It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by robwerden
A black hole is really the only way to destroy matter. Since matter theoretically can not be destroyed it needs to go to a point where it can no longer be matter and is returned to pure energy.
Originally posted by robwerden
The universe only fuses atoms in nature, it can not split them. A black hole is the only way to destroy an atom on a constant on going process that does not need to be reset like a nuke does.
Originally posted by timelike
reply to post by robwerden
I work with black holes, they're my research area. However, I'm not sure I understand your question in assuming everything has a point. What's the point of birds you might ask? Well there isn't one!
A supermassive black hole is a black hole with a mass in the range of hundreds of thousands to tens of billions of solar masses. It is currently thought that most, if not all galaxies, including the Milky Way, contain a supermassive black hole at their galactic center.
Originally posted by TheOracle
I don't understand how people say that Time somehow stops when talking about black holes. What do you exactly mean? That the chain of events stops and everything stands still? In my mind Time (past present future) is a block that already exists but we cannot perceive.
Originally posted by squiz
Black holes are theoretical, other models offer a more believable theory and similar effects can be replicated in the lab. Sorry to be negative to the OP, but black holes deserve the same skepticism that other taboo subjects here on ATS attract and yet many accept it at face value without any evidence.