think political offiliation has anything to do with this case. Im left in my politics, some would say im far left. But i would never think such actions are acceptable and should be encouraged, nor do I know anyone who would think this way. To top it off, Ive never heard any left leaning political speaker suggest that such things are ok.
I think you are biased and uneducated in the matters of left politics.
Originally posted by forestlady
They call it "the age of consent" for a reason - namely, because no one under the age of consent can be considered capable of making a "decision" to have sex, with full understanding of what they are agreeing to.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Rather, people holding such beliefs seem to gravitate towards the left, just as people possessing racist attitudes tend to gravitate towards the right (this may be because of the left's acceptance of sexual liberation politics).
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Ok, so explain the Right's apparent predilection towards homosexuality, if American politicians are any indication. One can just as easily pull that statement outta their butts, and support it on the same basis as yours.
any anthropologist and they'll explain it to you in the appropriate jargon, but sorry Scooter...ya can't blame everything on the Clintons!!