It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chyort
The amount misinformation, bad information and ignorance of this thread is amazing.
Originally posted by RogerT
And you are still not listening.
Originally posted by zerotime
No one is going to rise up because the vast majority already vaccinated their children. We are talking about a very small percentage that have not or will not vaccinate.
I don't believe their vaccinations are a good thing but maybe for a different reason than most of you. First, they are vaccinating for Chicken Pox. This is a bad idea imo. The chicken pox vaccination does not work very well. My wife works at Childrens Hospital in Columbus OH. Vaccinated kids are coming in with the chicken pox all the time. A few of our family members had vaccinated children get the chicken pox. The bad part is that usually those kids who get the chicken pox after being vaccinated do not get a bad case of the chicken pox. At first that seems like a good thing, however, the problem is that if you did not get a strong case of the chicken pox the first time then you can get them again. And if you happen to get them as an adult the disease can kill you. It is much better to just get the chicken pox as a child and build up an immunity to it.
Forced vaccinations are wrong. However, if you choose not to vaccinate and thus put other people at risk then I think those people at risk from you should know about or be protected from you. If that means un vaccinated kids can't go to school then so be it.
Smallpox was the first disease people tried to prevent by purposely inoculating themselves with other types of infections:
Smallpox inoculation was started in India or China before 200 BC. In 1718, Lady Mary Wortley Montague reported that the Turks have a habit of deliberately inoculating themselves with fluid taken from mild cases of smallpox and she inoculated her own children.
Before Edward Jenner tested the possibility of using the cowpox vaccine as an immunisation for smallpox in humans in 1796 for the first time, at least six people have done the same several years earlier: a person whose identity is unknown, England, (about 1771), Mrs. Sevel, Germany (about 1772), Mr. Jensen, Germany (about 1770), Benjamin Jesty, England, in 1774, Mrs. Rendall, England (about 1782)and Peter Plett, Germany, in 1791. In 1796 Edward Jenner inoculated using cowpox (a mild relative of the deadly smallpox virus). Pasteur and others built on this.
1853 law required universal vaccination against smallpox in England and Wales, with fines levied on people who did not comply. In the United States, the Supreme Court ruled in the 1905 case Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts that the state could require individuals to be vaccinated for the common good.
I didn't say I don't think it's credible because it is an "alternative" website. It's not credible because I have no idea where it gets its information from. Again, would you use this on a college paper?
I have no idea about this, maybe you could point me in the right direction.
Although I will say this: If the pharmacutical companies want to make billions, why have vaccinations at all? Why not just sell the more expensive medicine after you get sick?
I don't see where they used CDC as a source.
I could say I've been to places like South America or the Middle East where I've seen what happens to people when they haven't been vaccinated. It doesn't really matter though.
No, I don't have kids, why that matters I don't know, but I do volunteer at a children's hospital. I'm glad they have recieved their vaccinations.
Hehe, I'm sure finding that one website would entail quite a bit of work.
Here's part of an article detailing the sucess of the small pox vaccine. Near the bottom is probably the information you are looking for:
Article
Here's one about measles:
Measles
The annual number of reported measles cases in the United States has declined from between 3 million and 4 million in the prevaccine era to
Originally posted by Chyort
I know this might be surprising, but some good information about vaccinations is not available on the internet. I would recommend visiting a college library and going to the medical section if you want some more information.
Originally posted by johnsky
Exercise is also good for you...
should we be setting up exercise camps and arresting anyone who doesn't want to run on a treadmill for 3 hours a day?
OR better yet, lets arrest anyone who is not getting their daily recommended dose of bread, milk, fruit and vegetables!
Come on RogerT, we DON'T CARE if it's proven safe... it's been FORCED on the public.
This is FASCISM!
Originally posted by Chyort
reply to post by RogerT
Wow, a ton of posts while I was making my post. I didn't see those other two posts you made so I'll address them quick:
The measles outbreak in Texas? I don't know where you got that information, but it sounds like the outbreak came from poor areas that had not been vaccinated
We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.
Originally posted by Chyort
The other post you made, all you did was give me info from another site that is not credible. Whale.to? Are you serious? Have you read their mission statement? C'mon bro, I give you good sources and this is what I get in return?
Then you add some quotes but don't put where you got them from. Are you just taking out little bits and pieces to forward your argument? Why not post the source?
Originally posted by Chyort
Un-vaccinated world? Well, I guess that the U.S., World Health Organization, and other organizations sending doctors, nurses and voluteers out to vaccinate third world countries never happened.
The amount misinformation, bad information and ignorance of this thread is amazing.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Originally posted by RogerT
And you are still not listening.
I'm sure he heard you. But he's probably not convinced by your argument, as am I.
Are you unaware of how the immune system works? Or are you simply trying to jam a square peg into a round hole to fit your beliefs?
Originally posted by malcr
Personally I quite enjoy the total ignorance on this thread about vaccines and the absolutely insane arrogance that "my kid ain't got that poisin in them and they're good clean kids".
Originally posted by RogerT
..
i can't believe you got a star for that!
Originally posted by RogerT
Well good morning Chyort
I've got a few minutes, so will respond to your posts. It seems you don't have much interest in learning an alternative view about this topic, but for the sake of others who may wish to, I'd like to counter the misinformation you are posting.
That would surely be another waste of time, given the scant effort you put into my other recommendations.
It's much more lucrative to sell the overpriced and mostly useless vaccines to a captive market which is legislated to buy your product, and then also sell them the overpriced and mostly useless drugs when they still get sick.
Well are you saying it or aren't you?
I could say that you are lying, or talking out of your rear end? It doesn't really matter though. Even if you have been there in any capacity beyond tourist, how are you so certain that what you are seeing is a result of not vaccinating, rather than a hundred other reasons (sanitation, nutrition, basic health care, clean water)
Here's another article from the Idaho journal as a little food for thought:
www.proliberty.com...
It would be nice to get some compelling evidence, rather than the junk you posted so far.