The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an electric vehicle designed to operate in the low-gravity vacuum of the Moon and to be capable of traversing the
lunar surface, allowing the Apollo astronauts to extend the range of their surface extravehicular activities. Three LRVs were driven on the
Moon, one on Apollo 15 by astronauts David Scott and Jim Irwin, one on Apollo 16 by John Young and Charles Duke, and one on Apollo 17 by Gene
Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.
This clearly states there were 3 on the moon by the time Apollo 17 was done, however it also states that only one was in use per mission for the 3
missions that had them... Making NASA's double photo impossible by this description.
I thought the NASA guy's explenation in the video was rather humorious... Basically saying since its impossible to address the vast number of
issues, there's no point in specifically addressing any of them...
That and saying the theory we didn't go to the moon is without merit because its got so many parts. In reality if you give the theory the benefit of
the doubt, it would have to be complex as it would mean every ounce of the moon missions was carefully manufactured... Could the theory somehow be
more believable if there was only one tiny thing that was questionable???
Roswell is the textbook example today as to how that explination can't hold water on its own. Regardless of what you believe happened there, if you
asked the government 10 years ago what was found in Roswell, they would have told you a weather balloon. If you then said to them that was a lie they
would come back and tell you that to believe anything else is rediculus and any theory that it was anything but a weather balloon is without merit.
Yet not all that long ago the government came forward and said "well, it wasn't really a weather balloon it was a Mogul balloon system". Faintly
symiler but still a whole heck of a lot more complex than just a plain weather balloon. So guess what this means? Regardless as to weather you buy
the current Mogul theory or not, it means without any question that the weather balloon theory was a LIE, and that anybody who claimed a theory that
it was anything but a weather balloon was without merit was LYING!!!
In essence 10 years ago it would have been easy for NASA to say "any theory saying we didn't go to the moon is about as rediculus as any theory
saying what happened in Roswell was anything but a weather balloon." And of course if someone had actually said something like that, it would mean
they would have to be fairly red faced right now at the very least...
But what I'm getting at is basically this: Either address the facts individually or say you have no argument. Don't sit there and say "well, I
can't really address some of these things so I'm going to spout a bland general argument and then pretend as if I've already won"...