It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How the heck did our original civilisations in Babylon just start out of nowhere if not influenced by existing civilisations? How did they learn language, culture, arts and law? How did they just suddenly know how to do all this?
Originally posted by srsen
There is so much evidence out there which shows that man was around MUCH earlier than our current science suggests...
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
Even if there were ancient advanced civilizations, I've always thought they were destroyed by cataclysms and lost all or most of their knowledge. That's why during this current epic of history we started out as hunter/gatherers. Nearly everything was wiped out from the previous technological civilization, and we went back to square one.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
Can you to clarify your question ?
Are you asking for proof atlantis didn't exist, or proof that no other civilizations existed prior to the sumerians ?
please also define civilization
are you asking about civilizations with written language, or city states, or what ?
Originally posted by Nohup
Well, there's a lot of suggestive evidence, but just like with UFOs, there's nothing that is absolutely definitive and incontrovertible. There's always room for debate. There's always one expert's opinion that doesn't concur with another expert's opinion.
Originally posted by Nohup
I tend to think that professional archeologist have a bit of an advantage over folks who are armchair interpreters. I also think that if civilized man has been around a lot longer than people say, the evidence would be a lot more obvious and less subject to interpretation.
Originally posted by Nohup
…bunk and nonsense is exciting, and it's easy for your excitement about an idea to cloud your mind to the more mundane reality. Super civilizations like Atlantis are cool and exciting. Much more than the dull reality of a few boring mud hut cities in Iraq or Kasimir.
Originally posted by srsen
How the heck did our original civilisations in Babylon just start out of nowhere if not influenced by existing civilisations? How did they learn language, culture, arts and law? How did they just suddenly know how to do all this?
I mean if there had been NO ruins found and NO anomalous artefacts discovered then I could maybe believe that we are Earth's first civilisation - BUT THAT'S NOT THE CASE!
The Badarian culture provides the earliest direct evidence of agriculture in Upper Egypt. It flourished between 4400 to 4000 BCE, and might have already existed as far back as 5000 BCE. It was first identified in Badari, Asyut.
The tell (mound) of Ubaid (Arabic: عبيد) near Ur in southern Iraq has given its name to the prehistoric Pottery Neolithic to Chalcolithic culture, which represents the earliest settlement on the alluvial plain of southern Mesopotamia. The Ubaid culture had a long duration beginning before 5300 BC and lasting until the beginning of the Uruk period, c. 4100 BC. The invention of the wheel and the beginning of the Chalcolithic period fall into the Ubaid period.
The Norte Chico civilization (also Caral or Caral-Supe civilization[1]) was a complex Pre-Columbian society that included as many as 30 major population centers in what is now the Norte Chico region of north-central coastal Peru. It is the oldest known civilization in the Americas, having flourished between the 30th century BC and the 18th century BC. These dates are contemporaneous with the Valdivia culture in Ecuador. The alternative name, Caral-Supe, is derived from Caral in the Supe Valley, a large and well-studied Norte Chico site.
Originally posted by srsen
Spot on. There is A LOT of suggestive evidence, but you know what, many are happy to accept suggestive evidence in other areas and consider it fact.
My point? What is blasphemous bad science one-day, is revolutionary truth the next.
Sometimes there's a very good reason why a crap idea is laughed at or ignored. Because it's crap.
Originally posted by srsen
VERY quick example of what I mean (I'm actually at work and am amazed I've been to post these replies without getting busted!! :lol
Look at Mohenjo Daro in the Indus Valley. It is approx 5,000 years old right? But what do you guys think about the fact that they have found NINE layers of civilisations buried underneath it?
Originally posted by Nohup
Something being blasphemous bad science is not a good indicator of the quality of an argument. Sometimes there's a very good reason why a crap idea is laughed at or ignored. Because it's crap.