posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 07:05 PM
Lets put this to bed...
Ron Paul’s views are a contradictory hodgepodge of conservative and libertarian positions.
If you look at the libertarian party it does have a lot of conservative views and if anything that party can heavily lean in that direction much more
than towards democrat views, so I have no clue what he is getting at with this statement and I find it rather ignorant.
He opposed the Iraq War but supported Afghanistan.
Ok, is there a single person on ATS that has a problem with a person who supports the Afghanistan effort but is against the Iraq War? .....I hear
crickets chirping…another rather, ok I’ll say it...stupid remark.
He’s strongly pro-life but vaguely pro-gay-marriage.
Hell, I'm pro life and anti-gay marrige...so I'm not sure what the reporter's point is here for I'm sure there are pro choice and pro gay marrige
and vice-a-versa. They do not have anything in common other than maybe religion which is pro-life and anti-gay which is not why I am the way I am.
This is another stupid statement by the reporter...
It seems that he wants to withdraw from most international organizations, including the WTO and the U.N. Despite being “free trade,” he
opposes NAFTA, CAFTA and every other free trade agreement the U.S. has signed.
He is anti-tax, anti-government spending and wishes to return to the gold standard.
Jesus dude have you ever heard of a Constitutionalist? I'm heading from annoyed to wanting to kick this guy’s A$$
Ok maybe I'm kidding, but this guy has no clue to what he is talking about and is a perfect example of the Darwin theory not able to do it stuff.
BTW SimiusDei you need to take me off your foe list for we just agreed on something...
[edit on 14-11-2007 by Xtrozero]