It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mogget
The second largest asteroid (2 Pallas) has an orbital inclination of over 40 degrees, so the orbit of Ceres is hardly unique.
I really wish that people would stop wasting their time over this Nibiru myth.
Originally posted by Incarnated
While looking at the asteroid belt, and looking at the orbital pattern of the dwarf planet Ceres1 I thought it looked like a strong case for understanding the reality of the orbital pattern for Niribu.
It’s been suggested that Niribu, here idealistically a brown dwarf star with orbital planets of its own, smashed into a progenitor planet, Tiamut, that later became the earth in a lower orbital plain and left the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.
The largest known object in that asteroid belt is Ceres1, a dwarf planet, that has a strong tilt in it’s orbital plain.
Wouldn’t this be looked at as strong evidence to the tilted orbit of Niribu and also that there was in fact a collision event? I feel it is so because if it were not the case the object Ceres1 should share the same orbital plain as the asteroid belt.
Here's a link to the info about Ceres
[edit on 27-11-2007 by Incarnated]