Really? How does he know this? He doesn't. He's using his no-planer "common sense"and nothing that actually involves real physics.
I'm still wondering why, if the aircraft damage to the WTC was so obviously impossible, there are no credible experts disputing it. It's not even debated among professionals in the field.
Seems like he's offering to replace the steel plow used in the Mythbusters vid with a section of wing, and replace the car with a section of steel boxes and spandrel plate built to the specifications of the WTC.
And as far as credible experts, my money's on Newton.