The human collective conscience., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 30-11-2007 @ 07:20 PM by HuntaXX
Originally posted by banyan
I agree with other posters on here in saying that you cannot totally credit the concept of global consciousness to people wanting food or coming in at the same time.
Waking Life, touches on global consciousness a little. Check it out.

I agree. but i like to look at the logical explanations first and i still think when it comes to food some degree of it has to do with other factors


reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 12:39 AM by cpdaman
Originally posted by dionysius9


I think the world is on a threshold. Each human acts like an individual brain cell - a component of a larger mind. A billion more people and the collective IQ of humanity will reach the point that we as a whole will realize that there is nothing to be gained from warfare that you don't lose many times over compared to working together.





well if there was any validity to this, you would think those that profit from war would be threatened by rising populations would u not?

And like any succesful group and or "business" trying to protect their profits they would come out with a strong strategic plan to counter these threats and in ways that would make these counter strategy's hidden from public view or somehow turn them around as helpless tradgedy's (Aids, other diseases, etc ?)

I mean i would venture to guess some business/groups (If there "lives" depended) on it would somehow rationalize it to themselves that the ends (deaths of third worlder's and those that are not the "fittest" justify the means (which is their leadership ....in overseeing the general population to ensure some structure and stability to society (which in their warped logic is worth more lives i.e their leadership saves more lives, than the collateral effects of which kill

combine this with a beleif that 95 percent need to be told what to believe (by the 5%) this would give them the rationale to stretch and bend the truth, (reported thru various media) wether they believe you couldn't handle it, and/ or in order to keep a self perpetuating system going strong.

just brainstorming aloud

[edit on 1-12-2007 by cpdaman]


reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 07:04 AM by LDragonFire
Originally posted by cpdaman

well if there was any validity to this, you would think those that profit from war would be threatened by rising populations would u not?


I think this was recognized possibly thousands of years ago, and the birth of the different religions where born, to keep the indivIdual MInd closed of, thuS Separating vast nUmbers of people from the collective mind.

And like any succesful group and or "business" trying to protect their profits they would come out with a strong strategic plan to counter these threats and in ways that would make these counter strategy's hidden from public view or somehow turn them around as helpless tradgedy's (Aids, other diseases, etc ?)


I also think that the separations of race also play a role in keeping us separated. Just look at the divisions between humans based of both religion and race. No matter what color we are or what language we speak we are all human, until you add race and religious doctrine, then one group sees the other groups as sub-human

I mean i would venture to guess some business/groups (If there "lives" depended) on it would somehow rationalize it to themselves that the ends (deaths of third worlder's and those that are not the "fittest" justify the means (which is their leadership ....in overseeing the general population to ensure some structure and stability to society (which in their warped logic is worth more lives i.e their leadership saves more lives, than the collateral effects of which kill

combine this with a beleif that 95 percent need to be told what to believe (by the 5%) this would give them the rationale to stretch and bend the truth, (reported thru various media) wether they believe you couldn't handle it, and/ or in order to keep a self perpetuating system going strong.


What are some things that could bring humanity closer? To view each human as a brother or sister, to view without hate or mistrust? How can we cease to be a American, or British, or Russian, or Muslim, and to just be a Earthling?

We are all taught who is good or bad, by a society that feeds off of our fears. Governments throughout history have dehumanized one nation or group of people to further there political or to justify power grabs through wars, and the religions have taught us that people of different faiths are heathens, and somehow less than human. Many religions go as far as stating that a open mind leaves it wide open from attacks or possessions by demons.

just brainstorming aloud


Yeah me 2

Just what would it take for us to open ourselves to this possibility, and if we do, what are the limits we could achieve? or would their even be any limits?


reply posted on 1-12-2007 @ 02:45 PM by shanti23
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Humans seem to be connected on some unknown level. I’m not sure what to call it and I’m not sure if science has a name for it. But all of humanity seems to be wired together.


Interesting thread!

The
Hundredth Monkey Effect pertains to this possibility. Essentially a critical mass is achieved and the idea propagates throughout the species.

Inventions follow a similar pattern. Television and radio, for example, were being 'discovered' around the same time by different people in different parts of the world.

Emotions are transferable. A smile is contagious, as is the anger passed on by someone elbowing you out of their way in the street.

Some people get on like wildfire from the get-go and others hate each other before a word is spoken.

The air we breath and the water we drink predates the human race.

Everything in this reality is 'connected'.


And the greatest good you can do is to bring back a new idea, because our world is endangered by the absence of good ideas. Our world is in crisis because of the absence of consciousness.

Terence McKenna



reply posted on 2-12-2007 @ 09:53 AM by MikeboydUS
Here's my take from the reserach I've done.

One:

Our Consciousness involves Quantum Entanglement in our minds. Sir Roger Penrose has been one of the biggest supporters of this idea.
Sir Roger Penrose is an English mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford. So he's not some quack. Essentially the human mind is a Quantum Computer.

Article on the mind and quantum computation
www.quantumconsciousness.org...

Two:

Entanglement can and does occur across space. It is a type of "Spooky action at a distance" and is used in Quantum Teleportation and will be used in Quantum computing.

Spooky action and beyond
www.signandsight.com...

Essentially what appears to be happening is our minds or consciousnesses are linked by what is known as Quantum Channels that transmit Quantum Information. These are not quack ideas but actually the foundation of Quantum Information Theory which again involves Quantum Teleportation and Computing.

Site about Quantum Information Theory and Computing
cam.qubit.org...

Three:

When a person begins to look at these objectively and with research conducted by Dean Radin, Princeton Engineering Anomalous Research and the US Military at Fort Belvoir, a new paradigm emerges.

One that implies that all Human Consciousness is connected by a network that is the same as Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious and the abode of Joseph Campbell's Archetypes.

Even more bizarre is that we seem to have the ability to perform Anomalous Operations and Cognition at a distance by using this network. It is possibly not even limited by Time, Space, or this Universe/Reality. Even more disturbing is the implications of the existance of Anomalous Entities that also use or live in this network. In other words we are not alone.









[edit on 2/12/07 by MikeboydUS]


reply posted on 2-12-2007 @ 04:19 PM by GeeGee
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
Here's my take from the reserach I've done.

One:

Our Consciousness involves Quantum Entanglement in our minds. Sir Roger Penrose has been one of the biggest supporters of this idea.
Sir Roger Penrose is an English mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford. So he's not some quack. Essentially the human mind is a Quantum Computer.

Article on the mind and quantum computation
www.quantumconsciousness.org...


Intersting. However, is that link not working for anyone else? I clicked it and it froze my browser.

Anyway, Michio Kaku is another great physicist who believes we're all connected. Problem with this theory is it is very controversial, it will take a very long time for it to become mainstream friendly. Most scientists right now believe consciousness is created in the brain, but as Dean Radin quotes Alan Wallace here:

youtube.com...

"Despite centuries of modern philosophical and scientific research into the nature of mind, at present there is no technology that can detect the presence or absence of any kind of consciousness. Strictly speaking, at present there is no scientific evidence even for the existence of consciousness. All the direct evidence we have consists of non-scientific, first person accounts of being conscious."

With that said, I think we should keep an open mind as to what consciousness really is.


[edit on 2-12-2007 by GeeGee]

[edit on 2-12-2007 by GeeGee]

[edit on 2-12-2007 by GeeGee]


reply posted on 2-12-2007 @ 10:29 PM by MikeboydUS
Originally posted by GeeGee

Intersting. However, is that link not working for anyone else? I clicked it and it froze my browser.

Anyway, Michio Kaku is another great physicist who believes we're all connected. Problem with this theory is it is very controversial, it will take a very long time for it to become mainstream friendly. Most scientists right now believe consciousness is created in the brain, but as Dean Radin quotes Alan Wallace here:

youtube.com...

"Despite centuries of modern philosophical and scientific research into the nature of mind, at present there is no technology that can detect the presence or absence of any kind of consciousness. Strictly speaking, at present there is no scientific evidence even for the existence of consciousness. All the direct evidence we have consists of non-scientific, first person accounts of being conscious."

With that said, I think we should keep an open mind as to what consciousness really is.


Do you have Adobe reader? Its a PDF article.

Michio Kaku is another of my favorite authors.

Thats true many phenomena involving the mind or consciousness can't really be verified or denied. How about dreams, nightmares, ideas, inspiration, thought, intuition, deja vu, and empathy? Science is completely dependent on the subject for information. We can speculate and ponder why and how with potential factors, but we have no concrete evidence to prove dreams even happen.


reply posted on 3-12-2007 @ 02:43 AM by MikeboydUS
reply to post by GeeGee




My first book by Michio Kaku was Hyperspace. I would recommend Parallel Worlds though. Its from 2006 and covers some quite interesting theories including the good possiblity that multiple universes exist parallel to our own.


[edit on 3/12/07 by MikeboydUS]


reply posted on 3-12-2007 @ 06:41 PM by The time lord
www.pitts.emory.edu...

It's very Biblical because Jesus was and is like a quantum being because he met him self in heaven aswell and basically can be anywhere at the same time so Biblically it sounds correct.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Only read this if you are quite young?
  Posted 9 days ago with 71 member flags
The World Is Waiting On You To Liberate Yourself From Ego!
  Posted 5 days ago with 36 member flags
Crazy Sufi Wisdom: The Moon Is More Valuable Than The Sun
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
The Messages of Animals
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
PEACE To attempt the impossible...
  Posted 4 days ago with 23 member flags
Something I Learned from Looking at my dog in the eye.
  Posted 16 days ago with 17 member flags
Experiment: What would YOU do?
  Posted 15 days ago with 12 member flags
A cry for help....anyone out there?
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags