It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Atlantis' exclusion from Ancient Maps

page: 5
2
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 22 2009 @ 09:50 PM
link   
reply to post by dooper
 


Howdy Dooper

Your attempts to divert from the subjects have been manifest but they have failed.

1. Please explain how the actions you describe to scientists are not a conspiracy?

2. Please explain how the actions you describe to scientists are not evil?

3. Explain your claim to be involved in overturning the 2nd law, are you a scientist or just a janitor or clerical assistant. I have to ask but you seem to have no idea how science works.

4. Explain how you saw maps that you think show the antarctic.

5. Why are you refusing an offer of one dollar? You never did explained what you offering 100,000 for exactly - which is odd since you said it was super secret yet you want to send it to someone who could evaluate it for being capable of being real - who would then know your secret. Why someone who says they have a secret would talk about it on a public forum is a bit odd too. Why is that?

6. By all appearances you seem to be acting like a kook, please note I'm not calling you a kook, I'm saying you are acting like one.

Lets see if you can come back with anything coherent. Or shall we cue the music for, "bring in the clowns".

LOL




posted on Jan, 22 2009 @ 11:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Hanslune
 


Normally, narrow-minded, arrogant blowhards are ignored by me, but you bring the art to an entirely new level.

No use in responding to you, hell, you are the expert!

No secret technology. Your terminology, your claim. Not mine.

Nice trick.

I simply explained that a violation of the second law of thermodynamics was certified by a large forensic lab.

You said you wanted proof. The implication was that my claim was false.

My response was to provide a meaningful, AND rewarding exercise for one of us.

Third party holds the funds.

Your doubt and $100,000.

Against:

Laboratory certified results verifying violation of second law of thermodynamics, and my $100,000.

It's simple. You're so absolutely certain that I'm wrong. Then put your money where your mouth is.

I'm not worried about you getting the test results. It still won't tell you all the process. So it's not as though there's anything we want to conceal from you. Genius that you are!

And buddy, I won't get my ass out of bed for a measly dollar. Come on, you are so certain I'm wrong. You're so certain that you're right.

You can pick up an easy $100,000 here!

Don't let anything but fear or self-doubt stop you.

After all, you're the great scientist, rooted deeply in the scientific method. You can't possibly lose!

But you know what?

That white stuff in chiken$chitt? It's chiken$chitt too!



posted on Jan, 23 2009 @ 12:40 AM
link   


No use in responding to you, hell, you are the expert!


Hans: nope I just asking questions-which you never answer and to avoid answering these you keep going on about your bet. My return offer is 1 dollar. You offered the challenge I get to set the terms of duel. See the rules of dueling guy. 1 dollar.



No secret technology. Your terminology, your claim. Not mine.
I simply explained that a violation of the second law of thermodynamics was certified by a large forensic lab.


Hans: So if it isn't secret why can't you just tell us about it, you seem to be contradicting yourself....What you said




Six years ago, our small team violated, and I mean really violated classical physics, specifically the second law of thermodynamics, had our results independently verified, certified, and signed by a well-known forensics laboratory that major Universities use. This lab signed a non-disclosure agreement, and has done well by it.


Hans: So what was your role with this team - or is that secret too, LOL. Wait a minute if you are on such a team you must have an outstanding background in ....what exactly?



You said you wanted proof. The implication was that my claim was false.


Hans: Any claim can be challenged and in this case your demonstrated lack of knowledge about science made me skeptical of YOU being part of a small team, not the use of the term, “our”. Someone who reacts like you do to a challenge on a claim shouldn't be on a public board. Is this what you do everytime someone asks you a question? LOL



My response was to provide a meaningful, AND rewarding exercise for one of us.


Hans: No your silly challenge was to try and get out of an impossible position, we were talking about maps, steady state geology and your poor understanding of science. To avoid those you came up with this nonsense -which makes it clear your lack of knowledge or ability to debate.



Laboratory certified results verifying violation of second law of thermodynamics, and my $100,000.




It's simple. You're so absolutely certain that I'm wrong.


Hans:Never said that I was 'absolutely certain' that you were wrong I was asking for evidence that it is true. Your response was to go nutty.



Then put your money where your mouth is.


Hans: based on what? Remember you cannot even tell us what you did yet you want us to make a determination of whether it is true or not …..that isn’t exactly the reasoning of a normal person. By the way you'll have to prove first of all that you have 100,000...LOL



I'm not worried about you getting the test results. It still won't tell you all the process.


Hans: The provide it as you are stating above that it isn't secret and can be shared. You do know you are contradicting yourself? If the information is free to be transmitted why not do so? Or are you incapable of doing that? Why won't you do that?

Because in my opinion you’ve made it up. Now can I prove that? Nope, because you refuse to provide information on which to base an evidenced opinion but based on your comments about science I believe you to have no ability to have been on such a team. Why I would have to pay for that evidence is beyond me.



Genius that you are!


Hans: Why thanks but no genius here just asking questions - and watching a fringe believer wandering around trying to get himself out from under a unsupportable claim.



And buddy, I won't get my ass out of bed for a measly dollar. Come on, you are so certain I'm wrong.


Hans: See above, try to THINK about what you are doing



After all, you're the great scientist, rooted deeply in the scientific method. You can't possibly lose!


Hans: Sure you could be right but then why aren’t uyou providing any information on which to base a decision.

So do you have anything to say about ancient maps - or do you intent to run around demanding money to prove your claim?

LOL



new topics
 
2
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join