It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

fake moon landing nice video

page: 1
4
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 11:32 AM
link   
video.google.com...


really interesting to watch and yes i know100% for sure now the moon landing walking on the moon was a fake


peace to you all and also this shows again how the government is lying over and over again about what it does, this includes the truth about ufos etc

this shows that that all is real




posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 11:48 AM
link   
"The flag was waving where there's no air"...sigh.

I'm all for tin foil hats once in a while, but we went to the moon.

This FOX show was discussed on badastronomy website:

www.badastronomy.com...

There was a similar thread here back in November



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 11:55 AM
link   
Absolute rubbish all this has been proven beyond all doubt we went to the moon, i will never understand why people have always got to destroy the dreams and achievments of others i doesnt take a primary school kid to understand.



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 12:00 PM
link   
It could have been faked.
This video shows some pretty good edvidence.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 12:10 PM
link   
Well, well ... and what do you think about this offical picture of TWO moon buggy's on the moon at the same time:

history.nasa.gov...




posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 12:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Terrapop
Well, well ... and what do you think about this offical picture of TWO moon buggy's on the moon at the same time:

history.nasa.gov...



Those mountains look fake to me, the clear line just looks off.
Still a nice shot i guess though.



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Well, I was not aware that we had two buggys on the moon at the same time... but anyway, it is on NASA's servers.

[edit on 6-12-2007 by Terrapop]



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 12:47 PM
link   
hm really? mm why where there photo anomalies, shadows from different directions, oh well i know enough everyone is free to think what they want but i have proof enough



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 01:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Terrapop
Well, I was not aware that we had two buggys on the moon at the same time... but anyway, it is on NASA's servers.

[edit on 6-12-2007 by Terrapop]


Oh, didnt catch that cause im sleepy, so there is only supossed to be one
buggy,that would be good edvidence



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 01:18 PM
link   
We may have went to moon... but it is possible that the Govt or Nasa cannot shre the original landing video... you know why...

so they produced the video in a lab... and than people found lot of flaws in it, one thing is for sure they found something there.

Maybe John Lear is right... anyways good post thanks for sharing



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 01:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Terrapop
 


It sucks to see no stars though on this one.

Perhaps photoshop will do the job?



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Terrapop
 


From the header page from which the image is taken from:


The following images show the fun side of being an Apollo enthusiast. Many of the offerings use Apollo images and scenes as a basis, but with unexpected additions. Other offerings show Apollo images and scenes have been altered or enhanced for artistic purposes. And still others show members of the ALSJ/AFJ team having Apollo-like adventures here on Planet Earth. Enjoy!


Source - Image link is "Fun Pix" on left column then "19 July 2007".

Considering the image is named "granprix.*" I would say that it is an interanlly altered image in jest. Unless you knew this and are enjoying a poke...



[edit on 6-12-2007 by Lost_Mind]



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 01:47 PM
link   
They make jokes to hide the obvious wouldn't you after all the people pointing out flaws?


I would put a funny in too just to keep the hipe up!



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 01:51 PM
link   
There's also this other one ...

www.hq.nasa.gov...
www.hq.nasa.gov...


[edit on 6/12/2007 by internos]



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 02:17 PM
link   
*sigh*

Ok ok let's humour this for a second, and only a second.

Is the Japanese Moon orbiter going to take snapshots of the Appollo gear left behind??

That will put an end to all this fake-moon non-sense.

Here are the official japanese sites for the Kayuga(Selene) mission.

www.jaxa.jp...

www.selene.jaxa.jp...

Btw I just found this on their site...:

"Is SELENE scheduled to observe the location of the Apollo landing sites and if the onboard cameras have the resolution to capture discernable images of the landing sites to find Apollo lunar rover, etc..

KAGUYA (SELENE) observes the entire lunar surface using mission instruments such as Terrain camera, multiband imager, etc. This means that KAGUYA provides images where Apollo were landed with 10 meter resolution of Terrain Camera. Since Apollo lander and rover were too small to detect with 10 meter resolution, it is difficult for us to provide discernable images of the landing sites of the Apollo.
"



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Terrapop
Well, well ... and what do you think about this offical picture of TWO moon buggy's on the moon at the same time:

history.nasa.gov...




simple search on google .. you know .. the search engine ... with the answers .. you know... google .. ?






The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an electric vehicle designed to operate in the low-gravity vacuum of the Moon and to be capable of traversing the lunar surface, allowing the Apollo astronauts to extend the range of their surface extravehicular activities. Three LRVs were driven on the Moon, one on Apollo 15 by astronauts David Scott and Jim Irwin, one on Apollo 16 by John Young and Charles Duke, and one on Apollo 17 by Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.


en.wikipedia.org...


so much for debunking ..



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 07:38 PM
link   
It's ridiculous that the same "evidence" keeps being used over and over again by those who don't think we went to the moon, when that evidence has been shown to be false. Apparently there is no learning going on. Not seeing stars is normal. Even space shuttle footage doesn't show stars. There's nothing wrong with the shadows on the moon. Shadows can look look like they converge and separate because of both perspective and uneven ground. There was a documentary that dealt with all the moon-hoax theories and showed them to be false.

Also pointed out on that documentary was that a mirror was placed on the Moon and we use that to bounce lasers off of to measure the distance of the moon. So yes, it's a fact, we've been to the moon, and more than once. You only make yourself look uneducated, paranoid and totally irrational when you keep denying we've landed on the moon.



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 07:40 PM
link   
Any documentary with the word "FOX" in the lower right hand corner is a FLAG for me. IMO, we went to the moon.



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 07:53 PM
link   


The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an electric vehicle designed to operate in the low-gravity vacuum of the Moon and to be capable of traversing the lunar surface, allowing the Apollo astronauts to extend the range of their surface extravehicular activities. Three LRVs were driven on the Moon, one on Apollo 15 by astronauts David Scott and Jim Irwin, one on Apollo 16 by John Young and Charles Duke, and one on Apollo 17 by Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.


This clearly states there were 3 on the moon by the time Apollo 17 was done, however it also states that only one was in use per mission for the 3 missions that had them... Making NASA's double photo impossible by this description.


I thought the NASA guy's explenation in the video was rather humorious... Basically saying since its impossible to address the vast number of issues, there's no point in specifically addressing any of them...

That and saying the theory we didn't go to the moon is without merit because its got so many parts. In reality if you give the theory the benefit of the doubt, it would have to be complex as it would mean every ounce of the moon missions was carefully manufactured... Could the theory somehow be more believable if there was only one tiny thing that was questionable???


Roswell is the textbook example today as to how that explination can't hold water on its own. Regardless of what you believe happened there, if you asked the government 10 years ago what was found in Roswell, they would have told you a weather balloon. If you then said to them that was a lie they would come back and tell you that to believe anything else is rediculus and any theory that it was anything but a weather balloon is without merit. Yet not all that long ago the government came forward and said "well, it wasn't really a weather balloon it was a Mogul balloon system". Faintly symiler but still a whole heck of a lot more complex than just a plain weather balloon. So guess what this means? Regardless as to weather you buy the current Mogul theory or not, it means without any question that the weather balloon theory was a LIE, and that anybody who claimed a theory that it was anything but a weather balloon was without merit was LYING!!!

In essence 10 years ago it would have been easy for NASA to say "any theory saying we didn't go to the moon is about as rediculus as any theory saying what happened in Roswell was anything but a weather balloon." And of course if someone had actually said something like that, it would mean they would have to be fairly red faced right now at the very least...


But what I'm getting at is basically this: Either address the facts individually or say you have no argument. Don't sit there and say "well, I can't really address some of these things so I'm going to spout a bland general argument and then pretend as if I've already won"...



posted on Dec, 6 2007 @ 08:40 PM
link   
At 4:18 No Stars :

"The stars were missing from the black lunar skies"

Obviously you can't see any stars at this perspective due to the contrast. Everything is so bright. This is the day side of the moon where the sun is shining brightly. You'll only see stars when you are on the night side. Try shining a flashlight towards your eyes in a dark room. Can you see anything? Barely!!

At 12:37 regarding the rocket engine noise :

"The noise level of a rocket engine is up in the 140-150 decibel range. In other words, enormously loud. How would it be possible to hear astronauts voices against the background of a running rocket engine?"

Sound can travel through any medium, but it cannot travel through a vacuum. There is no sound in outer space. You can't hear any rocket sounds in the moon because of absence of air or a medium. If it were so, then we would be deaf already due to the enormous explosion of the sun.

I'll check all the misinformation on this moon conspiracy videos and I'll add more later.





new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join