fake moon landing nice video, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 6-12-2007 @ 11:32 AM by newworldnews2007
video.google.com...


really interesting to watch and yes i know100% for sure now the moon landing walking on the moon was a fake


peace to you all and also this shows again how the government is lying over and over again about what it does, this includes the truth about ufos etc

this shows that that all is real


reply posted on 6-12-2007 @ 01:27 PM by TheoOne
reply to post by Terrapop



It sucks to see no stars though on this one.

Perhaps photoshop will do the job?


reply posted on 6-12-2007 @ 01:43 PM by Lost_Mind
reply to post by Terrapop



From the header page from which the image is taken from:

The following images show the fun side of being an Apollo enthusiast. Many of the offerings use Apollo images and scenes as a basis, but with unexpected additions. Other offerings show Apollo images and scenes have been altered or enhanced for artistic purposes. And still others show members of the ALSJ/AFJ team having Apollo-like adventures here on Planet Earth. Enjoy!


Source - Image link is "Fun Pix" on left column then "19 July 2007".

Considering the image is named "granprix.*" I would say that it is an interanlly altered image in jest. Unless you knew this and are enjoying a poke...



[edit on 6-12-2007 by Lost_Mind]


reply posted on 6-12-2007 @ 02:17 PM by senshido
*sigh*

Ok ok let's humour this for a second, and only a second.

Is the Japanese Moon orbiter going to take snapshots of the Appollo gear left behind??

That will put an end to all this fake-moon non-sense.

Here are the official japanese sites for the Kayuga(Selene) mission.

www.jaxa.jp...

www.selene.jaxa.jp...

Btw I just found this on their site...:

"Is SELENE scheduled to observe the location of the Apollo landing sites and if the onboard cameras have the resolution to capture discernable images of the landing sites to find Apollo lunar rover, etc..

KAGUYA (SELENE) observes the entire lunar surface using mission instruments such as Terrain camera, multiband imager, etc. This means that KAGUYA provides images where Apollo were landed with 10 meter resolution of Terrain Camera. Since Apollo lander and rover were too small to detect with 10 meter resolution, it is difficult for us to provide discernable images of the landing sites of the Apollo.
"



reply posted on 6-12-2007 @ 02:38 PM by tep200377
Originally posted by Terrapop
Well, well ... and what do you think about this offical picture of TWO moon buggy's on the moon at the same time:

history.nasa.gov...




simple search on google .. you know .. the search engine ... with the answers .. you know... google .. ?





The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an electric vehicle designed to operate in the low-gravity vacuum of the Moon and to be capable of traversing the lunar surface, allowing the Apollo astronauts to extend the range of their surface extravehicular activities. Three LRVs were driven on the Moon, one on Apollo 15 by astronauts David Scott and Jim Irwin, one on Apollo 16 by John Young and Charles Duke, and one on Apollo 17 by Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.


en.wikipedia.org...


so much for debunking ..


reply posted on 6-12-2007 @ 07:53 PM by bobbyt

The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an electric vehicle designed to operate in the low-gravity vacuum of the Moon and to be capable of traversing the lunar surface, allowing the Apollo astronauts to extend the range of their surface extravehicular activities. Three LRVs were driven on the Moon, one on Apollo 15 by astronauts David Scott and Jim Irwin, one on Apollo 16 by John Young and Charles Duke, and one on Apollo 17 by Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.


This clearly states there were 3 on the moon by the time Apollo 17 was done, however it also states that only one was in use per mission for the 3 missions that had them... Making NASA's double photo impossible by this description.


I thought the NASA guy's explenation in the video was rather humorious... Basically saying since its impossible to address the vast number of issues, there's no point in specifically addressing any of them...

That and saying the theory we didn't go to the moon is without merit because its got so many parts. In reality if you give the theory the benefit of the doubt, it would have to be complex as it would mean every ounce of the moon missions was carefully manufactured... Could the theory somehow be more believable if there was only one tiny thing that was questionable???


Roswell is the textbook example today as to how that explination can't hold water on its own. Regardless of what you believe happened there, if you asked the government 10 years ago what was found in Roswell, they would have told you a weather balloon. If you then said to them that was a lie they would come back and tell you that to believe anything else is rediculus and any theory that it was anything but a weather balloon is without merit. Yet not all that long ago the government came forward and said "well, it wasn't really a weather balloon it was a Mogul balloon system". Faintly symiler but still a whole heck of a lot more complex than just a plain weather balloon. So guess what this means? Regardless as to weather you buy the current Mogul theory or not, it means without any question that the weather balloon theory was a LIE, and that anybody who claimed a theory that it was anything but a weather balloon was without merit was LYING!!!

In essence 10 years ago it would have been easy for NASA to say "any theory saying we didn't go to the moon is about as rediculus as any theory saying what happened in Roswell was anything but a weather balloon." And of course if someone had actually said something like that, it would mean they would have to be fairly red faced right now at the very least...


But what I'm getting at is basically this: Either address the facts individually or say you have no argument. Don't sit there and say "well, I can't really address some of these things so I'm going to spout a bland general argument and then pretend as if I've already won"...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 22 member flags
UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags