Ultimate proof that Ron Paul is from the NWO agenda, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 12:19 PM by Jibbs
reply to post by Paul the seeker



Before I can believe this you'll need to prove to me that there is a NWO.
Thanks in advance.



reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 12:30 PM by jtma508
reply to post by Paul the seeker



Let's try this from a different angle. I wholly disagree with your hypothesis as well as your 'evidence'. That said...

Which candidate (if any) are NOT part of this NWO conspiracy? What public figures in your opinion are trustworthy and why?


reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 12:34 PM by Paul the seeker
Originally posted by Jibbs
reply to
post by Paul the seeker



Before I can believe this you'll need to prove to me that there is a NWO.
Thanks in advance.


However i can not teach you the sense of the obvious, but anyways here is the proof:

www.youtube.com...


Let's try this from a different angle. I wholly disagree with your hypothesis as well as your 'evidence'. That said...

Which candidate (if any) are NOT part of this NWO conspiracy? What public figures in your opinion are trustworthy and why?


Governments main function is to do the management, blind people from real events and control them.

I am free. And i am not willing to vote for any person to govern me and to decide what is right and what is wrong.
I do not and you should not trust any candidate or take their policy serious simply because the large forces of corruption will soon take over that.

It is an illusion that today is better than 1000s of years ago in another aristocracy. Just like in those times, most people are unaware of what's going on.



[edit on 10-12-2007 by Paul the seeker]


reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 12:53 PM by Paul the seeker
Originally posted by eyewitness86
The OP is so weak that I cannot believe he is serious. Ron Paul an NWO lackey because a few prominent people are shown with varying positions of their fingers in photos? " I feel like I am taking crazy pills !!" Remember that line from Zoolander? Thats what I feel like when I see a post like this.

What POSSIBLE relation is there between Ron Paul..the NWO..and the different and largely innocent or explainable positions of the fingers on the hands of well known people? It makes NO sense. Bush always says he is a Longhorns fan, and that is the sign for them. But if you want to believe that world leaders get a kick out of openly flashing secret hand signals to other members of some secret cabal to show their contempt for us and mock our inability to respond, then help yourself. For one, I believe that if there ARE any secret hand signs that high level evil rich men use for whatever reason, they are not used in public, but in very private places where they could not be seen doing so.

At that level, they do not play games with their lives and fortunes by being flippant about matters that would have to be secret as hell. No way. So, we are left with you showing a coolection of peopls hands with a headline that has no bearing at all on reality: PROOF? THIS is what you call PROOF of Ron Paul being an NWO stooge? Hand signs? I guess only outrage could account for the number of comments, as otherwise this one is worth skipping.


Ok i will give you couple of reasons why i believe Ron Paul is not what he claims to be.

but something by the way, most illuminati consider this a game. And they will stop nowhere.

a) Ron Paul DENIES that 911 stinks to hell. Everybody knows it's an inside/illuminati etc. job and not some jallah-jallahs highjacking the plane and flying it 45° side-rolled into the towers like a pro.
The funny response of Ron Paul is : " I believe we should re-investigate..."
Wow, research the case? It has already been done thousand times. Liar

b) Ron Paul pops up right when the public is most desperate.
Coincidence? He adresses all the people's problems and hate to the state and makes great promises ( haven't all those presidents done that ? )
That is how all the great government traps through the ages have been.

c) Would an agenda of 1000 man let 1 man against them, blow up all their plans of the century? You seriously believe they would let him take over the whole situation? Well that would be a lil naive to believe if you ask me.

I really suggest you do some little research, i shall discuss with you whilst some are not even knowing what the NWO is even about.

Do you seriously believe who the masses elect is who will rule over america?
That is the most ridiculous thought i ever came across.

[edit on 10-12-2007 by Paul the seeker]



reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 01:49 PM by Jibbs
reply to post by Paul the seeker



Thanks, any chance you could direct me to their official web site? I'm sure they must have one, I just can't seem to find it.




reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 02:05 PM by CyberTruth
reply to post by Paul the seeker



I have to agree with you on the point that there is no way one person - even if he is the president can fix the mess our Government and the country is in.

Nobody can undo the countless years of plundering and corruption that has been going on for the last 50 -100 years. At this point, I'd be happy with someone who could just manage to stop the bleeding!

It would take a serious Act of God to repair the damage that has been done to our World by the types people who would gladly kill you if the price is right.

This election is about saving your own soul as much as saving your own country. We have no choice but to accept these politicians at face Value - Who is telling the truth? Who has the best record? Who's actions match what they are promising?

I am voting for Ron Paul because he appears to be the most honest and genuine of all the candidates. I don't know what he really thinks about 911 but the man is taking enough heat as it is. Coming out on 911 might be a death sentence for any politician - I haven't seen one yet admit they thought it was an inside job.

I am voting for Ron Paul because I have to. He represents the issues that are real and that make sense to me. - If he turns around and betrays everything he represents now then wow you were right. But at least I know I tried to do the right thing based on all the information I had. Ron Paul might be a NWO secret card but we don't know that for sure - We can however say with relative Certainty - that everyone else running is a NWO puppet and these other candidates make no bones about it. They are all CFR members and they have all sold out to the interests of lobbying corporations. At least Ron Paul does not appear to be a sell out.


Also, the media and the GOP are trying awfully hard to silence him - That to me is a good sign - When the Corrupted try to smite someone it is usually because that person does not play by their rules.


So honestly what do we really have to lose by Votiing for Ron Paul?

Nothing at all - and if he is genuine then we have everything to gain.





[edit on 10-12-2007 by CyberTruth]


reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 02:18 PM by anhinga
reply to post by NGC2736



...agreed, on all points. And the only way to get this unfounded, alarmist and untrue thread settled -- is for everyone to see the OP photographic example.

Three fingers, big difference.

Normally, I don't put a lot of stock in the hand 'thing' but since Junior Bush did the two (Satan or a football team) at an actual 9/11 ceremony, I've been taking more notice of these things.



reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 02:40 PM by kozmo
Originally posted by Paul the seeker
Just consider me some 18 year old who has no other interest than performing research in what's happening?

My name actually is a coincidence and i don't work for any company.

And I am personally sorry for you being a Libertarian Constitutionalist ( not an offense! )

[edit on 10-12-2007 by Paul the seeker]


Is your first sentence a question or declaration If it is a declaration, then please do enlighten me as to what your "research" has uncovered. More to the point, please describe research in context to
the Scientific Method. What controls did you use when gathering your data? This way we can assign a level of validity and reliability to your research.

Finally, I am wondering why you would be "Personally sorry for [me] being a Libertarian Constitutionalist"? A Libertarian is defined as:
1. One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state.
2. One who believes in free will.
A Constitutionalist is defined as:
1. One that believes that Government power is distributed and limited by a system of laws that must be obeyed by the rulers.
2.
a. A constitutional system of government.
b. Advocacy of such a system.

The two terms together mean that I am one who believes in maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state to that which is specifically outlined in the Constitution.

Your statement that you are personally sorry that I hold such beliefs would lead me to surmise that a.) you are not for maximizing individual rights; b.) you do not believe in limiting governmental powers to that which is stated by the Constitution; c.) both a and b; d.) you have absolutely no idea what a Libertarian Constitutionalist is; or e.) you feel sorry because the state of politics has regressed to a point where neither libertarianism nor Constiltutionalism are observed by either party. Which best describes the premise of your apology? Thanks for your reply.


reply posted on 10-12-2007 @ 03:23 PM by Paul the seeker
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by Paul the seeker
Just consider me some 18 year old who has no other interest than performing research in what's happening?

My name actually is a coincidence and i don't work for any company.

And I am personally sorry for you being a Libertarian Constitutionalist ( not an offense! )

[edit on 10-12-2007 by Paul the seeker]


Is your first sentence a question or declaration If it is a declaration, then please do enlighten me as to what your "research" has uncovered. More to the point, please describe research in context to
the Scientific Method. What controls did you use when gathering your data? This way we can assign a level of validity and reliability to your research.

Finally, I am wondering why you would be "Personally sorry for [me] being a Libertarian Constitutionalist"? A Libertarian is defined as:
1. One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state.
2. One who believes in free will.
A Constitutionalist is defined as:
1. One that believes that Government power is distributed and limited by a system of laws that must be obeyed by the rulers.
2.
a. A constitutional system of government.
b. Advocacy of such a system.

The two terms together mean that I am one who believes in maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state to that which is specifically outlined in the Constitution.

Your statement that you are personally sorry that I hold such beliefs would lead me to surmise that a.) you are not for maximizing individual rights; b.) you do not believe in limiting governmental powers to that which is stated by the Constitution; c.) both a and b; d.) you have absolutely no idea what a Libertarian Constitutionalist is; or e.) you feel sorry because the state of politics has regressed to a point where neither libertarianism nor Constiltutionalism are observed by either party. Which best describes the premise of your apology? Thanks for your reply.


Alright this is all too much for me i can't react on.

I also saw many posts on things i already replied on.

But to give you some of my personal reasons,

a) politics support money

money=evil money->materialism=evil

b) I don't think the constitution was ever in the meaning FROM ppl FOR ppl.
c) Freemasonry surely had had great influence on constitution. Anyone who is not an unconditional Freemason lover will find out where the higher degrees have themselves STINKING.
d) I don't believe in free will aslong as human-civilization is concerned. History proofs it, you know it.


And there are other reasons that i think would be too far out to post here.


But one last time as for the 2 finger vs 3 finger salute,
if bill clinton did the 3 finger salute, do you really think he mean that he loves you?



A fellow Bushman..


[edit on 10-12-2007 by Paul the seeker]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Rothschild Speaks: Want\'s One World Currency
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags
ACTA and You - Important Video - It has Begun
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags
Know Thine Enemy! Iran Warns of Coming Great Event.
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags
Overpopulation is a scam
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags
Obama/Soros Pushing Class Warfare
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags