For the sake of logic, just tell me where the plane was, one second before arriving at or above the Pentagon wall.

I am not as much interested in what happened after that, anymore.

I want to know if the North of Citgo flightpath is a viable and logic conclusion after CIT brought forth their interviewed witnesses, and their, supporting to the NoC flightpath, parts of interviews of publicized witnesses from the past.

Lets try to stop the immature bickering-ad-infinitum for the moment, and try to concentrate on the facts offered by CIT.

I have studied the Citgo video for months now, and I can't visualize the position of sergeant Lagasse, compared to his car, while pumping gas.

1. Was he holding the gas-handle, or did he left it in to automatically stop when full?
2. Was he standing between the pump-housing and the car?
3. Or was he sitting in the passenger seat, talking on the radio?
4. Did he turn his body and/or head to the North when the plane passed?

All this occurring, when the famous "flash" from the parked police car was to be observed at 4:44 in the Citgo video.

The parked police car sped away directly after or at the flash occurrence.
Also all inhabitants of the Citgo building itself, ran off to the entrance/exit to the east side, directly after the flash occurred.

To my opinion, there is a glass window in the building's North wall, where the man behind the cash register in the left bottom video window (obscured by the FBI) turned his head to when we see the flash, and directly after that he runs off to the East entrance, while we see him pass first through the other, right bottom video window of the other cashiers boot.

If we can get an unobstructed Citgo video, clearly indicating the head movements of all visitors and cashiers in the Citgo building when the flash occurred at 4:44, we can lay this endless controversy to rest, at last.

I predict you will not obtain via FOIA requests a de-blurred version, because of the ridiculous reason given by the FBI (= government) for some Citgo inhabitants privacy concerns.
This in itself already indicates a cover-up.
And spare us the usual Justice-for-All arguments, we really are getting fed up with all that jurisdictional ant-fornicating, flourishing in the USA.

This is THE MOST IMPORTANT video evidence of the Pentagon attack, especially regarding the fact that we have been shown just three up till now :
1. the 2 parking boot videos
2. the Citgo video
3. the Double Tree hotel video.

When we clearly can see the reactions of all people around the 4:44 moment in the Citgo video, we will be sure where the plane flew.

Body language is undeniable proof.

And I personally strongly expect sergeant Lagasse's eyewitness account of a NoC flightpath taped by CIT be fully proved, by the body language of all visible people in an un-obscured Citgo video.

You realize of course, that if a North of Citgo flightpath is to be 100% proved, we will be heading to impeachment procedures for more than one individual.

That's why it will be near to impossible to obtain that un-obscured video during these peoples watch.

You don't have to rely on Robert Turcios and William Lagasse.

ALL witnesses who were in a position to tell put the plane on the north side of CITGO and/or Columbia Pike!

Paik, Morin, Brooks, Boger, & Stephens ALSO corroborate Lagasse and Turcios!

How much independent confirmation do you need to question what the government tells you?

If the plane was on the south side ONE of them or SOMEBODY would be able to explain this.

If the plane was on the south side SOMEBODY would have seen the pole spear the windshield of the taxicab or the cab screech to a sideways stop on the road with a light pole sticking out over the hood.

As LabTop points out the implications of this evidence are clear so to suggest that the government controlled, provided, and manipulated security video that was released within days of the first north side claim announcement is valid evidence to prove their innocence demonstrates a clear confirmation bias and a pure desire to accept what the government tells you over independent evidence that proves their story false.

It's all really quite simple.

This is why certain people work over time to convolute and spin the information as a means to confuse people and defend their faith in the government story.