COUREDNES
reply to post by MegaCurious
Thanks so much MegaCurious for this info!!
However, I must make a clear difference in what most are speaking of...
... The "tazaring"...
Yes... tazers are WEAPONS.... and should be used as such... they are anything but a "cool" electric device that innocently makes people loose the
"natural" functions of their bodies!!
From my perspective, as a security guard on the subways of Stockholm, Sweden for about 8 months before leaving the country, is that, though I was
trained for use with expanding baton and handcuffs and self defense/tackling, you always run a great risk of personal physical injury in an aggressive
conflict..
I am also a Natural Therapist. I have studied conflict resolution from many perspectives. I believe in the innate "good" within each of us. And I am
willing to risk my life to protect the innocent and weak(especially children).
I am nobodies fool and say exactly what I feel is the truth to anybody..
And from this perspective the only "REALLY IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM THIS INCEDENT" is "THE COMPLETE LACK OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS AND THE GREAT
COWARDICE" by these so called "PROTECTORS of THE PEACE".
I have dealt with so many drunk and violent people on the subway... And have ALWAYS been able to "humbly" "work" with these people without ever
having even one time the need to "wrestle" somebody to the ground..
I remind you that I am an ex-elite skier who has skied in extreme situations around Europe and the states and am an active climber of long and short
routes at a level of about 10a on-sight and trained martial arts with an ex Korean bodyguard for a Korean president..
Why do I say this?
Because if I wanted to I beat the "socks" off a lot of really tough characters.. I could have...
But who am I trying to "serve" when I aggressively "Separate" a young woman from her 1 year old child, than immediately, without a moment to
reevaluate the situation, using great force throw the woman to ground, without controlling her fall, as you can and are trained to do to minimize risk
of injury (face first maneuvers are the "last resort" tactics because it so easy to hit the face and head but also if this had been a man only
slightly stronger this "brave" officer would NEVER have gotten him to the ground with such a clumsy move.. And his execution was completely
incorrect because you can see the woman even if on the ground is not well contained and he needs to use EVEN MORE FORCE to "really" gain control..
;o( a simple move while she was still standing from behind would have completely immobilized her and than WHILE STILL STANDING could have
"negotiated" with this poor woman who probably was already petrified by this incompetent human being and was why she wanted to leave in the first
place!!)
What about a quick call to the "Social Service" and simple HUMAN COMPASION AND GOOD OL' FASHIONED EMPATHY...
A quick review of the situation;
A mother makes the effort to get to to a police station, raises her courage to than ACTUALLY GO INSIDE and than ask them to "take her child from
her". She than apparently changes her mind!! (Is that not her right??) At which timw this (i just cant use the name "officer" as this man does not
deserve it) GUY makes a psychological evaluation (which I would hardly believe he was educated to make) and WITHOUT ANY PHYSICAL AGRESSION (from the
part of the mother as she was holding her 1 year old child) ATTACKS THIS WOMAN AND HER CHILD (as he ripped the child from his mothers arms) and than
"attacks" her as if she was carrying an armed weapon and had threatened to use it!!!
Just beyond any comprehension of any MAN who has any sort of respect for themself..
Do you think he has a little penis!!??!! No really sorry... THIS GUY SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM DUTY PLACED INTO PSYCHOTHERAPY AND THAN PUT TO WORK
DIGGING HOLES BY HAND.