It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


How old is Humanity anyway?

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 27 2007 @ 01:57 AM
I am one of several who seriously believe that us Humans have been around far longer than we are led to believe.

Just by looking at the history we are aware of suggests that time after time, civilizations come and go. Methods of living change, beliefs change, science changes.

One of the most modern dilemmas is the Sphinx in Egypt. Some suggest it is far older than is currently thought. So what does tis mean for us?

Not much if we don't consider the possibility and try to learn from it rather than ridicule it or try to hide it away and pretend it doesn't exist.

The age of the Sphinx is on par with the existence of UFO's. If the truth were known, then there may possibly be a huge upset in the current society that causes major upset and loss of control for those in control who want to keep us all as sheeple.

So taking this into consideration and going on a research ramble, I dug up some info that leads you deeper into the past.

All types of theories come into your head. Time travelling tourists having some fun with 'ornaments' they picked up on their way back in time. Dimension jumpers hunting dinosaurs and not realising they would leave footprints that fossilize for us to find.

Or, we are far far older than we ever possibly imagined.

You decide..

Human bones, foot and handprints and artifacts have been found in rock and coal deposits which evolutionists claim is millions and even billions of years old. If that were true, there would be no way to account for these oddities, since man is supposed to have evolved in the recent past. The geological time frame is very obviously wrong.

A fossilized handprint in rock was found near Glen Rose Texas.

A fossilized human skull was found in coal that was sold in Germany (mid-1800s). A jawbone of a child was found in coal in Tuscany (1958). Two giant human molars were found in Montana (1926). A human leg was found by a West Virginia coal miner. It had changed into coal.

A woman, in Illinois, reportedly found a gold chain in a chunk of coal which broke open (1891). A small steel cube was found in a block of coal in Austria (1885). An iron pot was found in coal in Oklahoma (1912). A woman found a child's spoon in coal (1937)

Man-made markings on petrified wood.

Evolutionists declare that petrified wood is millions of year old, yet humans have worked with it.

Hand-worked petrified wood was found in India. It was shaped prior to fossilization.

Prior to mineralization, several petrified pieces of wood had been hacked with a cutting tool. The wood was dated to the Pliocene Epoch, before humans were supposed to have lived.

Man-made markings on bones.

At a site near Paris, France, fossilized rhinoceros bones had human cutting marks on them. No rhinos have been in Europe in recorded history. Another rhino bone, cut by a sharp tool, was found in Ireland. … Ancient Man

A letter to Nature in 1873 reported the discovery in Miocene strata of a fragment of bone probably belonging to a dinotherium and engraved with a picture of a horned quadruped and traces of several other figures.

This discovery implies the existence of an intelligent creature capable of art work some 25 million years ago.

So, how do we explain the likes of skeletons called 'Lucy"

Or things like Human time lines....

How do these things combine to give a true depiction of our historic status.
Have we co-existed with all of the above examples and been so unaware of it, or is it one of the secrets that the 'powers-that-be' don't want us to know, in particular, religious teachings.

And consider this...

These people were alive in our time frame.

So, where have we been, where are we going as a race?

posted on Nov, 27 2007 @ 02:25 AM
reply to post by Extralien

I think we'd need information from more sources that corroborates the evidence on the site to which you've linked. While I wouldn't go so far as to say that humans couldn't possibly be older than is generally accepted, a lot of that evidence seems to be somewhat shaky. Since there are so few, isolated cases, I'd say they're more than likely fabricated, mistaken, or anomalous in some other way. However, I don't think scientists would have any problem with humans being an older species, provided there's credible evidence to support that hypothesis.

posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 05:27 PM
Why didn't this thread receive more attention!!?!?

Honestly, I htink we are way off on what is being taught to our youth! Humans have been around way longer than whats perceived as truth by the masses.

I found this thread after reading some articles related to the history of man and how so much evidence points towards man existance being, at least 100 million years old.

posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 05:30 PM
If the precession of the equinox is 26,000 years and humanity mapped out the entire process, along with the influences of certain positions within that orbit I would imagine we have been around a long time.

Couple that with the same cycle mapped as yugas in another region of the world and I think we are well on our way to a great conversation.


new topics

top topics

log in