Labor claims Australia poll win, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 06:13 AM by OzWeatherman
reply to post by Shar_Chi



Totally agree with you, and who can forget his workplace agreements, another typical example of screwing the middle and lower class people of this country. Typical Liberal party politics. And who can forget his rate rises, absolutely ridiculous how many of these we had while he was in office


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 06:17 AM by Rilence
reply to post by Shar_Chi



Agreed, Shar_Chi...

Howard has been the most deliberately divisive PM we have had for a generation, at least...

He has played the race card several times...First Tampa, and in more recent times demonising Muslims at every possible opportunity...

He has deliberately taken away the rights of many working Australians to be compensated fairly for their work, at the expense of their employers pocketing most or all of the profits made as a result of their employees work...

Howard will be remembered by a majority of Australians as a crusty, out of touch old man who belonged in the political era of the 50's and 60's

And thank goodness, the public has finally seen him for what he is....

Peace


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 06:19 AM by Rilence
reply to post by OzWeatherman



He was a fool to even think about making a guarantee about interest rates, OzWeather...

Governments have next to zero control over interest rates...They run fiscal policy, the reserve runs monetary policy...Simple really...

And don't get me started about WorknoChoices

Let's hope Labor is honest in its promise to roll back most of this horrendous legislation...

Peace


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 06:54 AM by Shar_Chi
Well the Reserve Bank, being Australia's arm of the Global Banking system rewards fascist behaviour, which is why Howard's policies carried so much favour. The fact that the RB raised rates in the middle of the campaign, combined with the backing from Murdoch's media outlets, and a lackluster performance from the PM supports the earlier suggested theory that the Libs were forced to take a dive on this one, which is an uncomforting thought indeed.

Also, low variable interest rates are nothing more than a temporary illusion. Housing prices around the country have skyrocketed, putting Australians in deeper debt than ever before, and now the rates are rising as well so the trap is swiftly closing and foreclosures are at levels never seen before. Rudd's housing policies will be absolutely paramount to the future security of most young Australians and they don't even know it yet.

One other thing I'll mention about the economic boom throughout Howard's era, is the groundwork was laid by the prior Labor Government reforms, who were saddled with ridiculous debt from the Fraser era, something which Gen Y's don't have the foggiest clue about. Howard was the lucky one who waltzed in during an unprecedented bull market, and whacked us with a goddamn GST. They had so much cash coming in, they could have put the WIGGLES in charge.

My view of the 2 parties is that they both chain us to the pyramid, but Labor makes sure everyone gets a smoko and a BBQ on the weekend, whereas Liberal will stick the boot in if you stumble. Of course, I didn't vote for either of them.

People have a lot to learn in a short period of time or we'll be doomed to repeat the mistakes all over.


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 07:28 AM by Rilence
reply to post by Shar_Chi



The MASSIVE mistake the Liberals have made during the last 5-6 yrs has been tax cuts...

Not only are they not necessary, but they are eventually inflationary...There should have been a contribution of say 25% of the surplus each year into the "Future Fund", and another 25% of surplus could go towards infrastructure, health, education...

Tax cuts imho were totally unnecessary....

Lets hope Labor learns from these errors...And runs surpluses at 1% of GDP and more, and actually contributes to the growth of the country, rather than giving surpluses back to consumers to "pee up against a wall", so to speak...

Peace and good posts on this thread Shar



reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 10:26 AM by Rilence
reply to post by primal



Actually, Rudd has committed to removing all COMBAT troops from Iraq by mid next year...Afghanistan is another issue and nothing was mentioned either way there, except to maintain the status quo...

And given the situation there atm, I'm sure a majority of Australians wouldn't disagree with that...

As far as the economic stuff goes...

The fact remains the Howard government pissed away a lot of the recent surpluses in tax cuts, rather than using this money where it was need most in health, education and P/P relationships in building infrastructure...

Whether this will change remains to be seen...

Anyone condemning the Rudd Government 24 hrs after it has "come into power" is an imbecile IMO...

40 billion deficit under Labor previously ? source please...

Low interest rates ? Now....These have to be considered in the context of home ownership affordability, not as raw interest rates...

Home ownership affordability is at multi decade lows here in Australia...

The insane thing the coalition tried to do last election was to stop within a millimeter of guaranteeing interest rates would be lower under their govt than under a labor alternative...

That's madness...

Time will tell here...My main issue is as long as the new government ceases and desists with tax cuts...

We do not need them...They do more harm than good to common folk in the medium term thru higher prices and higher interest rates...

Spending on infrastructure via state grants and investing in the Future fund is the way to go with the bulk of budget surpluses....



[edit on 25-11-2007 by Rilence]


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 10:56 AM by Ste2652
An interesting (if unexpected) piece of fallout from the election is that Peter Costello has decided not to stand for leader of the Liberal Party.

For those from the UK, a pretty good comparison would be Gordon Brown deciding not to take over as Labour leader after Blair stepped down.


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 11:01 AM by Rilence
reply to post by Ste2652



It is interesting for sure, Ste...

Personally, I see it as a dummy spit on Costello's part...

I know many people want to make the NWO connection with Turnbull and so on, but before you do so...Consider that Costello has been a senior member of the HR Nichols Society here in Oz for a long time...

They have always been at the forefront of extreme right wing thinking since their inception...

I would have thought Costello as leader and Turnbull as deputy would have satisfied all fascists concerned at least for the medium term...

Alas its not to be and big Mal will have his wicked way with the remaining Libs...


Peace


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 11:07 AM by Rilence
reply to post by mad scientist



If Australian workers are required to work "outside" their normal working hours, they deserve to be compensated for same...

They do not deserve to be paid the same for working weekends as opposed to 9am-5pm...they do not deserve to be paid the same for working 8pm-6am as opposed to working 9am-5pm...

Now...If employers large and VERY small were reasonable and offered people a bonus based on the profitability of the business from year to year in exchange for working for a flat rate no matter the shift....

then that would be a different kettle of fish...

In my experience, small (particularly) and medium business have been most eager to rout employees conditions in order to maximise their own profits...Without even distributing a pittance of said profits in thanks for the hard work of their employees who have been largely responsible for these profits....

thats my beef...

Its a matter of what is fair and reasonable. and thank goodness, that is what sets this great nation apart from many other nations....

Peace


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 11:20 AM by primal
reply to post by Rilence



Imbecile? We'll see.

I'm sorry the deficit was actually 10 billion, so much better.

Labor will withdraw the 550 “combat” troops from Australia’s 1575-strong force in and around Iraq, leaving more than 1000 personnel. But Labor will also replace the “combat” troops with hundreds of “training” troops that will be stationed outside Iraq so they will be serving in the middle east but ultimately supporting the remaining 1000 troops in Iraq.

So all you suckers that voted Liberal on that issue looks like you fell for the old ball under the cup switcheroo IMO.

As for home loans I'd rather 6% that I pay now compared to the previous Labour governments 17%.



reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 11:33 AM by Rilence
reply to post by primal




A word of advice to a new member...

If you're going to post such outlandish numbers, make sure you post a reliable source to back you up...

*hands you a tea towel to wipe the egg off your face over the 40 billion thing*

Now...

Labor will withdraw those combat troops and perhaps send some to Afghanistan in order to assure the US control over the majority of the worlds opium supply...

Or, hopefully...some of those guys will get to come home and be set to do base duties for a long time to re-adjust to society...


"So all you suckers that voted Liberal on that issue looks like you fell for the old ball under the cup switcheroo IMO
"

Wtf are you talking about ?? which side are you on ? confused are we ?

When home loan rates were at 17% a far greater proportion of the population could afford to own their own home...

Now, that is a pipedream for more than half of us....



[edit on 25-11-2007 by Rilence]


reply posted on 25-11-2007 @ 11:53 AM by primal
Originally posted by Rilence
reply to
post by primal




A word of advice to a new member...

If you're going to post such outlandish numbers, make sure you post a reliable source to back you up...

*hands you a tea towel to wipe the egg off your face over the 40 billion thing*

Now...

Labor will withdraw those combat troops and perhaps send some to Afghanistan in order to assure the US control over the majority of the worlds opium supply...



[edit on 25-11-2007 by Rilence]


Wow exulted ATS member, speak of outlandish claims, don't worry bout the opium you need to get off the weed cause obviously the paranoia is setting in.

And if owning a home is a pipe dream for ya then may be you need to work a little harder cause nobody's goin to hand it to you, which is the real problem in Australia that so many expect so much for doing so little. That's WTF I,m talking about.

And as far as me typing Liberal instead of Labour it was a simple mistake so don't be an a-hole
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 11 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 6 hours ago, 50 replies