posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 04:43 PM
I'm watching this for the first time and it's great.
It's a ton of direct and circumstantial evidence that supports ufology.
All a skeptic has is their opinion. They equate their opinion to actual evidence and that just slaps reason in the face.
Direct evidence - eyewitness accounts from pilots, astronauts, military, police officers and more.
Circumstantial evidence - cave paintings, ancient manuscript, paintings, pictures and video
I think it's time for the skeptics to be regulated to the fringe and people who let Reason be their guide look deeper into these things.
Skeptics are useful but there's a difference between healthy skepticism and denial based on belief.
Most so called skeptics are denying the obvious based on their pre-existing belief system.
Again, there's ZERO evidence on the other side of ufology. All the skeptic has is his/her opinion. They say things like it "had" to be this, or
it "must" be that. This is belief talking.
Those who study ufology are going on eyewitness accounts from very credible witnesses when it comes to direct evidence and their own eyes when it
comes to circumstantial evidence.