It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Jimmy_of_wprt
I am not sure of your personal thoughts, but I will put those in the list of questions actually.
I'm actually not negative on Friedman and respect the work he's done. I guess you could say I'm just a little irked and think he's stuck in a rut. I wish he would address himself to the newer stuff.
Originally posted by CKYTEP
Was the recording made? Link?
Originally posted by Outrageo
Ask him this:
As a scientist (former nuclear physicist), can he corroborate, or at least validate, to the extent he is certain, that the Zeta Reticuli star map as drawn by Betty Hill following her abduction was not knowledge gained after the fact as opposed to an image as she reported seeing inside the wall of the alien spacecraft and as shown to her by her alien abductors?
OK - it's a mouthful, I know. Here it is in 'simpler' language:
Mr. Friedman, as a scientist, how can you be so sure that Betty Hill's star map is something she actually saw inside the alien craft rather than something she learned about later and just claimed it was shown to her by her alien abductors?
That is interesting point. He just finished a book about this actually, So I have added your question to the list for the next interview.
I my self have just started reading about the Hill's and you put it better then I could but it was something I thought of as well. Could she have gained that information before hand. I tried looking up information (just breifly) about when the Zeta Reticuli was officially labeled to see if there could have been a possibility that it was information obtained before hand by Mrs Hill.
Thanks for that one btw.
[edit on 25-11-2007 by Jimmy_of_wprt]