Enjoyed no, understood yes. Chaos reigns. The horses ride.

If there is to be a New World Order, could Clinton rightly be said to be an agent of it, if this memorial was constructed during his term in office?

Originally posted by Jim_Kraken
If there is to be a New World Order, could Clinton rightly be said to be an agent of it, if this memorial was constructed during his term in office?

I would not think that is the case. Yes, Clinton did establish this in 1997 and FDR did deserve this memorial. I thought this brought it to the forefront the FDR did know about the NWO back then and going by what is printed in stone, I would say he opposes it. (at least I would like to think so)

Originally posted by jpm1602
Enjoyed no, understood yes. Chaos reigns. The horses ride.

Sorry you did not enjoy.

this is a pretty good find. well not good in the nwo sence, but neat to see. maybe some sign.

but it would seem to me that the powers that seek this would not have allowed it if it were true. that is in less they might have believed most people that saw it would think he was a nutter or just simpily wouldnt understand.

its a good thing we can all come together and deny ignorance.

Clinton, another shill in the hole, I wonder how they do that? Take a half way decent man and turn him into...not sure what.

The first statement is brilliant and i'm going to have this as a sig for some time

I loved the statements and all but, don't NWO-related theories state that World Wars, among other wars, occur to make profits? I have heard that FDR secretly wanted war, during World War II, and thus allowed the events at Pear Harbor to occur. Theories I have heard have made him a NWO proponent. How can this be if these statements are on his memorial?

He was opposed to it about as much as I'm for it.

In 1933, a series of programs and laws was initiated by Franklin Roosevelt called "The New Deal". Basically what it did was created programs under federal agencies; some ruled unconstitutional, others exist to this day, such as Social Security.

We all know what a great tool that is.

Another thing it did was give greater economic power to the federal government. More control over the economy.

Of course, this was all in response to the Federal Reserve manufactured 'Great Depression'.

Manufacture an economic collapse, get everyone selling their assets, you buy all their assets, buy up the bankrupt banking systems, and there you have it - control.

Problem, reaction, solution.

So this was in response to the Great Depression. More economic control to the federal government means that control and power gets sent to the Federal Reserve - the ones who initiated the problem to get the control in the first place.

So the plan's on track. If you don't think so, look no further than this quote:

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws."
- Mayer Rothschild

Then comes the rise of Hitler, of course funded by people like the Rockefeller's and the Rothschild's, as well as American companies like IBM, along with many others.

The rise of Hitler eventually leads to World War II. Notice how now in the 26 years after the induction of the Federal Reserve banking system, a second world war has started. That's because it's a private central bank run by international bankers who print money, illegally tax the American people, and borrow from an endless supply of monetary value called the national debt. This creates endless funding for what ever projects you want to go through. World War's I and II were projects of theirs.

Let's not forget what else World War II brought..

Pearl Harbor.

The same Pearl Harbor that happened under FDR's watch, and the same Pearl Harbor that very much appears to be not only provoked, but completely ignored and allowed to happen.

Certainly he would know about that beforehand. Others did.

So you have World War II, a key event in world history leading towards global control, and the United States isn't in it. But we have to be in it, right?

Pearl Harbor

Problem, reaction, solution.

What happened after World War II?

The United Nations

Who played a role in the creation of the United Nations?

Franklin Roosevelt

What is the United Nations for?

NEW
WORLD
ORDER

Franklin Roosevelt wasn't one of those great presidents that knew what was going on and opposed it. He was a puppet just like most of them are and have been for a very long time.

Don't be fooled by words carved in to a monument. If that's all it takes to dismiss someone as a suspect, then I guess George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and the rest of the criminally "elected" officials who currently lead our country really did have nothing to do with 9/11, and really did want to go in to Iraq only because of the false information about WMD's - that they didn't know were false, by the way.

So there you have it. That's how it is. If you think these are just my opinion, then that's good enough for me. They're facts to me, though.

I don't have any links, sources, information, data, videos, or pictures to give you. All I have is what I know, and that's what I typed above. If you don't believe it, that's your call. But I suggest looking more in to it and not being fooled by something as simple as "writing on the wall," so to speak.

Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
Don't be fooled by words carved in to a monument.

That's what I am thinking, too. See my post directly above yours .

I don't like or believe the "everything that happens is a conspiracy" mentality. Life happens. To me, it seems like a lot of fantasy prone individuals like to look back over history and pretend that it was all arranged perfectly by some shadowy boogieman, while ignoring or twisting any facts that oppose their views to support their own agendas.

All of the statements that FDR made that were etched into stone on his memorials were spoken against the Nazi regime. It is not hard to understand them in that context.

Originally posted by zerotime
I don't like or believe the "everything that happens is a conspiracy" mentality.

I don't like or believe the "nothing is a conspiracy because everything that happens isn't a conspiracy" mentality.

Originally posted by zerotime
To me, it seems like a lot of fantasy prone individuals like to look back over history and pretend that it was all arranged perfectly by some shadowy boogieman,

It's pretend? Based on what? Have you done the research? Or are you just saying it's pretend to slide yourself in to the convenient role of not having to put up the effort to find any facts while also remaining in the quiet world where world leaders don't conspire with anyone and anything released by an "official" source happened exactly as they say it did?

Originally posted by zerotime
while ignoring or twisting any facts that oppose their views to support their own agendas.

Any proof of this? Or is this your opinion?