I think they should have a warrant in hand if uninvited because most people are not going to say no even if they know they have the right to.
Also, this like inviting Dracula into your house. You authorized the police to search your kids rooms, you invited them into your home- They claim
that they will not prosecute unless the gun(s) found have been involved with crimes, or not care if there's a three foot long bong shrouded in a wall
of smoke sitting in the living room. C'mon-
As stated before, if they happen to see Grandpa Jed's rifle hanging on the wall, you mean to tell me they're not gonna ask to see an FID card, (
Firearms Identification Card in MA. )? What if you don't have one what then?
EDIT TO ADD: Or a registration for the rifle which is required by law?
And most importantly, as also stated previous-
If you decline to let them search they will wonder if it's because you are hiding something. It's human nature to do so. Especially for law
enforcement personnel.
And to the people that say "Well- If you've got nothing to hide. . ."
You are still giving up your rights whether you decide to deny it or not.
If they want to have a program where residents
sign up to have their houses searched because they're not sure of what their kids are up to
then that's a whole different story.
God forbid- But what's gonna happen if they enter a dwelling someday, some kid pulls out a glock and they gun him down right in his own bedroom?
Think there will be any prosecuting going on in that instance?
Don't get me wrong- The intent is good, but the protocol needs to be tweaked. This is a Pandora's box IMHO.
2PacSade-
spelling
[edit on 23-11-2007 by 2PacSade]
[edit on 23-11-2007 by 2PacSade]