(hollow earth) I plan to go to the hollow earth, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 26 times


reply posted on 12-10-2008 @ 02:21 AM by Phage
reply to post by All Seeing Eye





Did he ever return?
No he never returned.
And his fate is still unlearned (poor old Charlie)
He may ride forever 'neath the streets of Boston
He's the man who never returned.




reply posted on 25-10-2008 @ 09:19 PM by All Seeing Eye
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by All Seeing Eye





Did he ever return?
No he never returned.
And his fate is still unlearned (poor old Charlie)
He may ride forever 'neath the streets of Boston
He's the man who never returned.
Hey, lets face it, if it exists, and it considers itself to be its own continent, country, or castle, or home, you just don't go barging in! That would be so rude. Hey, how about me coming over to your house and just kick the door down, and invite myself in. That will go over real well.

Okay, so if it exists, and it turns out to be the garden of paradise, Edin, don't you think the same etiquette is still proper? In my mind, if it exists, it is proper to wait for a invitation, not just barge in.

Maybe they don't want a bunch of ingrate's dirtying up there carpet........

And if it is Edin, try thinking about why you got thrown out in the first place!


reply posted on 4-1-2009 @ 04:02 PM by lambros6
reply to post by ANTHONY33


Check out a vid i posted on youtube..Hole in the north pole.
Go to the site on the vid and you,ll see that for the past couple of months, satellite photos clearly show a hole in the noth pole.
The site has photos dating back to 1979 and I cant find ( up to now) any photos showing anything similar.


reply posted on 4-1-2009 @ 08:24 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by lambros6



Wow that's an interesting claim.....what keeps all the water from pouring in?

Just asking questions.


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 01:02 AM by coredrill
He can never ever go to hollow earth because hollow earth does not exist.

I am am member of another forum, in which, for a thread on hollow earth, a poster gave a wonderful scientific explanation as to why the earth is not hollow. Here is the matter



Actually if you ask a geologist and they say "we think" earth is hollow they should request their money back for their degree. They will say "we think such and such is at the core", but not that the earth is hollow, baring they are crazy.

Actually were are going to do two things. First we are going to calculate the weight of the earth with good ol newton.

So I am going to assume you are familiar with Newton's equation for the force exerted by two objects upon each other.

equation 1: F*=G(m1m2)/R2

So G is the universal constant for gravitation.( 6.67 x 10-11 m3/kg s2), So from now on when I use G, I am going to be referring to that number.

Knowing that,
equation 2: F=m2a we will plug that into equation 1 for F*

equation 3: m2a=G(m1m2)/R2

Now for this, m1 is the mass of the Earth, m2 is the mass of an object on the surface of the Earth, a is the acceleration of that object near earths surface which we know to be 9.8 m/s2.


I am going to assume that you have basic algebra skills and can solve for m1 in equation 2.
And we end up with this.

m1=aR2/G

So now our only problem is finding the R, which is radius of the earth. Now to save time, and my fingers, I am going to give the radius of the earth, 6.38x106 meters. If you are interested in calculating the R of the earth using shadows on your own click
HERE

Anywho, back to the problem at hand, now that we have all the varriables lets plug and chug.

m1={(9.8 m/s2)(6.38x106 m)2}/ 6.67 x 10-11 m3/kg s2, solving we get the mass of the earth me= 5.98x1024 kg.

Now that is heavy! Far to heavy to be hallow, but lets not stop here.

We have our trust old density equation D=M/V.

Now since we have calculated the mass and we did (well faked) our shadow experiment to find the radius, R we can solve for the density of earth.

We need to remember how to find volume of a sphere, (heres a good point to clarify notation, for Pi we will use p), (4/3)pR3

So plugging it all in we get

D=(5.98x1024 kg)/((4/3)p(6.38x106 m)3 and we get?

5497.3 Kg/m3 which we can quickly convert to the standard density unit g/cm3, and have 5.497 g/cm3

Great but what does this tell us?

Well for one we know that the most rocks on the surface of the earth have the density 2.7 g/cm3, water is approximately 1 g/cm3 and Earths upper mantel (peridotite) is about 3.4 g/cm3.

This tells us that the center cannot be hollow and actually has to be something much more dense.

Now we can test this experimentally as well and will be doing so shortly many mechanisms using Neutrinos have been proposed and while they may not match our radial based density calculation I am sure they are not going to support the "Hollow earth" theory.

Anyway here is one example.
Probing the absolute density of the Earth’s core using a vertical neutrino beam






[edit on 4/3/09 by coredrill]


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 06:18 PM by Pegasus Pryme
If someone is going to trust modern science to explain our world then maybe we should take in considiration the fact that science as we know it is a form of control that keeps u traped in one dimensional way of thinking and prevets wonderfull discoveries and inventions. In the last houndred years numeros inventors, scientists, and thinkers that expanded mind beyond the brackets of traditional science have discovered ways to cure cancer, produce polution free electricity, illiminate fossil fuel dependance and also a way of propoltion that is unparalell to todays technology. So here we are calculating equations by the exemple of Isaac Newton without thinking for a moment that Isaac Newton did not know everything,he just found a way to relate the world HE KNEW to the science of his time. Not to mention the fact that he was a Free Mason which is (illuminati) which is one of the reasons why our world is in the sad state of affairs. The textbook on physics, chemistry and quantom phisycs are in the state of perpetual change, which means that our scientists are constantly finding mistakes and information previously overlooked inside and outside those textbooks. So u see we dont have 100% exact science to fall back on. As far as probing earth with a beam, how do we really know that inner sun would or would not have the same density as imaginerry metal super duper dense core. Also I would not trust for a second anything that Governments have to say at all, EVER! So my friends chalenge anything u hear with ur own invistigation and research not to mention an opend mind.
Sweet discoveries ya all!
P.S. Im Russian so never mind the spelling just try to catch the though!


reply posted on 5-3-2009 @ 11:04 AM by thomas_
reply to post by coredrill



I see your point and I don't buy that the earth is Hollow, but how in the hell "your" calculations prove anything for a fact if you take that the earth is indeed hollow?

Just as a start gravity isn't fully explained, so all the calculations based on it's partial explanation will take our perception as a base which is something completely subjected to distortions and inference.

We could very well have a force just like gravity working in the opposite direction from the center to crust thus making everything settle in-between.

Newton's work is great and by no means I'm trying to discredit. But if his work was really complete (GOD like perfect) by now we would understand gravity to a extent that would allow us to reverse it. Something that isn't happening, meaning that something still missing.

So possibilities are still there.


reply posted on 7-3-2009 @ 06:21 AM by coredrill
reply to post by thomas_



It is not "my" calculation!
If you read my post, i had said that a poster had given the scientific explanation. and it is not me. i just pasted what is posted there, on the other forum.


reply posted on 11-3-2009 @ 02:30 AM by thomas_
reply to post by coredrill



I see but it doesn't matter if it's yours or not. The point is that those calculations are based on what we now, our current comprehension, perception and acceptance of the things around us.

So at best it argues that hollow earth couldn't exist within the current standards of sciences. Which means that it doesn't proves for A+B that it couldn't exist.

When Science starts to accept incomplete theories as final answers to questions progress is interrupted and Science stops being knowledge and starts being ignorance.

Still I do agree with you that a hollow earth idea could be indeed a bit far fetched.

But since I don't know for sure I'm open.



reply posted on 11-3-2009 @ 07:08 AM by coredrill
reply to post by thomas_



Thomas,

Gravity and density are proven.
Its impossible to disprove them.


reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 12:12 AM by Hanslune
reply to post by coredrill




Unless....you believe really really hard!

More seriously satellites in polar orbit cover all areas of the that area. This theory died (or should have) over a century ago.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 6 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 14 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 10 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 17 hours ago, 119 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 13 hours ago, 103 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 66 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 60 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies