handgun?, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 02:41 AM by PaddyInf
Originally posted by Nailer
I have owned both .45 and 9mm and will take a .45 acp anyday over the 9mm. If you want stopping power the 45 has it


That is completely your choice, and a good one at that. However not everyone can handle a .45, and they do have a couple of disadvantages. For example a .45 pistol will be larger and have more recoil than a 9mm equivalent. This makes it harder to conceal and more difficult to make rapid follow up shots with. This is very important in a handgun shooting, as no pistol round can reliably knock down a human target with a single bullet. That is a simple fact.

The 1911 .45ACP can take severe punishment and still fire accurately. The original test for the military , buried the gun in mud for x amount of days and when they dug it up ,wiped it off and fired every round in the clip.


So what? This is entirely possible with many handguns available these days. The torture tests that many modern pistols are put through are staggering. Take a look at the Glock reliability test for the Australian Army. They were running over the pistol with trucks and all sorts, and the weapon still fired.

You keep advocating the 1911, but do you realy think that the single action pistol is best for concealed carry for most people? Single action carry requires considerably more training to carry concealed than a DA or DAO weapon. You can either carry it cocked with the safety on, hammer down on a loaded chamber or with an empty chamber. All of these require extra fine motor movements to bring the weapon into play - not easy in a high stress confrontation. You could carry the pistol made ready with the safety off, but this is not advisable with a light single action trigger.

many agencies /law enforcement/Government are slowly going back to the 45 ACP becuase of the accuracy and stopping power of the round.


Firing a .45 quickly and accurately generally requires more practice than a 9mm or .40. These agencies have plenty of time that they can dedicate to handgun practice. Joe Bloggs with wife, kids, mortgage and full-time job generally does not. I know that we all say "practice as much as possible", but when you have a house full of commitments, unfortunately handgun practice is limited to a few rounds in the range every few weeks if your lucky. This is far from ideal, but it is real life. Johny Cop has access to more range time and expert tuition than most of us.

Also law enforcement agencies tend to put the concealability factor further down the list than most of us. A .45 is larger than a 9mm of equal capacity.

The 9mm round is a high velocity round and does not have the impact force of the 45.


The "impact force" of a pistol round is puny. Isac Newton prooved this over 250 years ago. Don't take my word for it, take the FBIs' Ballistics labs' word.

Goddard amply proves the fallacy of "knock-down power" by calculating the heights (and resultant velocities) from which a one pound weight and a ten pound weight must be dropped to equal the momentum of 9mm and .45ACP projectiles at muzzle velocities, respectively. The results are revealing. In order to equal the impact of a 9mm bullet at its muzzle velocity, a one pound weight must be dropped from a height of 5.96 feet, achieving a velocity of 19.6 fps. To equal the impact of a .45ACP bullet, the one pound weight needs a velocity of 27.1 fps and must be dropped from a height of 11.4 feet. A ten pound weight equals the impact of a 9mm bullet when dropped from a height of 0.72 inches (velocity attained is 1.96 fps), and equals the impact of a .45 when dropped from 1.37 inches (achieving a velocity of 2.71 fps).


Link


I feel that I need to edit this after reading. I don't want to come across as anti - .45ACP. I'm not. I believe that it is an excellent defensive round, and that it offers several advantages over 9mm, the most useful of which being that it simply makes a bigger hole.

My point is that I would rather carry a 9mm or a .40. I know that I can fire a 9mm quickly, planting 3 accurate shots centre mass in under a second at 7 metres. From the holster I can do this under 2 seconds. This took a lot ot training. With a .45 it would take longer simply due to the recoil. If you can do this with a .45 then well done. Most people can't.

Carry what you can shoot well and carry safely. If that's a 1911 then so be it.

[edit on 15-12-2007 by PaddyInf]



reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 04:31 AM by northwolf
reply to post by Damocles



First HK Pistol i would seriously consider is the new P30, every pistol before that has ergonomics that just dont fit me. But the P30 with its adjustable grip is just about perfect.

Another gun that might be good cor concealed carry is the Steyr A1, really slim grip and glock like safety. And the sights are good for fast shooting too.


reply posted on 15-12-2007 @ 11:08 AM by Retseh
Personally I find the recoil and blast of a .40 noticably less pleasant than a .45, the recoil of a .45 is quite tame (to me), which is to be expected because .45ACP is a low pressure round and the recoil impulse curve is much shallower than that of other major calibers.

.357SiG is by far the most intriguing (and unpleasant) round to shoot. The pressures generated are very high, and the sensation when shooting one indoors is that of being slapped on the forehead with each shot.

Police departments who have adopted this round have been seeing some dramatic results that they did not experience with either 9mm or the more powerful .40S&W loadings. This may be anecdotal, but one of the major Virginia PDs has even commented that the severity of injuries to extremeties (legs and arms) often causes immediate incapacitation. If I could afford the ammo in the volumes I would need it, and if I could handle the round to a level I would be comfortable with, all my guns would be chambered in .357SiG.

As it is, with the exception of my revered Springfield XD45 which I load with 185gr .45ACP +P (there's real recoil for you), I pretty much just go with hopped up 9mm loadings, of which there are none finer than 124gr +P Gold Dots and Winchester Ranger 127gr +P+.

As for choosing a platform from which to launch them, the single most important thing for someone making their first purchase is to find a gun that fits their hand. For example, for me personally, a Glock has an unnatural grip angle and an uncomfortable, blocky grip profile. Sig Sauers are just too big for me with the exception of the P232 and the P239. HK USP compacts fir me better than almost anything, and my new Beretta PX4 9mm G Model is a near perfect fit also.

Choose a size first and worry about manufacturer, caliber, and trigger group later, because if the gun doesn't fit your hand, you will never shoot it well.


reply posted on 16-12-2007 @ 02:09 AM by PaddyInf
Originally posted by Retseh
Personally I find the recoil and blast of a .40 noticably less pleasant than a .45, the recoil of a .45 is quite tame (to me), which is to be expected because .45ACP is a low pressure round and the recoil impulse curve is much shallower than that of other major calibers.


I've heard plenty of people state this about the .40 round. My experience of the .40 is limited, hence I advocate a 9mm. The .45 does recoil considerably more than the 9mm though, but it is more of a heavy push than the sharp snap of a 9mm.


As for choosing a platform from which to launch them, the single most important thing for someone making their first purchase is to find a gun that fits their hand. For example, for me personally, a Glock has an unnatural grip angle and an uncomfortable, blocky grip profile. Sig Sauers are just too big for me with the exception of the P232 and the P239. HK USP compacts fir me better than almost anything, and my new Beretta PX4 9mm G Model is a near perfect fit also.

Choose a size first and worry about manufacturer, caliber, and trigger group later, because if the gun doesn't fit your hand, you will never shoot it well.


Precisely. A few of the lads I worked with carried Glock 19s or 17s and they suited my grip angle nicely, more so than the Walther P5C I normally carried off-duty or the Browning we carry on ops. The Glock brought my hand nearer the bore (I shoot with the Weaver stance when I can and European grip - supporting hand index finger around the trigger guard), so I could control recoil more and fire faster. I've got quite big hands (strange considering I'm only 5'7" tall), so large grips are more natural for me. I also liked the 226, even though the angle was shallower than the Glock.

Everyones' hands are different, and the only way to find a shooter that fits your hand is to get hold of a few.


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 04:50 AM by Damocles
reply to post by PaddyInf




well the concealability of it is secondary to me personally. i carried my full framed USP quite comfortably for years. but yeah, sigs in my top 3 as well, but my top preference for any handgun is the usp40. i was really unhappy when i had to sell mine (i always tell people guns are an investment. so long as you take care of them its easy to sell them when youre down on yer luck and need to eat)

if my buddy was getting an HK dealership agreement id so totally go for another usp40. sig p228 is my close second choice, and im going with the 9mm version just becuase it is less recoil than the 40 and i want one my wife can handle with ease as well. she's got small hands and wrists so until they fix me and i can rock climb again, and take her out so her wrists gain more strength, the 9mm is a good choice for me for right now.

given where we live and so forth normally i wouldnt even worry about owning a handgun, but in 3 weeks im going to go and finish building a prototype i started last christmas season (its a pain when you live 1500 miles from your brother who has a shop and all the tools you need lol) and the really paranoid part of me thinks that should the prototype work, a bit extra security wouldnt be a bad idea at all for now. (if it works im really going to piss opec off)

but im babbling. HK Sig then believe it or not beretta is my 3rd choice. used the M9 on my last duty assignment in the army and qual'd expert with it. im not a huge glock fan, i really like the external hammer and having a safety switch is a nice thing for me. i do know of a guy who had his glock in the small of his back, went to draw it and like a moron put his finger on the trigger and ended up adding a new hole in his rear. yeah sure you can do that with any DA pistol, but having the thumbswitch safety cuts the risk.

thats another reason i like the HK's and the Sigs, the switches are all on the lower frame and easy to reach with your thumb without changing your grip much if at all ( i have smallish hands so sometimes i need to adjust my grip slightly ) vs the beretta where the decocker/safety is on the slide. not a huge fan of that but its something i could live with if i got the right price on a 92.

id eventually like to get my wife a ppk or some other similar sized pistol, but i found that the recoil on them was just enough to make the size not worth the tradeoff. i could handle rapid firing with it but im not sure she could just yet

and lets face it, a full framed pistol is more of a visual deterrent to most people on teh wrong end of it. theres the perception that a smaller pistol isnt as dangerous so a fullframed pistol may negate the need to even fire it. (which is why a short barreled 12g is so nice, nothing else sounds like a gauge being pumped and thats usually all it takes lol. for that i like the winchester 1300 defender model )

just my thoughts.


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 11:07 AM by Damocles
reply to post by blueyedevil666



LOL no thanks, i use a 4' walking stick to get around, one club in my hands is enough.



reply posted on 8-2-2008 @ 05:57 PM by Damocles
reply to post by Retseh



well, while i do see your point, i myself tend to carry in the smal of my back as well (no im not the guy who perforated himself with the glock lol) i find it just to be a little more discrete in social situations as its not obvious im carrying a pistol to begin with and as i rarely wear a jacket my shirt covers it more effectivly than it would on my hip.

yes, to draw from there requires a little more motion, but like any draw, its a matter of practicing it. if the extra half a second it takes me to draw my pistol compared to someone else pulling off their hip is the difference between a conversation with the police and a conversation with god, then i was most likely boned anyway.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags
America\'s Next Bomber: Unmanned, Unlimited Range, Aimed At China
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags