It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
‘Every action has an equal and opposite reaction’, in other words when two objects collide the resultant force is equal to both objects, the weaker object will lose regardless of which one was moving. This shows why the plane crashes severed columns hypothesis-is is very questionable. Aluminum is not going to sever steel columns. Think about it…
Originally posted by albieThat's a simplfied way of seeing it. Ever hear of a straw being rammed into a tree by a tornado?
Intense winds can bend a tree or other objects, creating cracks in which which debris (e.g., hay straw) becomes lodged before the tree straightens vellingand the crack tightens shut again. All bizarre damage effects have a physical cause inside the roiling maelstrom of tornado winds. We don't fully understand what some of those causes are yet, however; because much of it is almost impossible to simulate in a lab.
Originally posted by albie
The plane is not a paper plane. It is built for strength and lightness.
Originally posted by ANOK
^There's no doubting there would be penetration.
Originally posted by Damocles
reply to post by Insolubrious
but i have to ask old friend, how much research have you done into explosives and what they can/cant do in order to support your facts?
i mean im willing to agree to disagree but it just seems that if youre going to accept something as fact it might help to have done equal amount of research into the topic
if you want any suggestions for reference materials ill be glad to u2u some to you, though ive never looked to see if they are available online as i have hardcopies here at home.
A tornado is a violently rotating column of air which descends from a thunderstorm to the ground. No other weather phenomenon can match the fury and destructive power of tornadoes. Tornadoes can be strong enough to destroy large buildings, leaving only the bare concrete foundation. In addition, they can lift 20-ton railroad cars from their tracks and they can drive straw and blades of grass into tree and telephone poles.
thanx for the answer James, but a straw is weaker than a pencil and a tree is stronger than a 1/2" of ply. What was the velocity of the pencil? I guess the question is...is it possible for a wheat straw to penetrate say a 10" tree trunk going 300 miles per hour? when you say "fast enough" that goes without saying right? I mean at 17,000mph it would go through a chunk of steel. lets say 300mph for an F5 tornado max speed. thank you again for your reply James.
Propelling a piece of straw at a palm tree at a distance of 50cm at 320mph (the world record for recorded wind speed at ground level), the straw only managed to penetrate the tree a quarter of an inch. Even firing at the tree while it was bent (to increase the size of the pores in the surface of the tree) at point blank range added no additional distance into the tree. A piece of reed was tested as the sturdiest organic object that might be mistaken for a piece of straw. At both ranges, the reed only managed to go about two inches into the tree. Additionally, Jamie tried a piece of piano wire, and at 50 cm, it flew not only through the tree but through a sheet of plywood on the wall behind it, partially embedding itself into the cement wall.
Originally posted by albie
Also, the planes weren't all aluminium. Consider the engines and any other steel parts.
With only a few seconds warning, Hinsdale just above the could not evade the kamikaze; at 0600 the suicide plane crashed into her port side water line and ripped into the engine room. Three explosions rocked the troop-laden transport as the kamikaze's bombs exploded deep inside her and tore the engine room apart— only one member of the watch survived death by scalding steam from the exploding boilers.
Originally posted by Damocles
reply to post by Insolubrious
heh well if he's bored, send him the lnk to that debate thread i u2u'd you the lnk for. id love for you to get his thoughts on it and compare notes with me. (feel free to use the "yahoo" button under any of my posts)
your friend may be a conspiracy buff. but, id be interested in his thoughts about my thesis' on the cd theories. (of course though i would like him to back up any critical comments with more than "cuz i said so" lol)
[ /off topic rambling ]