I will not digg this story- but not because it lacks competence or credible pause. Like so many theories- there is much truth in it- however, I am not
letting our administration off the hook so easily and neither are the rest of the people.
Your article was brilliantly constructed and your theories carry an intelligent feasibility- yet again, the committal remains weak and several key
elements have been left out in the rain as if they did not matter- or, gracefully swept under the carpet by a charming and unassuming janitor with an
incredible grasp on the English language.
The PUT options on the airlines, the thermite, and the support beams which were found cut at the appropriate controlled demolition angles, and Larry
Silverstein's orders then careful "re-framing" of what he supposedly meant when he said THEY had decided to pull the building. The BBC reporting
the building WT-7 as having collapsed 7 minutes before it actually did. These facts cannot be dismissed, and they certainly were not addressed in your
eloquent theory.
There is another fact that has gone unchallenged- and it is usually dismissed and/or buried on the RARE event it is ever mentioned at all. This fact
is:
Not one of the airlines were downgraded to a DC-10- not one. Each airline will downgrade to a smaller plane when the passenger capacity is less than a
minimal percentage. Each airline had a passenger manifest with less than half of the required passengers to be profitable.
Many times when I flew on business- my scheduled flight was either moved to another gate at nearly the last minute (because a smaller plane was at
that gate) or the flight was delayed until a DC-10 arrived. When you travel a great deal for business- this is something that becomes more frequent
than not!
The most shocking part is that at times these planes have no choice but to fly at less capacity- but never do they fly 747, 757, or 767's at only 1/3
capacity- and if by a long shot this must occur this would be a RARE event- it certainly would not happen with all the planes as it DID on 9/11.
There is far too much information missing to be able to speculate of 9/11. But there certainly are enough unanswered questions to cause not only
alarm- but severe distrust- especially when comparing it to the "Official" report. Hence the nuts begin to draw their own conclusion based solely on
available evidence. Just like the JFK magic bullet theory which has been accepted as the "Official" account for his assassination- which is
bull#.
It saddens me to say that the available evidence is leading to some rather nefarious and reprehensible actions of our own administration.
The destruction of the WTC was actually necessary for many reasons. For one the WTC1-2 were condemned and were enormous money losers. It was actually
far cheaper to bring them down than it would have been to bring them up to code. WTC-7 being pulled was an afterthought which would protect many a
crook due to the nature of evidence (Such as Enron) was filed there. A happy coincidence? You know Enron private jets flew George Bush around during
his campaign!
3,000 people died that day. Those 3,000 innocent people also died horribly. And it is for those 3,000 innocent people- that we truthers will not rest
until they are honored with the truth. The powers that be shall perish in their ignorance and shall suffer for putting such a low price on the heads
of innocent working Americans.
The manipulations of war have little to do with 9/11- which was purely a financial decision which could also be milked for WAR value by support from
an unsuspecting and terrified public.
A public who now wants and deserves to know the truth. I wonder if anyone has the courage to speak it.
[edit on 14-11-2007 by dk3000]
[edit on 14-11-2007 by dk3000]
[edit on 14-11-2007 by dk3000]
[edit on 14-11-2007 by dk3000]


