 |
|
Topic started on 16-11-2007 @ 04:15 PM by AcesInTheHole
|
Inflatable Moon Base Prototype Heads to South Pole
news.yahoo.com
 Toups said the field demonstration will show that the structure can be "packaged in a small volume" but still "expand to a usable, habitable
volume," even in an extreme environment. If NASA likes what it sees, a second or third generation inflatable habitat could deploy to the moon as early
as 2020, with four-person crews making weeklong trips to get a lunar base operational. (visit the link for the full news article)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 04:15 PM by AcesInTheHole
|
This sounds like a big step towards getting bases on the moon. I guess after a few of these get set up, they would have enough people to start
constructing permanent bases on the moon, mars, etc.
They say that inflating these only takes about 10 minutes, and they are testing it in Antarctica. Wearing all that bulky cold weather gear will also
help simulate the troubles faced by astronauts in their bulky spacesuits. Private space companies are looking into this design as well.
news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 04:21 PM by PrplHrt
|
Am I the only person here who thinks this is just a little strange? Why would you test a prototype in one of the most inaccessible areas of the planet
when you can perform the same tests in the continental US?
I'm sure this is costing the American taxpayer a fortune.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 04:23 PM by groingrinder
|
As early as 2020? I thought we had already been there. It should be easier to go now than 1969. I really like the inflatable
habitat and believe it will have applications here as portable medical centers and survival housing.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 04:31 PM by AcesInTheHole
|
reply to post by PrplHrt
Here's what the article says-
 NASA and the National Science Foundation hope to learn how the habitat material behaves in a cold environment and how well the structure retains
heat and atmosphere.
Isn't the moon extremely cold at night(-170 C) ? Seems logical they would want to test it in a similar environment. I don't know how they would
simulate daytime temperatures on the moon though, I believe it can be as hot as 100 degrees celsius during the day.
[edit on 11/16/07 by AcesInTheHole]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 04:39 PM by PrplHrt
|
reply to post by AcesInTheHole
Right, I understand the need to test it in extreme environments. We have test facilities that simulate these conditions. I've read about them in
other articles over the years.
It costs a fortune to transport anything to the SP. I'm sure it would be cheaper in a lab environment. Of course, I don't ever want to deprive
anyone of an adventure due to the expense incurred by the people who pay for it.
Silly me.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 04:47 PM by AcesInTheHole
|
Originally posted by PrplHrt
reply to post by AcesInTheHole
Right, I understand the need to test it in extreme environments. We have test facilities that simulate these conditions. I've read about them in
other articles over the years. 
Links? The only lunar surface simulator I saw was on this site, and it sure isn't big enough to house 4 people...
www.grc.nasa.gov...
 Features:
61-cm-diameter- by 76.2-cm-long cylindrical vacuum chamber.
10-6-torr base operating pressure.
Dust transported and dispersed in vacuum facility without danger to vacuum pumping.
Sufficient ports available for instrumentation, plumbing, LN2, and solar radiation source addition.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 04:57 PM by PrplHrt
|
I've only read about these facilities in old magazine articles. I believe the topic was testing metals at extreme temperatures.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 05:02 PM by AcesInTheHole
|
reply to post by PrplHrt
Those are way too small to test on a living evironment made for 4 people. They want to test it's functionallity(how it holds heat, atmosphere), not
if the materials will "hold up." I'm sure they know by now what materials they can and cannot use when building these.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 05:08 PM by PrplHrt
|
reply to post by AcesInTheHole
The test facility I saw in the photo was the size of a hanger. That isn't big enough?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 05:33 PM by AcesInTheHole
|
reply to post by PrplHrt
This is ATS. Your just going to have to come up with more evidence instead of saying 'I done seen stuff like dat before...'
I really don't see your angle here other than trying to derail this thread.
[edit on 11/16/07 by AcesInTheHole]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 07:14 PM by PrplHrt
|
reply to post by AcesInTheHole
I can do without the sarcasm. I'm not trying to derail the thread. I read an article about testing metals in extreme temperatures. The photo
accompanying the article was of a hanger-sized lab that can be made either extremely hot or extremely cold.
I'm sorry I don't have proof. In fact, I'm sorry I mentioned it at all.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 07:23 PM by Solarskye
|
That's very cool AcesInTheHole, no pun intended. This seems like a good idea but I'm just wondering since there's so many craters on the moon that
these inflatables would be popped like a balloon from just one piece of dust traveling at thousands of miles an hour. It did say something in the
video about covering them with moon soil to protect from radiation, but would that really protect them? Seems with all the technologies of today that
we could come up with something better to spray on the inflatables or make them out of material that is able to deflect radiation.
I mean you got galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events that would definetly go through one of those inflatables. But I'm sure or I hope the
take into consideration for radiation exposure and come up with a solution. For me, I'd be afraid of being in one of those things on the moon, but I
guess that's why I never became an astronaut.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 07:34 PM by AcesInTheHole
|
reply to post by Solarskye
I'm not sure, the article doesn't talk about particulate breaking through, but it does talk about the solar rays, radiation, and temperatures. But
according to this, a few of the modules are in earth orbit at the moment in hopes of setting up a new space station by 2012. Whether or not they are
inflated at this moment is not mentioned though. These ones are owned by private companies.
[edit on 11/16/07 by AcesInTheHole]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 07:56 PM by Solarskye
|
I found this on Wikipedia. So maybe it can work.
Inflatable Habitat
Hey as long as we can dream it then we can do it. I'll keep updated on this for sure. Thanks for the info Ace.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-11-2007 @ 08:41 PM by anhinga
|
Also, China has plans on a Moon base too but it appears, they're have some problems w/ that.
 “[A] Moon landing needs a rocket with 3,000 to 4,000 tons of thrust,” Xinhua quoted him as saying. “But the most power thrust carrier rocket
is at around 600 tons.”
www.space.com...
www.space.com...
blogs.nature.com...
[edit on 16-11-2007 by anhinga]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |