Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
LOL! No, I don't believe the fable as anything more than a story. That said however, I can appreciate the genius it took to put the whole thing
together (story, photos, etc...) and hold to that for months never wavering in the story or exposing yourself. Then to disappear and have people still
debating years later? Having a legion of followers? Have certain parts of the story for the most part intact (meaning the story have not been 100%
debunked by hundreds or thousands of people).
So has religion.. but we both know that's a big filthy lie, don't we? Oh hmm sorry that's just me

The point is, ANYONE and ANYTHING can have a
whole #load of followers, because people will follow anything! That alone doesn't say anything about authenticity of it.
Anyone would have to admit. It took some smarts to do that.
As for your issue that Christianity wouldn't survive the scientific proof of multiple worldlines. How did it manage to survive the science of
evolution? Hmmmm?
Well we didn't evolve from monkeys. It's not a science, it's a theory. We know we're not related to neanderthals. The thing is, on his world
"worldlines" aren't theoretical, they are FACT. They move through them, so for him there is no question. The idea that humans evolved from monkeys
is by no means a fact. And you are right, Christianity did survive many things... but only in the general population. I mean, how does it survive in
the single PERSON who knows for fact that there are infinite worldlines, and travels through them? So he then goes home and completely contradicts his
entire reality with the idea of Christianity? All in one man? That seems very unlikely. Knowledge and ignorance don't mix. If you don't know, you
fill your empty mind with belief and religious concepts. If you know, you have no such need.
"It is contradicting the simple idea of the Bible etc... and that means God could never give commandments to anyone since every possible action HAS
been done by YOU on another worldline. God can't judge you anymore, since you DID EVERYTHING in every possible situation."
You cannot believe in the possibility of multiple worldlines or "string" theory, but you will fully believe a book written by who-knows based fully
on faith?
Are you talking to me here? I never said belief anything.. I'm just refering to the claims of Titor and Alex, and his world.
Well, Christianity seems to survive despite that pesky science stuff. All it takes is faith.
Faith just means you allow for the possibility of all things, until you know otherwise or stumble upon a paradox. But if you already know otherwise,
continuing faith in a previously-believed illusion just means ignorance. In HIS world, they already know otherwise.
For millennia, people have debated what is the ratio of the perimeter to the diameter of a circle. On the one hand, the Bible clearly states that the
first temple contained a circular structure with a perimeter of 30 cubits and a diameter of 10 cubits, giving an exact ratio of 3. On the other hand
mathematicians blindly ignore this truth and claim that the result is closer to 3.14.
So God and science seem at odds on this...but both survive.
Well people are divided in what to believe. But no one believes BOTH. If you know it to be 3.14, you cannot at the same TIME know it to be 3. It's
either 3 or 3.14. So some people choose one, some choose another. But no ONE PERSON can choose both. That is my problem with Titor and Alex. They
decided they CAN choose both, 2 things that completely contradict one another in ONE PERSON's MIND... (not talking about overall population)
How about the fact that Greek fatalism, embodied in Aristotle's argument of De interpretatione 9, posed a special threat to Christian theology.
Committed to the biblical doctrine of divine foreknowledge as well as to human freedom, Christian thinkers had to explain how it is either that God
knows future contingents without future contingent propositions' being antecedently true or false or that God's knowing the truth value of such
propositions does not after all entail fatalism. The problem of theological fatalism seemed especially acute since God's foreknowledge of some future
event is itself a fact of past history and therefore temporally necessary; that is to say, it no longer has any potential to be otherwise. Therefore,
what God foreknew must necessarily come to pass, since it is impossible that God's knowledge be mistaken.
More science versus the bible.
And if it doesn't, he is no longer God. Therefore the entire religion worships someone who is NOT God, but an imposter. Therefore, it is based on a
lie and a false assumption.
How about the fact that people think God is perfect? Perfection is in the eye of the beholder. No one can please everyone, neither can God. What's
good for one person is bad for another. God cannot be only what you want him to be, that'd means he doesn't exist in objective reality, but only in
your mind. Once again that would base Christianity on a lie and a false assumption that there is some God out there. Perfection is subjective and
relative. No 2 people can agree fully on what a perfect God would have to be or do... so how can he exist and be perfect for both of them?
Paradox...
Sorry God, you struck out a long time ago