|
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:15 PM by brotherkc
|
Hi this is my first post on this forum. I read Weinland's book and I did a search on him and found this forum. Alot of what he says is true, but
not all of it, and he is a false prophet. False prophets will be able to do miracles and fool people according to the bible.
Revelation chapter 13 describes two beasts–the first rising out of the sea (13:1) and the second coming out of the earth (13:11). I must warn you:
This topic is shocking, controversial, and sure to stir up heated discussion. Nevertheless it must be presented faithfully, fairly, and without
compromise. John wrote:
“I saw a beast rising up out of the sea” (Revelation 13:1).
Who is this beast that figures so largely in God’s last book? Those who accept a “Preterist” interpretation of Revelation generally believe the
beast was the Roman emperor Nero who murdered Christians and Jews in the first century AD. Hank Hanegraaff and Sigmund Brouwer have recently expressed
this view in Tyndale’s new prophetic novel, The Last Disciple. Gary DeMar, John Noe, Ken Gentry Jr., Samuel Frost, Kurt Simmons, and many others
teach this idea. To Preterists, the beast is dead.
While Preterism is growing in strength, by far the most popular interpretation remains the “Futurist” one reflected in the bestselling Left Behind
series (also published by Tyndale). According to Futurists, the beast is still on the horizon–a monster that will only lurch into action after the
Rapture. Leading proponents of Futurism today are Tim LaHaye, Tommy Ice, Jack Van Impe, John Hagee, Chuck Smith, Hal Lindsey, and Irving Baxter Jr.
Both Preterists and Futurists see the beast as one satanic individual; an evil person. The biggest difference is the timing of when Mr. Diabolical
shows up.
So which is it? Is the beast past or future? Or could he be present? Hold onto your seats. This may surprise you, but from the time of the Reformation
until the late 1800s the vast majority of Protestant scholars firmly believed the beast was snarling right in front of them. Such was the doctrine of
Martin Luther, Philip Melanchthon, John Calvin, John Knox, the translators of the King James Bible, John Wesley, Sir Isaac Newton, Bishop J.C. Rylie,
Thomas Cranmer, Matthew Henry, Charles Spurgeon, Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones, and countless others. These weren’t Preterists or Futurists. They were
Historicists * – meaning they saw prophecy fulfilled throughout Church history until the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.
Let’s put emotions, personal opinion and speculation aside, and adjust our brains to facts–solid, unquestionable, irrefutable evidence. The beast
rises from the sea (13:1), looks like a lion, bear, and leopard (13:2), has ten horns (13:1), a mouth speaking great things (13:5), makes war on the
saints (13:7), and achieves global influence (13:7). Daniel chapter 7 talks about the same things, describing four beasts rising from the sea
(7:1-3), a lion, bear, leopard, and dragon-like animal with ten horns (7:4-7), a little horn with eyes like a man (7:8), a mouth speaking great things
(7:8), which makes war on the saints (7:21). Most scholars agree–both Protestant and Catholic–that Daniel’s little horn is the same as the beast
in Revelation 13:1. Each has a big mouth and makes war on the saints. These are all facts.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:18 PM by brotherkc
|
Here’s a key question: What is a beast? A man? A computer? The Bible provides the answer. An angelic interpreter told Daniel, “The fourth beast
shall be the fourth kingdom upon the earth” (Daniel 7:23). Thus a beast is a kingdom. Period. The four beasts are four kingdoms. Daniel was living
during the time of Babylon (7:1), and in fact, a winged lion was a symbol of that ancient power. Most scholars agree the lion represented Babylon,
followed by Persia, then Greece, then Rome. This is basic history. Rome fell in 476 AD and was divided among ten primary nations–Vandals, Heruli,
Ostrogoths, Visogoths, Franks, Anglo-Saxons, Suevi, Burgundians, Lombards, and Alemanni. Prophecy clearly predicted “the little horn” would:
Rise out of the fourth beast, or Roman Empire (7:7, 8)
Rise among the ten horns, in Western Europe (7:8)
Have eyes like a man, or human leadership (7:8)
Have a mouth speaking great things (7:8)
Make war on the saints (7:21)
Thus we have Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, Rome’s division, and then the little horn that is the same as the beast. Who is this horn? “Nero!”
shout Preterists. “The future Antichrist!” contend Futurists. What’s wrong with this picture? The answer should be obvious. Preterists are wrong
because the little horn (antichrist) especially gains power after Rome was divided into ten parts. Nero came 500 years too soon. Futurists fail
because the little horn burst into strength immediately after the empire of the Caesars collapsed into ten parts. The future-beast notion sweeps 1500
years of history under the proverbial rug by expecting the little horn to rise only after Christians vanish.
Preterism’s problem:
Lion (Babylon)
Bear (Persia)
Leopard (Greece)
Dragon-like animal (Rome)
Ten horns (Rome’s fall and division)
Little horn (Nero–this doesn’t fit)
Futurism’s failure:
Lion (Babylon)
Bear (Persia)
Leopard (Greece)
Dragon-like animal (Rome)
Insertion of a 1500-year gap
Ten horns (future revived Roman Empire)
Little horn (future Antichrist)
Historicism’s accuracy:
Lion (Babylon)
Bear (Persia)
Leopard (Greece)
Dragon-like animal (Rome)
Ten horns (Rome’s fall and division)
Little horn (rising into strength in Europe right after Rome fell)
Who is the little horn? Ask Luther, Melanchthon, Wycliffe, Huss, Jerome, Calvin, Knox, Wesley, Newton, Rylie, Cranmer, Spurgeon, and countless others.
To them, the answer was obvious. They all saw a present power that started small but grew into strength immediately after Rome fell, rose up in
Western Europe, had eyes like a man, a mouth speaking boastful things, and made bloody war on the saints.
It’s easy to write fiction books about an imaginary future Antichrist or a dead one. But to write non-fiction works about a present beast,
especially one with global influence–this isn’t so easy. Nor is it politically correct. Yet the question Jesus Christ bids us ponder is:
What is the truth?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:20 PM by brotherkc
|
The Bible says, “All the world wondered after the beast” (Revelation 13:3). It’s no secret that the majority of modern prophecy teachers apply
this prediction to the rise of one Mr. Bad Guy (the Antichrist) who will supposedly show up after the rapture. That’s the dominant view. Is it
correct?
“FBI Apologizes to American Lawyer Wrongly Arrested” was the title of an Associated Press story that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune on
May 26, 2004. A terrorist bombing had occurred in Spain killing 191 people and FBI fingerprint evidence pointed to Portland attorney Brandon Mayfield
- a Muslim - as the guilty one. Mayfield was thrown in jail. But the FBI soon discovered they had wrong man. The Tribune declared, “Court documents
released Monday suggested that the mistaken arrest first sprang from an error by the FBI’s supercomputer for matching fingerprints.” The
embarrassed agency then acknowledged the need to “review its practices on fingerprint analysis.”
When it comes to the beast, is it possible that the “fingerprint analysis” of many modern prophecy teachers is in error? Most expect the arrival
of a future Antichrist, but are they looking for the wrong man? Could the beast be here now?
Let’s review the evidence presented in Identifying the Beast (Part 1). The beast of Revelation 13:1-10 is the same as the “little horn” of
Daniel 7. Both have “a mouth speaking great things” (see Daniel 7:8; Revelation 13:5) and “make war with the saints (see Daniel 7:21; Revelation
13:7). Almost everyone agrees here. In Daniel 7, the plain prophetic sequence is:
The rise of a lion (verse 4)
The rise of a bear (verse 5)
The rise of a leopard (verse 6)
The rise of a fourth beast (verse 7)
The fourth beast has ten horns (verse 7)
Another little horn rises among the ten horns (verse 8)
The little horn had eyes like a man (verse 8)
The little horn had a mouth speaking great things (verse 8)
The little horn made war on the saints (verse 21).
An angel said, “The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon the earth” (Daniel 7:23). 98% of Christian scholars throughout history have
identified these four beasts as four kingdoms - Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome. It’s simple history, a no brainer. The controversy swirls around
the ten horns and the little horn. Futurists place the ten horns in the future (predicting a “revived Roman empire”) and think the “little
horn” refers to one Mr. Diabolical who shows up after we’re gone.
Preterists think the little horn is Nero who waged war against Christians in the first century. In Identifying the Beast! (Part 1), we saw fatal flaws
in both of these views. Futurists insert a 1500-year gap after the fall of Rome (thus breaking the successive sequence of Daniel 7), while preterists
fail to realize that the little horn bursts into strength after Rome’s division into ten parts, not before.
The ONLY SOLUTION that fits Daniel 7’s sequence sees Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, then Rome’s division into ten parts, and then the little horn
that is the same as the beast. Let me stress that this prophecy is not pointing its irrefutable finger against sincere people who don’t fully
understand the Scriptures. No. Its focus is a “kingdom” or beast-system (centered in one “man”) that is leading millions away from childlike
faith in the once-and-for-all sacrifice of Jesus Christ.
Who is the little horn? Are you ready? Martin Luther wrote that Daniel “saw the terrible wild beast which had ten horns, which by the consent of all
is the Roman Empire, he also beheld another small horn come up in the middle of this. This is the papal power, which rose up in the middle of the
Roman Empire”.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:21 PM by brotherkc
|
Martin Luther, John Wycliffe, John Knox, William Tyndale, John Calvin, John Wesley, Roger Williams, Fox’s Book of Martyrs, the translators of the
King James Bible, John Bunyan, the Westminster Confession, Sir Isaac Newton, Charles Spurgeon, David Benedict’s History of the Baptist Denomination,
Bishop J.C. Rylie, Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones, and countless other historic Protestants all believed the little horn of Daniel 7 was the global power of
the Roman Catholic Church which came out of the Roman Empire, rose up among the ten parts of Europe, is centered in one man (the Pope), has made war
with the saints in history, is a “kingdom” today (over 100 embassies stand on Vatican hill), and even now exerts global influence.
According to 400 years of Protestant scholarship (which shouldn’t be taken lightly), the beast is here now and has been operating for over a
thousand years. Again, this prophecy is not against sincere people who don’t fully understand the Bible - but against a system that leads away from
direct faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation and has introduced many subtle traditions into the Christian Church.
Preterists and futurists should “review their practices of fingerprint analysis.” Like the FBI in 2004, they have identified the wrong man.
Let’s not make the same mistake.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:24 PM by brotherkc
|
Will there be an "end of the world," or is such an idea simply the opinion of kooks who stand on street corners waving signs reading, "The End Is
Near"? Believe it or not, according to the Bible, yes, there will be an end. Jesus Christ promised His followers, "Lo, I am with you always, even to
the end of the world" (Matthew 28:20).
Are there any legitimate and observable "signs" indicative of this approaching finale? Once again, the answer is yes. While many supposed "signs"
appear daily on the covers of our nation's tabloids, here are seven true biblical signs worth listing:
1) Global Environmental Crisis: The Bible reveals that when God finally drops the curtain on human history, He will finally "destroy them that
destroy the earth" (Revelation 11:18). In other words, before the end, mankind will be destroying the very planet we live on. This implies a global
environmental crisis resulting from the growth of mega-cities, deforestation, a disappearing ozone layer, and earth-damaging man made pollutants.
2) Out-of-control Violence: Jesus Christ said, "As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be before the coming of the Son of Man" (Matthew 24:37).
What was it like in Noah's day before the flood? Here's the answer: "The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with
violence" (Genesis 6:11). "And God said to Noah, the end of all flesh is come before Me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and,
behold, I will destroy them with the earth" (Genesis 6:13). Thus "violence" was rampant in Noah's day, just like today.
3) Out-of-control Sex: Again, Jesus Christ said, "Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot…Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of Man
is revealed" (Luke 17:28, 30). What was it like in Lot's day before God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah? Here's the answer: "Even as Sodom and
Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth as an example,
suffering the vengeance of eternal fire" (Jude 7). Thus "fornication" (sex outside of marriage), and "going after strange flesh" (homosexuality),
were the primary sins of those ancient cities. It's a no-brainer that through television, Playboy, Internet pornography, etc., our world is
experiencing an unprecedented deluge of sexual perversion.
4) Increasing Stress, Confusion, Heart Disease: Jesus also declared, "And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and
upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those
things that are coming upon the earth" (Luke 21:25, 26). People are stressed-out everywhere, confusion reigns, and the Number 1 cause of death is
heart disease. Jesus Christ saw it coming, that's why He predicted global "distress," "perplexity" and "men's hearts failing them for fear."
Fear also raises blood cholesterol.
5) Increasing Knowledge: The prophetic book of Daniel declares, "But you, O Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, even to the time of the end:
many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased" (Daniel 12:4). This passage reveals planet Earth will enter its "time of the end."
Then, "knowledge shall be increased." In our modern era - more than any time in recorded history - knowledge has increased beyond previous
generations.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:26 PM by brotherkc
|
6) False Teaching and Global Religious Confusion: Paul predicted "the time will come" when the majority "shall turn their ears away from the truth
and shall turn to fables" (2 Timothy 4:4). God's final book - the Revelation - predicts the rise of a global, multi-layered, conglomerate religious
system called "Babylon," which literally means, "confusion." Heaven's end-time message proclaims, "Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great
city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication" (Revelation 14:8). This mysterious, highly symbolic prophecy
reveals that "all nations" will become drunk with "Babylon's wine" - meaning the worldwide false teachings of deceptive religions which lead away
from the simplicity of the pure gospel of Jesus Christ.
7) The Global Preaching of the Gospel: "And this gospel [the Good News of salvation through Jesus Christ] shall be preached in all the world as a
witness to all nations, and then shall the end come" (Matthew 24:14). With the aid of radio, television and satellite networks, God's message of
salvation through the death of Jesus Christ on the cross is now spreading around planet Earth. Thus, in the midst of Bad News, there's Good News! We
have a Savior who loves us, gave His life for us, rose from the dead for us, and will someday return to take us home.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:27 PM by brotherkc
|
Hours before George W. Bush beat John Kerry on November 2, 2004, an Associated Press article declared:
World Sees Huge Stake in U.S. Election – People outside the United States could only watch, wait and vent as Americans lined up to vote Tuesday in
an election that provoked an extraordinary degree of emotional involvement beyond U.S. borders. Not just leaders and news media, but ordinary people
were riveted by the contest between President Bush and John Kerry, convinced that a world roiled by the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq, the war on
terrorism, and cultural and religious conflict had a huge stake in the outcome…At the heart of the matter is a belief that in an era of
globalization, when American decisions affect hundreds of millions around the globe, the election is not a domestic U.S. issue…‘A day that will
decide the fate of the world,’ read a banner headline in Britain's Independent…‘Why shouldn't the Italians vote for the elections, too?’
said screenwriter Michele Cogo in Rome. ‘The planet's destiny is decided in large part by America.’ (1)
“A day that will decide the fate of the world” “The planet's destiny is decided in large part by America”–these aren’t minor sentences.
What happens in Washington DC affects the globe. In this light we inquire: Is America mentioned in Bible prophecy, or has God’s Word overlooked the
world’s only superpower?
Many prophecy writers emphatically state we’re not there. They see the US fading into oblivion under a supposedly future New World Order dominated
by the United Nations. In this article I want to give you something different to think about. I want to suggest the possibility that America is the
exact power specifically mentioned in this mysterious verse:
Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb and spoke like a dragon (Revelation 13:11).
Allow me to build my case. First, what is a “beast”? Answer: A great nation. The proof’s in Daniel 7–a chapter that clearly parallels
Revelation 13. Both chapters talk about beasts, ten horns, a mouth speaking great things, and war on the saints (see Daniel 7:3-8,21 and Revelation
13:1-7).
Daniel 7 describes four beasts: the lion, bear, leopard and dragon-like beast. An angelic interpreter confirmed:
The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom on earth (Daniel 7:23).
So we can nail this down: According to Scripture, a beast isn’t a computer or super-evil person, but a kingdom. That’s what the angel said.
Historically, 98% of Christian scholars have interpreted Daniel’s four beasts to represent the ancient nations of Babylon, Persia, Greece, and
Rome.
Back to Revelation 13:11:
I saw another beast coming out of the earth.
Thus John saw a great nation rising. From where? “Out of the earth.” Daniel’s beasts all rose from the sea (see Daniel 7:3-7). Water in prophecy
represents multitudes of people. Another angel confirmed:
The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations and tongues (Revelation 17:15).
Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome all rose from the midst of a sea of peoples in Europe and the Middle East. Not so with the beast in Revelation
13:11–it comes from the earth. This points to a great nation rising out of a sparsely inhabited area.
I saw another beast coming out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb (Revelation 13:11).
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 03:28 PM by brotherkc
|
Each word is significant. The true Lamb is Jesus Christ. “Like a lamb,” indicates this nation would have lamb-like or Christian features. A lamb
is a young animal, a baby sheep. Thus this nation would at one time be youthful and new. Significantly, its “two horns” have no crowns like the
first beast in Revelation 13:2. Crowns represent kingly power. Thus we have a new nation, with Christian features, rising out of a sparsely inhabited
area, with a government without kingly power. Are the pieces coming together yet?
Here’s the shocker: Revelation 13 also reveals that this exact nation will finally achieve superpower status during the last moments of time, make a
major mistake, and lead out in the global enforcement of the mark of the beast. God’s Word reports:
And he [the lamb-like beast] causes [he resorts to force] all [his power becomes global], both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to
receive a mark in their right hand or in their forehead, that no man might buy or sell [the world’s economy is involved] except the one who has the
mark (Revelation 13:16,17).
These verses parallel the last part of Revelation 13:11 describing the final, tragic act of the lamb-like beast–“he spoke like a dragon.”
Let’s put all the pieces together:
Revelation 13:11 predicts the rising of a great beast.
In prophecy, a beast represents a great nation.
This nation comes out of the earth, or wilderness area.
This nation starts out young, like a baby lamb.
This nation is lamb-like, with Christian characteristics.
This nation has horns with no crowns–it has no kings.
This nation achieves superpower status near the end of time.
This nation influences the world’s economy.
This nation finally speaks like a dragon.
This nation finally enforces the mark of the first beast in Revelation 13:2.
Be honest: How many nations on Planet Earth fit each of these clear, unquestionable, Heaven-inspired details? Only one.
The United States of America.
God has blessed America. Yet prophecy predicts major changes will someday envelop our beloved country and our eyes should be wide open to even now
discern the proverbial writing on the wall. May the Lord prepare us for future events. Above all, may we each have a strong relationship with the true
Lamb, Jesus Christ, and reject the dragon’s voice.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:07 PM by jnthemyst
|
Is this really neccessary brother KC? What is the point in trying to disprove someone when the truth will come in 3 months? All you are doing is
interpreting revelation the way you see it which is the same thing Weinland is doing.
[edit on 7-1-2008 by jnthemyst]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:44 PM by jnthemyst
|
Ok, after having read your posts, where is Weinland wrong in either of his books other than the fact that you think he's a false prophet? He has
basically said the same things in different terminology.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 08:27 AM by Vojvoda
|
Originally posted by TruthSeekers
APRIL 2008 IS THE BEGINING OF THE GREAT TRIBULATION ACCORDING TOO RONALD WEINLAND
Has anybody heard of this guy? I stumbled accross him the other day at his websites www.the-end.com... & www.ronaldweinland.com...
He seems too be a reputable member of the Church Of God and claims he is one of the Last Two Witnesses of which is stated in the Book Of
revelation of the Bible.
Another hoax or should I say false prophet.
The last two witnesses are Elijah and Enoch.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 08:43 AM by TruthSeekers
|
reply to post by Vojvoda
Well actaully i think the bible interprets that in a spiritual sense, as Ronald Weinland mentions this also. Elijah would come back in a spiritual
sense, not in the physical Elijah. More like somebody in his image would be the witness not him himself.
I have threads on this issue i have previously started. Alot of people think that there will be physical Elijah, however people always forgot the
spirtual meaning of the scriptures.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 10:15 AM by Vojvoda
|
reply to post by TruthSeekers
Because Elijah was took to Heaven alive, he will come back. The same for Enoch. They can't be resurrected if they don't die.
Both will come 7 years before 2nd arrival of Christ [in the same time antichrist will rise] and they will spread Christ words in Jerusalem. They will
die as martyrs and will be resurrected.
And Jesus Christ confirmed that Elijah will come before his second arrival - Matthew 17, 10-11. Also Revival 11, 3-7, Zechariah 4, 3, 11, 12, 14, and
Malachi 4,5.
Btw, that's the stand of Orthodox Church and I agree with it.
[edit on 8-1-2008 by Vojvoda]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 10:46 AM by TheArchAngel
|
In Mathew 17:12-13 Elijah is said to have come already and that he was identified as John the baptist. That destroys your theory.
10The disciples asked him, "Why then do the teachers of the law say that Elijah must come first?"
11Jesus replied, "To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. 12But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him,
but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands." 13Then the disciples understood that
he was talking to them about John the Baptist.
[edit on 8-1-2008 by TheArchAngel]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 10:53 AM by jdposey
|
BrotherKC I agree with you regarding your statement:
meaning the worldwide false teachings of deceptive religions which lead away from the simplicity of the pure gospel of Jesus Christ.
I posted this in another thread regarding those who feel the need to place themselves under the law:
II Corinthians 11:3
But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the SIMPLICITY that is in
Christ.
Why is it, Christians, fellow believers, are taking something so SIMPLE and transforming it into something complex?
As for saying you keep the Sabbath, as contained in the 10 commandments, BUT don't keep the Law of Moses, that is incorrect. They are not separate.
They are one in the same. If you are keeping the Sabbath, you are placing yourslef under the Law.
Think of it this way, the Law of Moses is God's Thesis and the 10 Commandments are the OUTLINE of that long thesis. Each commandment is broken down
in length as contained in the Law. You can boast that you keep the Sabbath but do not keep the Law. WRONG. And if you do keep the Sabbath, are you
keeping it to the tee as contained in the Law? Not breaking one jot or tittle of it? That is the deceptive part of these preachers that say you must
abstain from the Law but adhere to the 10 commandments. There is no way of doing that. They are one in the same.
Hebrews 4:3-11 speaks of a Sabbath that we, as believers in Christ MUST enter, but it has nothing to do with the actual DAY. It is entering into the
finished work of Christ upon the cross and RESTING from any effort of ours in finding favor with God. Everyone who is trying to keep the Sabbath,
trying to adhere to the Law is making the EXACT mistake Israel did in the desert. It is as if History is repeating itself right down to the core.
I close with this:Acts 15:10-11
10 Now therefore why TEMPT YE GOD, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples (Gentiles), which neither our fathers nor we(Israel) were able to
bear? 11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.
Acts 15: 19-20:
19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: 20 But that we write unto them, that they
abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
Bottom line is this, everyone under the Law of Moses in that time considered it a great burden (yoke) weighing them down in keeping the Law. They
couldn't keep it and why we should think we can do better, is truly deceiving ourselves.
Why do you think Jesus made the statement?
Matthew 11:30:
For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.
So don't confuse the 10 commandments and the Law of Moses as being two separate things, they are one in the same and, as of to date, not one man has
been able to adhere to any of it except Jesus, hence, that is why by faith in his finished work his righteousness is imputed to you and you are as if
you are righteous, as if you had never sinned.
Hebrews 4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.
When you are IN Christ, you are free from the law and where there is no law, how can anything condemn you of sin? Hence: Romans 8:1
THERE IS THEREFORE NOW NO CONDEMNATION to them that are in Christ Jesus
1.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 11:22 AM by Vojvoda
|
@TheArchAngel
Btw, it's not my theory, it's the stand of Orthodox Church.
Look at John 1:21:
So they asked him, "What are you then? Are you Elijah?" And he said, "I am not." "Are you the Prophet?" He answered, "No."
So, John the Baptist wasn't Elijah as he himself denied.
Even more in Luke 1:13-17:
13 But the angel said to him, "Do not be afraid, Zechariah, because your prayer has been heard. Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you
shall name him John.
---------------
And because Elijah was took alive by Good, he couldn't be born again.
---------------
14 And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth,
15 for he will be great in the sight of (the) Lord. He will drink neither wine nor strong drink. He will be filled with the holy Spirit even from his
mother's womb,
16 and he will turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God.
17 He will go before him in the spirit and power of Elijah to turn the hearts of fathers toward children and the disobedient to the
understanding of the righteous, to prepare a people fit for the Lord."
He did it like Elijah before him, but he wasn't Elijah's reincarnation.
What is said in Mathew 17:10-13 doesn't contradict to the rest. So, John the Baptist was 'in the spirit and power of Elijah' [Luke 1:17].
And don't forget Malachi 4:5-6:
"Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and terrible day of the Lord comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their
children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the land with a curse."
[edit on 8-1-2008 by Vojvoda]
[edit on 8-1-2008 by Vojvoda]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 12:40 PM by brotherkc
|
The "2008" book is full of lies and deception. Period. It is un-biblical! Yes I have read it for myself!
The biggest question I have after reading this book is this: Why did God send us Jesus, to live a sinless life here on Earth and die for our sins on
the cross, as the perfect sacrifice in fulfillment of the Law?
Also,
P. 170 - 4th Paragraph States: "As we enter the next 1,100 years, salvation will begin to be offered to all of mankind."
REALLY? This is AFTER the resurrection? AFTER the 1000 year reign?
The Bible says in Matthew 24:4 Jesus answered: "Watch out that no one deceives you. 5For many will come in my name, claiming, 'I am the Christ,'
and will deceive many. 6You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is
still to come. 7Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8All these are
the beginning of birth pains.
9"Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me. 10At that time many will
turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, 11and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. 12Because of the increase
of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13but he who stands firm to the end will be saved. 14And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached
in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
P.154 of the book states "Mankind does not know why God created him" and "human life is a great marvel".
P.163 "God is reproducing himself"
These statements are unbiblical and full of lies and deception.
I recommend Rick Warren's book "The Purpose Driven Life" for anyone who needs to know why God created mankind. This book uses truth from the Bible
to explain this. God created man to glorify himself. Period.
P.163 "We cannot become a part of God's family with our current selfish nature because it is the opposite of God's nature. It is only through the
experience of human life of being made physical (as mortal human beings) with the selfish nature that such a life produces that we can ever come to
see (learn) what God is like when he begins to reveal himself to us."
REALLY? I recommend everyone go to this book and read page 163!!!
Then note this...
GOD HAS REVEALED HIMSELF TO US! IT IS IN THE GOSPEL!
16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son,[f] that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17For God
did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever
does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.
I will continue....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 01:22 PM by jnthemyst
|
"God made man to glorify himself"
That sounds like vanity and pride. A selfish God wouldn't tell his creation to be unselfish would he? If so, that would make him a pride filled
hypocrite wouldn't it?
There might be something along those lines in scripture, it sounds familiar but I think you're taking it out of context.
[edit on 8-1-2008 by jnthemyst]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 01:25 PM by Quazga
|
Originally posted by Pericle
No point to be afraid. There is no such thing as end. Only change. If World War 3 will happen, then it means we failed as a civilization in many
aspects, but we already had 2 World Wars. This third one, if it happens, will have a huge impact and change awarness and values in people. In the end
it might create a better society.
Hope for the best and never be afraid of change.
It would not mean we failed as a civilization. No civilization or organism is supposed to live forever. All of these are merely vehicles of
transistion for life as a whole in the most abstract.
Life will go on, even if it is roaches running around, it is life.
But the fall of a civilization is not a failure, it is simply a breakdown which is very natural.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2008 @ 01:27 PM by Quazga
|
Originally posted by jnthemyst
"God made man to glorify himself"
That sounds like vanity and pride. A selfish God wouldn't tell his creation to be unselfish would he? If so, that would make him a pride filled
hypocrite wouldn't it?
There might be something along those lines in scripture, it sounds familiar but I think you're taking it out of context.
[edit on 8-1-2008 by jnthemyst]
Any God who says "There is no God but me" Seems kinda selfish to me.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
<< 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>
|
|
|