posted on Feb, 13 2004 @ 09:01 PM
First, evidence if a "Shadow Government" is clear. If the Prez lies outright to the country and gets caught (as mr Bush has) doesn't that give you
a hint that "Something must be hiding in the shadows" or something is being covered up? And what publicly logical explanaition would there be for
it? Our government takes care of us, we make up the government. We can vote on laws and such... why would they want to screw us like that? No, from a
public view it must just be another one of those made-up conspiracies!
Anyone read an article about the government using robots.txt to block search queries? I thought it was possibly on WIRED, but it's not. Please link
if I don't... have to go through my logs, probably. Anyways, look at the gov's robots.txt file and tell me they aren't trying to keep stuff from
us. This info is supposed to be made public, so they put it on a public server, and block search queries and have no links. Basically it is public
info, but hardly a way to get to it unless you know a specific address.
Also, if the government isn't acting as a 'shadow government' why all the quick accusations of Bin Laden when someone else stood up and said "I
DID IT!" and Bin Laden is denying it? You think someone just wants to get shot because he doesn't have the balls to do it himself? Accused
terrorists who supposedly sacraficed themselves to take out the WTC and Pentagon are magically alive and well. Nothing to be concerned over? A small
mistake? If you ask me, that was a HUGE mistake.
Also, there is LOTS of reason to believe that someone is implementing a NWO. American currency is readily being pushed as standard world trade monies.
American influence is everywhere, even in remote parts of the world. Amazingly enough, American English is readily the secondary language in alot
if not most countries in the world. Everything is being "American Standardized". This is easily tips the scales in favor of possible NWO and against
it being "just a crackhead conspiracy theory". Analyze all info possible using even basic philosophical argument and the evidence becomes even
Speaking of Philosophy (and to be more precise, bad philosophical argument) here's a good one concerning Godwin's Law: