It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by masterp
Hey, let's put gays in an island on the pacific, and then anihhilate it with a 1000 atomic bombs!!!
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
The government has the right to do what the people want. If you think the majority of people want gay marriage then you are living in the wrong places.
Simple as that. No pro/anti gay stuff. I could care less about them one way or the other.
Religion or not, polygamy is not against the bible, but yet we have made a definition that excludes them. The people have the right to define that which we live by.
If they say no, then it's no.
Originally posted by alternateheaven
Has anyone ever thought about this from a financial point of view yet? A gay couple who wants a child has to adopt due to the obvious physical limitations. A lesbian couple can adopt or if they are so inclined go through artifical insemination. Hetero copuples can hatch out children left and right with out any diffculty. Could it be possible this is partially an economic move to keep people having children to create future consumers at a rate acceptable by the rich who want to stay rich?
I think homosexuality may be an evolutionary reaction to the ever increasing number of births coupled with the extended life-spans of adults thanks to technological advancement. We are quickly becoming overpopulated and it makes sense that nature would react to counter the problem, as it always does.
Answer this. Should polygamy be allowed? Should NAMBLA marriage be allowed? Should Animal Husbandry be allowed?