It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Conspiriology
my personal example: true, i want a world without religion... but i want a world that is VOLUNTARILY without religion. one where people are atheists who have come to the decision themselves.
Yes how transparent is this.
Here let me translate for mad to better illustrate just how that sounds.
What a wonderful world this could be,, if only everyone were a little more
like me.
BTW, Hitler wanted a world without religion, so did stalin. Two men, atheists that had killed millions and millions in genocidal slaughter. Then went on to start WWll the holocaust, and the mass killing of hundreds of thousands of Jehova wittnesses. It is people like yourself but want a world without religion that are to blame for much of the atrocities of evil.
The only difference is you want them to comply voluntarily (gee how kind of you pffft) while the others just wanted them dead.
Since they were not religious tyrants, I guess it doesn't count.
You want to dispell stereotypes about atheists while making broad generalizations regarding religion. Religions are so many so differen't how you can just lump them all into a blame for so many social ills and have us believe you knew SQUAT about them is yet another transparent issue.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
But the disparity between the number of atheists on the outside and the percentage of atheists in the prison population is quite telling about who has better ethics
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
One thing that stumps me about the christian religion is that if you dont go to church you're apparently going to hell.
Originally posted by cavscout
One thing to consider would be the possibility that a large portion of those Christian inmates were converted IN the prison system. If true, that would turn your argument about who has the better ethics right back around on you.
I have never been locked up, but many of my friends have. I am going to ask them about this.
TextI was speaking with a friends son the other day. He is 8 years old and is fascinated by dinosaurs. I told him that some people think the didn't go extinct but rather evolved into the birds you see everyday.
His mother in a very angry and contemptuous voice told me that they don't believe in evolution and not to talk to her son about it.
Text She states he learns "gods truth about creation". The kid is home schooled and drilled with Christian dogma.
Stalin was for lust of power and not in the name of atheism
He refers to Christianity as "the first spiritual terror," as a model for the Nazis in their pursuit of power, while simultaneously lamenting the demise of what he calls "the far freer ancient world" before Christianity. [17]
Religious neutrality
In the beginning Hitler was opposed to state atheism, which for example was part of the political system of the Soviet Union, but he nevertheless desired a religiously neutral state system, at least during the years of his dictatorship.[37] He feared the political power that the churches had, and did not want to openly antagonize that political base until he had securely gained control of the country.
Once in power however Hitler showed his contempt for religious leaders who were in a position to undermine his rule.[38] [39] Within Hitler's Nazi Party some atheists were quite vocal especially Baldur von Schirach, Arthur Axmann and Martin Bormann. From Hitler's promotion of declared atheists within his party. it can be concluded that Hitler in the public realm tolerated different religious opinions, ranging from atheist to Islam to Christianity, as long as those people professing these different creeds would support the Nazi regime. Hitler often used religious speech and symbolism in his propaganda to appease and promote Nazism to those that he feared would be disposed to act against him]
hitler had "god is with us" (in german of course) emblazoned on nazi belt buckles..
hitler was NOT an atheist.
no, i don't want them to comply, i want them to come to things on their own.
Let me be clear on this before I go Cambodian on just how this double standard you use to relinquish this "day in the park" era of history assuming atheism is NOT a religion has no GOD no Jihad no Reason to use a non belief in something for doing anything in the name of a religion it does not profess to agree with. That being said, again I fail to see how whether or not they were motivated by power, lust or greed has any more relevance using your own rationale to disqualify the distinction that their are wars and mass killings that have been brought about by atheists.
since neither of them did it in the name of atheism (and one was a theist) it doesn't count.
You want to dispell stereotypes about atheists while making broad generalizations regarding religion. Religions are so many so differen't how you can just lump them all into a blame for so many social ills and have us believe you knew SQUAT about them is yet another transparent issue.
If christianity is so great why then does it resort to scare tactics such as this.
Originally posted by ConspiriologyYou have created excuses for atheist who are evil saying it didn't count for it was not done in the name of atheism.
ANY EVIL DONE IS DONE IN THE NAME OF GODLESSNESS
AND ANY GOD THAT ASKS ANY ONE TO KILL MILLIONS OF JEWS AS HITLER DID IS NO CHRISTIAN, I DON'T CARE IF IT WAS TATTOOED ON HIS FOREHEAD.
nobeliefs.com...
It is the antithesis of the Christian God and any Christian with an IOTA of education knows that.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
reply to post by cavscout
I see your point there, but its not a myth for me, its something that was said to me personally by a christian. Not to say that all christians are like that
but its not a myth for me, its something that was said to me personally by a christian.
Being 'godless' does not make us 'evil'.
..so I'm wondering.. based on your 'reasoning'.. were the inquisitions and crusades also led by atheists?
Originally posted by Conspiriology
ANY EVIL DONE IS DONE IN THE NAME OF GODLESSNESS
Being 'godless' does not make us 'evil'.
No more then being an atheist makes you right or righteous.
I guess then you think Jesus Christs teaching s are a crock and he was a liar. Ok I am insulted once more. So much for dispelling myths
LOOK GUY,, IF HITLER BELIEVED IN GOD THEN HIS RELIGION IS HATE AND HE WAS HIS RELIGIONS ANSWER TO SATAN.
You can not tell me anyone with no understanding of people who believe in a GOD or the Concept of one could be so unsympathetic GIVE IT UP IT YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS .
IF HE BELIEVED IN A CHRISTIAN GOD Conventional wisdom would follow he would have PROTECTED THE JEWS NOT SYSTEMATICALLY ELIMINATED AS MANY AS HE COULD IN DEATH CAMPS!
How that makes no sense to you I can not understand but is enough for me to realize you are obviously not of a level of understanding even basic concepts and ideas.
I would also suggest (if I were madismysoul) that you refrain from making your case about myths even harder to defend. Or just shut up.
By the way that Bull about Hitler believing in a GOD proven by the fact that he painted a picture? I guess we all better watch what we paint or as a man painteth ,, so is he.
We also know that all christians are entitled to forgiveness.. and all thats needed to be 'saved' is a belief in god and repentence.. correct? who are you to judge hitler as not a christian?
Originally posted by Conspiriology
We also know that all christians are entitled to forgiveness.. and all thats needed to be 'saved' is a belief in god and repentence.. correct? who are you to judge hitler as not a christian?
Do you have any idea how idiotic that statement is?
Any at all?
I not only judge Hitler as not being a Christian all the way to his subsequect suicide but REBUKE HIM AND HIS ACTIONS. IF GOD forgives him that doesn't mean I do.
Don't give me any "forms" of Chritianity guy because their isn't any.
Their may be forms of religion and he killed millions of Jews Religiously however by his own MOUTH HE DISPISED CHRISTIANITY.
What he did for political reasons substantiates only that he was a manipulative liar and a church sanctioning him under false pretense is a church whose sanctions were a breach of contract
I'm putting you on ignore your posts contribute nothing to the threads purpose and only exascerbate it's reasons they exist.