It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by MikeVet
Could you please show us all those videos of all fires in either tower? The biggest fire I noted, in any videos or photos, was the one on the outside of the north tower. It quickly disappeared leaving massive clouds of oxygen starved carbon smoke making it extremely difficult to view the inside of either tower.
1. Please repost because i must have missed the links and sites posted by you.
2. So either the sites i quoted lied about the smoke meaning oxygen starved fires or not. Which is it?
3. It has to do with the fact of oxygen getting to the supposed fires in the debris field.
Originally posted by OrionStars
I know what O2 is.
However, we are not utilizing O2 in atmospheric air nor is fire.
Both utilize O not O2. O2 is not safe to breathe nor is O3 (ozone).
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by MikeVet
Any more?
Originally posted by OrionStars
Is that right? Well, perhaps, some people need anatomy and physiology 101, plus, basic physics and chemistry101 remedial version, based on many of their comments regarding anything related to science.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Under normal atmospheric conditions in fire, the heat is unbonding oxygen from other gases in the atmosphere. Think the evaporation process of unbonding two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen.
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by buddhasystem
You were unaware that molecules not bonded are considered unbonded. Or do you prefer the word unbound instead?