It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kerkinana walsky
the nine layers of Mohenjodaro are what has been excavated already, there are not nine more layers still underneath. They are down to the untouched soil now.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by srsen
They ever look deeper at those possible ruins under the sea near Cuba?
Originally posted by kerkinana walsky
1. The pyramids are built on bedrock
2. scott creightons theory has more holes in it than a colander
3. Yonaguni is not 12,000 years old and has been dated by experts to the known Jomon culture. the only people claiming otherwise are all making money from it.
3. Edgar Cayce is not a valid source for information about anything.
[edit on 12-11-2007 by kerkinana walsky]
Originally posted by frumpwallow
the stubborn refusal to even acknowledge the possibility of previous lost civilizations is one of mt pet peeves as well. there is quite a lot of compelling evidence that there were civilizations prior to sumeria. unfortunately i have to admit none of it is definitive, but the amount of circumstantial evidence should be enough, in my opinion, to at least acknowledge the possibility.
Originally posted by frumpwallow
just the time scales (as currently accepted) is pretty compelling to me. its accepted that fully modern man (homo sapiens - and dont get me started on that homo sapiens sapiens garbage) has been around for around 200,000 to 500,000 years. and we expected to believe that modern humans, with our drive to explore and create, just dawdled around stupidly for hundreds of thousands of years until one day they up and decided "oh, hey, i know, lets become civilized!"? i dont find that very likely.
DNA evidence indicates that modern humans originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago
Science is based on the same kind of evidence that a court requires for a conviction.
Originally posted by srsen
1. Then how do you explain the myriad tunnels and chambers yet (officially) unexplored underneath the Giza complex?
Originally posted by srsen
It is suggested that the current pyramid is built on VERY ancient foundations. It has been said that an even older pyramid, which has since broken down over time, is literally under the Great Pyramid.
Originally posted by srsen
2. Have you put them to Scott? What did he say?
Originally posted by srsen
3. The land on which Yonaguni was built would have only been above sea level approx 12,000 years ago.
Originally posted by kerkinana walsky
If there had been a lost civilisation then there would be lots more evidence than there is. Civilisations do not exist in a vacuum.
Originally posted by kerkinana walsky
how many people make a civilisation ?
This "Hutchison Effect" has been claimed for years, without any independent verification — ever. In fact, its originator can't even replicate it on demand. This has been investigated more than once, been part of documentaries on The Discovery Channel, but still never seems to pass critical muster. This is in the category of folklore. In general, the "American Antigravity" web site caters to such folklore and its enthusiasts.
Originally posted by srsen
When was the last time you recall seeing earthquakes, tidal waves, meteor impacts and volcanoes all happening at once on earth? Obviously your answer is that you don’t.
Originally posted by srsen
If I understand you correctly then you are saying that there weren't enough people to populate these past civilisations - but I'm saying that all these people died. Some suggest Mu had upwards of 64 million inhabitants who mostly all perished.
I recommend a book that will give you an idea just how quickly a civilization can vanish especially if you add in if it was caused by some MAJOR catastrophy (yea I know I misspelled so shoot me).
This is the link to the website about it. I recommend you pick it up.
The World Without Us.
Originally posted by frumpwallow
its accepted that fully modern man (homo sapiens - and dont get me started on that homo sapiens sapiens garbage) has been around for around 200,000 to 500,000 years. and we expected to believe that modern humans, with our drive to explore and create, just dawdled around stupidly for hundreds of thousands of years until one day they up and decided "oh, hey, i know, lets become civilized!"? i dont find that very likely.