posted on Nov, 20 2007 @ 10:17 AM
Lauren, I would be surprised if it was a helicopter because I just can't wrap my mind around not finding any kind of evidence in an image editor of
that object that indicates this is what it is regardless that it may be an abbreviated long exposure. One would think that something would show up in
and around that object when it's embossed or lightened up or whatever... but nothing is there other than what we already see in those photo's.
But I'm learning more now about long exposure photographs and what some of the new cams are capable of but nevertheless, whatever that object is
identified as, IMHO, it still may be inconclusive but I'm only basing this on my limited understanding of long exposure photo's at the present
This said, it does sound like we can rule out planes.. I think. Just going by what's being said so far about that but JR's a real whiz about
analyzing photo's like this so it will be interesting to see what he finds.
Oh, btw... that's hilarious that Grant took 100 photo's of ONE BUTTERFLY!!
Hmmmm, he sounds a little on the obsessive side..lol. But on the other hand, if this is the way he is, then he would be remembering if he saw that
object up there or not when he was taking those photo's.
He definitely must be very intelligent though to master an advanced cam like that so soon... he's a born photographer.. that's very evident. Some
people have it in their blood. I know someone like that and it seems like Grant is like that too!
[edit on 20-11-2007 by Palasheea]