posted on Nov, 14 2007 @ 11:42 AM
I would encourage you to contact the professionals quoted as to their *actual* statements and opinions on the Meier case. Every one
I've contacted has said they're statements were taken out of context to the Meier advantage. Robert Post, one who's quoted as supporting the photo
analysis, stated that he never saw photos, nor negatives, only prints...and that he thought he might be dealing with a con-man.
Ken Dinwiddie of DeAnza Corporation, has stated in print that they were asked to alter photos to make them look more real.
As far as something you can read about the "photo analyst" Dilettoso (the author of the report) check this:
I've gone over this case time after time here, and dont care to really get into it again. I duplicated the photos using a small model, and challenged
the "representative" of the case to submit Meier's and mine to a 3rd party lab to test for fakery.
He has yet to do so, for going on 2 years. No excuse for why has been off the table, including massive personal attacks on me and several others
(hell, *any* others) who dont support Meier's case. To challenge this "case" and it's "evidence" it to incur the wrath of supporters...which as
I've said I wear as a badge of honor more then anything else.
I would encourage you to look deeper and do the due diligence of contacting named people yourself (ones outside the Elders, Stevens and Dilettoso -
who are the main proponents, and produced/wrote the videos/books for sale...sale being the operative word.)
Just be warned, the Meierites are highly venomous, and will abuse you for speaking out about their "prophet".
Anyway, thats all I have to say about it (i.e. no more replies forthcoming). Good luck to you.