It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Great Pyramid could have been a Plutonium Mill

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 9 2007 @ 12:58 AM
reply to post by earth2

This is a total inane load of bung.

Plutonium does not occur naturally on Earth. It cannot be mined.

Uranium can be mined, and if you work very hard (as Enrico Fermi did) you can create a nuclear reactor using natural unenriched uranium, but you need precise control of geometry, and most importantly extremely pure graphite.

Almost all graphite you usually mine has slight impurities which causes major nuclear problems. The Germans in WW2 didn't figure it out, and gave up, but the US had vacuumed up the European Jews like Fermi and many others, and they did figure it out.

Then once you get a nuclear reactor you run it for a few years and then you take the pieces, dissolve them in nitric acid and very dirtily separate out the plutonium. All the while this liquid gunk is radioactive as bejeezus and will give a fatal dose to people over a few hours.

The size of the industrial plant and technology necessary to do this is way way bigger than the pyramids.

And besides, there would be lots of radioactive contamination still left over. There isn't .

Machining plutonium (only useful for nuclear weapons and reactors) takes powered, high precision expensive modern technology.

Egyptians had stone and slaves, not high speed tungsten drill bits.

The ancient world knew nothing sensible about chemistry whatsoever---really only starting in 1800's did humans have a clue.

And why would they do it in a middle of a pyramid?

And for what? What would they do with a nuclear reactor? It would just poison them and their livestock (and they'd have no idea why).

ATS is really going down the tubes, in my opinion.

posted on Dec, 9 2007 @ 06:52 PM
"Why would aliens bury boats around their nuclear processing plant?"


posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 10:13 AM
Saying that the pyramids are primitive because they were made
With stone is the most idiotic statement I've ever read

Not only is it ENVIROMENTALLY SOUND something we have yet to
Grasp and only now becoming away of , but it also last far longer
Then anything we build today , as for the lascivious of radiation in the pyramid
And the need for graphite

This is not true as far as I know all modern nuclear reactors use graphite , but again

Water can be used just as easily and in a flowing manner can be used to continuously
Flush out the chamber , if water was constantly flowing and surrounding
The nuclear reaction , it's very plausible that no signs could be detected
By radioactive counters

As for the smaller pyramids I've read the theory and agree with
It is there as a marker for the old equator

Don't forget at some point the pyramid was under sea level hence all the limestone
The bible speaks of the sea parting which could be a sign of a tsunami which
Would explain what happened to the Egyptians and could cause a water based nuclear reactor to fail

This is assuming the reactor was still active at this time

But looking at the bible I think there are clues it was
Moses had more powerful magic then the pharaoh

Ok what magic did the pharaoh actually posses?
If they had some kind of power source any kind of technology would be seen as magic

posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 10:15 AM

Originally posted by etombo
"Why would aliens bury boats around their nuclear processing plant?"


Again tsunami theory

posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 10:21 AM
And one more thing big piles of rock built as an eight sided
Pyramid which is much harder then four

With the circumference of the earth pi and the golden ratio all incorporated
Into its structure

I don't care who u are you either have to be sense or compromised
To entertain this structure is not more advanced then today's

top topics
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in