It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Parents Must Immunize Their Children Or Go To Jail

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in


posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 12:41 PM

Fox news right now!

Mark Century
Wednesday November 14, 2007

Prince Georges County, MD

1,600 school children and their parents have been ordered to appear in circuit court this Saturday where health workers will immediately force them to receive required shots. Parents who don't bring their children to court for the shots are to be jailed.
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 14-11-2007 by jaywoo]

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 12:41 PM
I want the families of ATS to see this and comment. I do not take the Flu shots nor do my children. We are not frail creatures in need of this yearly cocktail of heebies.
(visit the link for the full news article)

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 12:47 PM
The logic of forced vaccinations never made any sense to me.

The un-vaccinated kids are no threat to the vaccinated kids so what's the big deal in letting people make that choice? If you don't vaccinate your kids then they are the ones who risk getting sick, not the other way around.

Everyone who is vaccinated is protected, even if the un-vaccinated ones cause the "spread of disease" (limited range and an arguable position to take), your still protected.

Forced vaccination must have another purpose/agenda behind it.


edit: grammar

[edit on 11/14/2007 by Gools]

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 12:52 PM
I was thinking that if the un-vaccinated kids got the flu, and it spread anyways, it would show the fallacy of the immunization. Something the machine doesn't want to risk.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 12:53 PM
Interesting. Wonder why they are forcing people to accept vaccination. Population control? Will they say a couple of years later that "oops, those vaccinations contained a unknown disease, sorry"?

I would not voluntarily take those shots.

We can do this the easy way or we can do this the hard way, but it's going to have to get done.

Gestapo all over again. When will you have had enough, America?

Approximately 4 million children in the U.S. are vaccinated each year. Of these, approximately 10,000 adverse reactions are reported to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. About 15 percent of these are serious enough to result in hospitalization, life-threatening illnesses, permanent neurological damage or death. There is even information emerging that vaccinations can make recipients more susceptible to developing cancer later in life.


The Bush Administration’s 2003 smallpox immunization program ultimately failed so completely that the CDC director even attempted to disavow its existence. The unnecessary deaths and illnesses that resulted from this ill-conceived plan should have served as a caution to those in government who seek to mandate unsafe vaccines to protect against hypothetical threats. Unfortunately, the BioShield II legislation indicates that government’s lesson learned was simply that it needed to operate in greater secrecy and to insure zero accountability – from pharmaceutical manufacturers or politicians – the next time.

Source: PDF

You think Homeland Security has nothing to do with this?

Some more papers about BioShield

[edit on 14-11-2007 by Copernicus]

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 01:30 PM

"formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, thimerosal, and polysorbate 80 (Tween-80)hydrolized gelatin, chick embryonic fluid, and human diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue" etc etc for a more indepth list of ingrediants please see above site! its quite horrible.
i have vaxed my sprogs for childhood illnesses.....however would never give them the flu vax, it seems to me an unnessasary yearly coctail. i have friends whom have oppted out of vax's altogether...and i must say i dont blame them. i think the us gov have to do some serious soul searching. can someone enlighten me is this stance (bush) a breach of civil rights?
m xx

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:00 PM
I don't get it, I've never got the flu vax in my entire life. I've never had the flu either, sometimes I get nasal infections though...but c'mon! Forced vaccinations!! Wake up, that's not legal at all.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:03 PM
Dont know how credible this site is but heres a relevant link

Propaganda Matrix

News networks and state authorities are once again engaging in mass public deception by claiming that vaccines for children are mandated by law and that parents will go to jail if kids do not take their shots. In reality, there is no law that says you have to vaccinate your children and waiver forms for personal or religious exemptions are freely available.

Bolding mine

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:03 PM
I was vacinated as a child. Im perfectly healthy as an adult. My daughter has been vaccinated, by my choice. She cant even get her ears pierced in a retail store unless she is vacinated. LOL

However, I do not think parents should be charged criminally if they dont.

Im not sure I get it though. If my child is vaccinated and goes to school and is around kids who arent. She is still protected and they are protected from her. Right?
So, it doesnt really bother me if some kids arent.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:19 PM

Originally posted by LordBaskettIV
c'mon! Forced vaccinations!! Wake up, that's not legal at all.

So, in one piece of federal legislation designed to address terrorism threats against the United States, federal health officials were given the power they had been seeking to force vaccination on citizens without informed consent and generally be held blameless for the vaccine-induced death or injury of any citizen. Understanding that public health and vaccine laws are under state control, in 1999 the Centers for Disease Control commissioned the drafting of model state legislation which would give broad new powers to public health officials. Known as the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA), this draft legislation would make it easy for public health officials to persuade Governors to declare a “public health emergency” and use the state militia, if necessary, to arrest, quarantine and forcibly vaccinate citizens, while those who make vaccines or enforce use of them would be exempt from liability for any vaccine deaths or injuries which occur. This draft legislation was immediately released post-September 11, 2001 and passed by nearly half the states by November 2002

Power grab by federal government

However, this is only legal when the government implements Martial Law. But since schools apparently say they have the right to vaccinate children, there must be some law saying they can, or they would not have the right to throw people in prison.

[edit on 14-11-2007 by Copernicus]

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:24 PM
Flu shots contain the harmful substance, mercury. I do not trust them, and will never had a flu shot for as long as I live.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:44 PM
It was funny after giving flu vaccine shots as well as the gamma globulins if you got a needle stick, how later on they started touting the shots as 'recominant vaccines' (i.e. not made from human or animal serums or components).

They were supposedly improved with no chance of contaimination.

Huh? Contamination?

They don't mention that before the recominant vaccines there were risks of unknown protein contaminants, which could include Mad Cow, and prions. Hardy-har-har. Yeah that's a riot.

Even now they don't tell you stuff about contamination - dirty equipments and soforth. For instance, did you know that it's impossible to completely sterilize the probes they use for colonoscopies because of the sensitive electronics? In one study, after completely dismantling some of the equipment they found traces of blood in them. Nice.

I never took the flu shots they offered and never had more than the minor head cold.

If you push they'll tell you the main reason they want you to be vaccinated is not because it will help you, but because it will reduce chances that others will get the virus spread to them. It's a 'good of the many over the good of the individual'. In the hospital, of course they're trying to limit the spread to the patients and could care less about any individual getting the flu.

2 cents.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 02:53 PM
I think that not all shots are bad, just some, like this flu one. The tetanus immunizations are something I couldn't live without, while I don't think I ever had immunizations for Hepatitis A. I contracted the Hep A virus, but I would prefer a few days of feeling down compared to a lifetime of half-effective shots.

The flu shot doesn't even work all that well, as the virus mutates all the time. The shots are only good for about a year. And all that stuff that happened with Chiron Corporation in 2004, the main manufacturer of flu vaccine, makes me suss. How the Food and Drug Administration covered for the company after it found sub-standard quality control and serious bacterial contamination at the manufacturing plant.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 03:10 PM
If this is state of affairs in the States then I am glad I live where I do!

They (the gubbermint) here had a mass advertising campaign for menegitis vaccinations a couple of years ago. Is was 'targeted, mainly at our lower socio-economic population. It was not 'forced' upon them though, ie, the parents would not go to jail for not immunizing their kids.

When I grew up we were encouraged to go and play in the dirt, if a kid on our street got chicken pox of mumps we were all dragged to the kids house to 'catch it'. That way our own immunization system could be at optimum performance. Wrapping kids in cotton wool and 'protecting' them from every little cough and cold lowers their resitance.

I thought you also might be interested in the following article:

read on down and particular the story from the New Zealand lady - any connections?? Read the part about Bayer and their history!!

edited: to get the link sorted!

[edit on 14-11-2007 by Havalon]

[edit on 14-11-2007 by Havalon]

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 03:17 PM
I agree and I have had the tetanus vaccination and the Recombivax Hep B series (since I handled donated blood).

However, don't forget that recently Bayer Corp. was outed as having dumped contaminated Factor 8 on the European communities that they could not sell in America. Government officials in France went to prison for agreeing to this and thousands of hemophiliacs (and family members) contracted HIV because of it. Bayer has not been held accountable for this.

My feeling is that if they are going to require these shots they should also handout documents detailing the degree and number of potential side effects. I think many parents who are toeing the line would rebel if they were fully informed of the risks and side effects. Make them publish these in the paper and have them posted in large print at the vaccination sites, along with having ample stocks of opt-out forms for personal or religious reasons.

If there were a 1 chance in 100 of contracting the disease and 1 chance in a million of having a side effect, then OK, but it should be published and freely available.

It still worries me, because it also involves a degree of 'trust' in big corporations not to screw it up and have contaminated the materials either knowingly or unknowingly. I'm sure they'd put profit ahead of safety (as Bayer did).

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 03:27 PM
If it were me, I would pack up my things and I would move. Thus placing myself in another jurisdiction.

That being said, I am shocked that to this playing out right here in the USA. I probably shouldnt be, but yet I am. I simply do not feel that the state has any right to tell me what I HAVE TO put in my body. Especially if it is of no consequence. Seriously...all this over a flu shot? I have never had a flu shot in my entire life, and I can not recall a single modern day case of death by influenza. So where is the public interest?

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 03:32 PM
reply to post by Copernicus

Thanks for the heads up, I wonder if these schools are using the same "laws" the IRS uses to enforce tax collections? Last I heard martial law was not in effect. Could the local law enforcement simply be in the dark here and doing it based on the word of the schools?

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 03:40 PM
Pull your child out of school and then claim a religious exemption. You can homeschool them. This is the worst kind of police state control imaginable. Why hasn't the autism epidemic struck the Amish? Well they don't vaccinate, (though they are more subject to rare genetic diseases because of a reduced gene pool).

I would personally view this as a lock and load issue. They are coming for your children and pumping them full of their biological experiments. In Africa the outbreak of AIDs closely follows the vaccine program and now third world doctors have caught them red handed sending contaminated vaccines.

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 03:45 PM
This is a lie there is no law that says you must take medical treatment

posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 03:49 PM
Thermasol is good for you. Mercury in a new label is good for you. I have some lead you should ingest did I say lead I meant Leadasol I renamed it now its good for you. The us Government loves. Take your shots.

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in