Summary
1. The overall purpose of the study described in the document was to discriminate between natural and manmade seismic events in an effort to
effectively enforce a nuclear test ban treaty;
2. The document was not written for laymen, but would be of interest to anyone studying seismology and/or nuclear physics;
3. The document contains a number of interesting diagrams;
4. The data obtained was from seismometer networks installed at mining facilities in Kazakhstan and Russia, and at a former nuclear test site in
China. In the case of China, the document includes data for three specific events at or near the Lop Nor test facility - an earthquake and two nuclear
explosions;
5. The authors verified that a particular seismic event, the collapse of a salt mine in the Urals on January 5, 1995, was probably natural in
origin;
6. The authors confirmed that an explosion in the area of an existing fault will likely trigger a seismic event, and that a shallow seismic event in a
low-seismicity area can indicate a "suspicious event";
7. The authors discerned distinct differences in data sets according to the type of event recorded and concluded that such data can definitively
identify a seismic event as a mining blast, mine collapse, nuclear explosion, or natural or manmade tectonic event.
[edit on 11/25/2007 by PrplHrt]

