Battleship UFO, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 26-11-2007 @ 06:30 AM by eaglewingz
reply to post by h3akalee



Yes, there is a previous thread where the consensus was that it is a fire on a hillside. You can even see the gray smoke.

I'll see if I can find it.

Edit : Ok, found it.

Here is the most relevent post[/url]

Originally posted by Gazrok(emphasis added)

According to the author and videographer, these videos were the same area, and all show the hill, so the author himself is establishing that there is a high hill there beyond the streetlights (easily seen in video 12). We've also got the description from the videographer of the "object" "hugging the hills". So, regardless of WHAT the light is from, we CAN easily establish the presence of a high hill there....

Then, we have the absence of any movement of the lights in the video...they are stationary.

So now we have stationary lights, on or above a high hill.

So we're left with two conclusions....either it's some kind of stationary "object" on the hill, or an airborne object hovering slightly above the hill, in which the videographer for some reason never continued filming until it left the scene, but instead ONLY while it was motionless. So, which is more plausible?


[edit on 11/26/2007 by eaglewingz]


reply posted on 26-11-2007 @ 08:09 AM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by eaglewingz



Yeah -- the first thing I thought of while watching this was "hillside"...but I thought it was cars parked on the hillside -- the red being tail lights and the grey color being trees lit up by their headlights. A fire seems more likely, and more to the correct scale of the scene.

One would think that a person would't only film the motionless ship, but would wait around to film the ship while it was moving. I know I wouldn't leave until the ship did.


reply posted on 26-11-2007 @ 10:29 AM by kozmo
Ok, same video - taken by a member of ATS named Worldblend. Visit This Thread for more info on the video.

I have linked yout o page 8 that has the full, unedited video but recommend that you read the entire thread as Worldblend gives alot of data on this recording, including a daylight video fo teh area. VERY fascinating to say the least.


reply posted on 26-11-2007 @ 03:38 PM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by azzllin


I'm not trying to be difficult here...it's just that I don't see anything "turning". I do see another batch of what I see as flames kick up to the right of the main group of "flames" then die down again.

If the ship was "turning", wouldn't the red lights on the left hand side change with the change of perspective caused by the UFO turning?

Truely, my first impression of this video upon seeing it were "lights on a hill". Then I read some of these posts saying it was a fire, and that made much more sense. But I never once saw this as a "floating object".

EDIT TO ADD:
reply to post by D.Gribble


...and not only that, if it were a UFO hovering for many hours, don't you think a news crew would have been there to film it?

[edit on 11/26/2007 by Soylent Green Is People]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 16 hours ago, 116 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 12 hours ago, 99 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 63 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 14 hours ago, 50 replies